Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion

  • The Rossi believers intrepid leader

    asks A.R. about the tests.



    1. Frank Acland September 18, 2019 at 9:00 AM

      Dear Andrea,

      How is the progress of your testing going these days?

      What do you think will be the end result of all the testing you are doing, and do you expect to demonstrate the E-Cat SK Leonardo in 2019?

      Many thanks,

      Frank Acland

    2. Andrea Rossi September 18, 2019 at 9:23 AM

      Frank Acland:

      We are doing very well, I still am optimist about launching the Ecat SK Leonardo with permanent ssm this year.

      Warm Regards

      A.R.

  • Rossi is a cheater, he never had a working product, he only thought up the reactor and the fuel composition.


    Then came Alexander Parkhomov, and using his fake thought up reactor design and fuel composition showed that it was working.


    ?


    Your statement is quite false.

    For example even when MFMP (and they are not skeptics) tried to verify the Parkhomov’s claim and his “reactor" in Padua (after ICCF-19) it didn't work, none AHE.

    So I can agree just with: "Rossi is a cheater, he never had a working product".

  • Rossi is a cheater, he never had a working product, he only thought up the reactor and the fuel composition.


    Then came Alexander Parkhomov, and using his fake thought up reactor design and fuel composition showed that it was working.


    ?


    I have heard several times that Parkhomov used Rossi's reactor and fuel design and had a successful run. However...

    I have followed the Rossi saga since the beginning. I have NEVER seen Rossi publish enough detailed information to do a replication of any type.

    Can anyone provide the exact composition? Can any one provide the exact power input, voltage, amps, phase, etc.??


    Can anyone tell me exactly what the cat and mouse is? (Not a theory, but actual words from Rossi)


    Can anyone tell me if Parkhomov is using the blue plasma light Rossi is now using? Rossi abandoned the 1MW plant a couple of years ago. He abandoned the high temp cat, the gas cat , the Quark X, So exactly WHAT is Parkhomov replicating or showing it works?


    This is a true problem with this field. People want LENR to work so badly, that when someone states they have a working device, people start imagining relations to previous works to give it more credibility. (Relating to Rossi does the opposite in my opinion! It degrades the credibility)


    So again, how can someone replicate Rossi when Rossi has never, ever provided any reasonable data on what he was doing. He has never, ever shown reliably that his stuff even works. He has shown and been proven, time and time again to lie, deceive and cheat. Which seems most likely? He has a world changing technology or that he simply is a fraud. He has been proven a fraud and has never proven anything works.


    Use a 1 ohm resistor? Sure! How about using various catalysts? Sure.... what are they and what amounts? Radio frequency? Sure. How about AC or DC, phase or single. These have all came under scrutiny, but Rossi never clarifies what is what.


    Parkhomov may have a working reactor.... or he may not. His calorimetry is very questionable it appears. But if he does have a working reactor, his interest may have been started by the Rossi story, but he certainly is NOT doing a replication. Even now, my understanding is that his reactors do not resemble anything Rossi is currently doing with the "dancing ballerinas".


    Truthfully, we could say Parkhomov is replicating Russ George... or Celani... or Piantelli, or Muzino... for that matter! It would be about the same as far as factual data is known!

  • Parkhomov claimed he made Rossi's idea work. He may have "showed" it but there are no credible replications. Nor papers. Adequate evidence is still lacking, IMO.


    I have to agree with your statement.


    Currently the problem is that there are many publications of positive results which are not published or when they are published lack a scientific review.

    The other problem in the LENR field is that there is a lack of independent replications.


    However I am hopefull that given the amount of published positive results that LENR exists.

    It is now up to the scientists, so I hope the new THE NUCLEAR STRUCTURE RESEARCH GROUP will bring a positive effect.


  • If I was twenty years ahead of the competition, I doubt I would want 'replication' either.

    Parkhomov and others are feeding off Rossi's hints and his Spirit of invention.

    Seek and you shall find.

    (I'm in a pro Rossi mood today and quite enjoying it. Blessed be! )

  • Oh God now Rossi is twenty years ahead? Does that mean if I survive 20 more years, all I will see from Mizuno, Mills, Parkhomov etc is new dancing ballerinas and campy songs with puppet shows? Hardly makes life worth living.

    Hehe, now there's a picture. Mizuno and Mills and Parkhomov in puppet shows. It seems that Rossi's songs and puppet shows are unique in the history of 'science', unless I'm missing something. From one perspective, Rossi is so secure in his E-cat results and in himself that he is having fun presenting those results, even knowing that many will mock him for doing so. It's almost of biblical proportions: "Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? ... God was pleased through the foolishness of what was preached to save those who believe."

    Anyway, enough of that. Notice the last lyrics of the "Year of the Cat" song:

    "You know sometime you're bound to leave her
    But for now you're going to stay
    In the year of the cat
    "

    Does Rossi know he is bound to abandon his E-cat? Or is such truly unthinkable to him? Either way, what a story.

  • If I was twenty years ahead of the competition, I doubt I would want 'replication' either.


    To be fair - that would only be the case if you had a clear roadmap to commercialisation - such as IH offered, and Rossi's non-working devices removed.


    Also worth noting: none of the competition shows any sign of competing commercially - so whether 20 years ahead of them or no I'd not feel the need to appear as court fool.

  • To be fair - that would only be the case if you had a clear roadmap to commercialisation - such as IH offered, and Rossi's non-working devices removed.


    Also worth noting: none of the competition shows any sign of competing commercially - so whether 20 years ahead of them or no I'd not feel the need to appear as court fool.


    Seeing the incompetencies of IH through the information from the Doral trial, I'm doubtful they would have offered a clear path to commercial success. I had originally thought IH was the knight in shining armour who came to procure victory, but that didn't last long.


    Rossi has the campy puppet show and song, and narrates his demo with a weakened, compromised voice. It's a mystery of human psychology: Most took him to be foolish, yet a relative few (such as myself) were rather endeared by it. I blame my earlier days as a bible believer for seeing biblical parallels:


    "I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children. Yes, Father, for this is what you were pleased to do."

    "My power is made perfect in weakness"

    etc


    On the flip side maybe Jesus would have taken a whip to Rossi's enterprise for trying to sell snake oil in the temple of science.

    Again, what a story.

  • It really will never end..