Display More
- Lars October 2, 2019 at 6:46 AM
Dear Andrea,
Is it the ssm control,
or the electricity production
that is still to be resolved?
- Andrea Rossi October 2, 2019 at 8:22 AM
Lars:
The two things are just two faces of the same coin. We need the electricity from the plasma to make the plasma production self sustained.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rossi code for: "it does not work"
If it did, with his "measured" output power > 50 X input power, it would be trivial to do this loopback.
Sam, considering the reaction you get here for posting Rossi’s inane prattling, why do you do it? Do you honestly think these things will make a positive impression on anyone with any sense? Do you think it enhances Rossi’s reputation? Your own? Or do you somehow get a thrill making people think you are foolish? Seriously - what is your motivation?
Rossi code for: "it does not work"
If it did, with his "measured" output power > 50 X input power, it would be trivial to do this loopback.
Oh no. Loop back makes the safety certification invalid.... Rossisaid this many times.
Sam, considering the reaction you get here for posting Rossi’s inane prattling, why do you do it? Do you honestly think these things will make a positive impression on anyone with any sense? Do you think it enhances Rossi’s reputation? Your own? Or do you somehow get a thrill making people think you are foolish? Seriously - what is your motivation?
I sure don’t get any motivation reading your comment.
I also think Rossi should be played out to the end.
I think it's fine
For Sam
To post
Rossi's stuff.
It's the subject of this thread after all
But am I the only
One to read Sam's posts
Like one would
Read poetry?
But am I the only
One to read Sam's posts
Like one would
Read poetry?
Blank verse.
I sure don’t get any motivation reading your comment.
I also think Rossi should be played out to the end.
And you are determined to do whatever you can to help him play his scam as long as possible.
I also think Rossi should be played out to the end
It is pretty clear that is what Rossi will do... It is a slightly sad thing, except some here are still so indignant at the brazen lies that they don't have much sympathy for him
QuoteI also think Rossi should be played out to the end.
You're like the little boy inexpertly giving a recital and going on and on and on. The conductor whispered to him, "Isn't it time to end it?" to which the boy replied in a panic, "I'm way past the end!"
You're like the little boy inexpertly giving a recital and going on and on and on. The conductor whispered to him, "Isn't it time to end it?" to which the boy replied in a panic, "I'm way past the end!"
And the Band Played On.
Display MoreGerard asks A.R. about the hours
he works.
- Gerard McEk October 1, 2019 at 5:49 AM
Dear Andrea,
I see you are up extremely early this morning.
I guess you were not kicked out of your bed by your dear lady, so maybe it is an important day today?
Success, kind regards, Gerard
- Andrea Rossi October 2, 2019 at 3:52 AM
Gerard McEk:
In these days we work night and day, without fixed time to sleep and eat. We sleep or eat when we have time. We must get the result at any cost, but we still are not there.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rossi sleeps about 7 hours a night. He has done that for years. That is what he did during the test at Doral too. He slept in the plant from about midnight each night to about 7AM. He tried hard to give the impression that he was working furiously through the night and then going home to attempt to catch a few hours sleep each day but the problem with that scenario is that he was posting on his silly blog site all day and that gave the deception away.
Rossi is posting early in the morning because he is now in Europe ... probably Italy. He has been there for a while. He posts during regular European daytime hours but it appears as early in the morning because the server for his blog keeps US Eastern time.
What's he doing in Italy? He seems to spend 2-4 months there each year. He's an old guy now, and in ill health. I hope he's taking it easy ... far away from his robots and his manufacturing sites and his "team".
Display MoreA prime example of simple BS and yet deemed important enough for a believer to repost!
Sam12,
Can you please explain to me, as I obviously am uninformed, exactly what ""the result" is??????
A "result" that is so important that they for go sleep and eating habits for?
A "result" that must be obtained "at any cost"!
A "result" that you deem important enough to repost Rossi's JONP entry?
Can you not see the absolute ridiculousness of this! Rossi believers cling to whatever Rossi posts and yet they do not even have any idea what is really being talked about! (I.E. nothing!)
So please educate me in exactly what this "result" is that MUST be obtained! Not speculation, but from Rossi's own words exactly what he is talking about!
While we are at it, can you educate me exactly what the SK version had that the "Sigma 5" Quark did not have that demanded it's abandonment?
Can you please explain exactly what the Leonardo version has that demanded the SK abandonment?
That would be most helpful.
Thank you!
It may be difficult, but for the purpose of what is said below, try to suspend disbelief for a moment ; pretend for awhile. If you can't help but chortle or scoff, all is forgiven.
The desired 'result' these days is generating enough electricity directly from the plasma, to feed back into the plasma in order for it to self sustain, without any connection to the grid. The benefits are : 1) it would make for a compelling demonstration and 2) a working device free from the grid is a sought after device.
The plain E-cat SK generates only heat and has not been abandoned. The E-cat SK Leonardo is supposed to create enough electricity directly from the plasma to keep the plasma going without an external power source. It will still be primarily a heating device.
The 'Sigma 5' was an in-house measure of reliability and pertained to a specific laboratory prototype version of the E-cat called the Quark-X. Presumably very much of that reliability (of control box/plasma control?) carried over into the subsequent and much larger SK version. Still, the SK would naturally have potential problems specific to its design that will need to be uncovered and worked out as it runs in its field trials. At the remote premises of certain undisclosed customers.
There, that wasn't so bad.
Display MoreIt may be difficult, but for the purpose of what is said below, try to suspend disbelief for a moment ; pretend for awhile. If you can't help but chortle or scoff, all is forgiven.
The desired 'result' these days is generating enough electricity directly from the plasma, to feed back into the plasma in order for it to self sustain, without any connection to the grid. The benefits are : 1) it would make for a compelling demonstration and 2) a working device free from the grid is a sought after device.
The plain E-cat SK generates only heat and has not been abandoned. The E-cat SK Leonardo is supposed to create enough electricity directly from the plasma to keep the plasma going without an external power source. It will still be primarily a heating device.
The 'Sigma 5' was an in-house measure of reliability and pertained to a specific laboratory prototype version of the E-cat called the Quark-X. Presumably very much of that reliability (of control box/plasma control?) carried over into the subsequent and much larger SK version. Still, the SK would naturally have potential problems specific to its design that will need to be uncovered and worked out as it runs in its field trials. At the remote premises of certain undisclosed customers.
There, that wasn't so bad.
You make a straight forward response....except....
Most of the above is a supportive interpretation and not what Rossi actually said!
He has mentioned self sustain mode, but has in no way described any aspect of it. So the "results" could be this, they could be reliability, they could be contolibilty, they could be safety...... they most likely are simply BS lies and misdirection. He has done this for years! Put out cryptic statements and let his loyal believers fill in the blanks! Just as you did here.
It is incorrect that the SK was heat only. Rossi stated clearly that the predecesor QuarkX had heat, direct electricity AND thrust! Forgetfulness is a requirement to be a Rossi believer!
Rossi made a big deal about the QuarkX certification. He certainly painted a picture that it was certified, not simply tested in house. Again, a supportive construct not from Rossi himself.
Then of course, one must "forget", that every iteration had a customer, robotic factory ready for production in a few months and a projected target date/time frame that is always forgotten.
Note that Rossi NEVER mentions the 1MW plant, the QuarkX or other predecessors as this would bring up unfullfilled statements and contradictions.
No, while your resonse sounds reasonable, it is not actually from Rossi, but a construct that is made up from cryptic posts.
Rossi, being a convicted fraud, absolutely KNOWS maintaining deniability is very important! His defense will always be "I never said that....some forum poster did".
He has done this for a decade.
PS.
I almost forgot....
Having a robotic factory since almost 10 years ago... he holds his "world changing technology" demo in his residential condo!
Not his state of the art robotic factory!
Why do people continue to belive ANYTHING this guy says?
Note that Rossi NEVER mentions the 1MW plant, the QuarkX or other predecessors as this would bring up unfullfilled statements and contradictions.
Funny thing is that Rossi did just recently mention the Plant, and said that it never had ssm...
After listening to the remaining Rossi acolytes, one has to wonder (with great trepidation) what other things these people believe and how they manage to go through life without sending all their money to Nigerian princes and telephone Windows Support scammers.
Funny thing is that Rossi did just recently mention the Plant, and said that it never had ssm...
Blatently contradicting oneself is now quite acceptable in Western political leaders - I can think of two glaring examples - so why not Rossi too?
Funny thing is that Rossi did just recently mention the Plant, and said that it never had ssm...
Another comment on SSM
Karl-Henrik Malmqvist:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Thanks Sam. Someone has to keep up with Rossi, and you save the rest of us from having to keep track.
- Hello Santa,
Is your goal with the SSM project to extract enough electrical energy not only to feed Rudolph's red nose bulb but also to feed the sleigh thrust and some fans/pumps for Helper's billions/year toy factory?
Best Regards,
Karl-Henrik- Santa Claus December 24, 2019 at 11:59 PM
Karl-Henrik Malmqvist:
Yes.
Freezing Regards,
S.C.
Now Santa himself reading Dottore blog. Now I think that ecat is as real as ever.
