Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion

  • Both!


    That is the beautiful thing about Rossi's blog. He gives one bit information (yes = 1, no = 0) and then leaves it up to his disciples to interpret how many questions that one bit answers, while allowing grandiose extrapolation of the information to amazing levels of complexity (business plans, partners, team members capabilities, etc). The man is brilliant! (either that or the disciples are stupid, not sure which).

  • That is the beautiful thing about Rossi's blog. He gives one bit information (yes = 1, no = 0) and then leaves it up to his disciples to interpret how many questions that one bit answers, while allowing grandiose extrapolation of the information to amazing levels of complexity (business plans, partners, team members capabilities, etc). The man is brilliant! (either that or the disciples are stupid, not sure which).


    Next year JONP site will adopt a new coding for Dotore's answers to save even more bandwidth: Q: <any> A: <knock once for YES | twice for NO | 3 times for No Comment>

  • Just did a quick and dirty PTO search, nothing new for Rossi.

    You can automate these searches by using the free of charge service of PAAS (an USPTO service).

    After registration PAAS sends you an update on all your created alerts by e-mail every week.


    Please, mind the privacy terms of PAAS's facilitator.

    As you probably know, nothing is really for free.

    Optionally, using VPN and an e-mail address that does not represent your name and/or company may help keeping your (alert) data anonymous.

  • Hi All,


    To me the below seems like a pretty smart post. You guys are much smarter. What do you think? Happy NY btw.


    Cheers,


    JB




    December 30, 2019 at 4:09 PM

    Mattias Andersson:

    1 Even if I am not currently following this line of research, as you have seen on [1], I consider the pico-metric neutral aggregates described in

    http://www.researchgate.net/pu…nge_particle_interactions

    as the best candidates to support the hypothesis of a transmutation paths of Li and Ni: see equation 49 of

    “Electron Structure, Ultra-Dense Hydrogen and Low Energy Nuclear Reactions” in JCMNS Vol 29

    2 Norman Cook’s lattice nuclear models, based on a pure electromagnetic interpretation of nuclear force, have inspired the hypothesis of a possible balancing of Coulomb repulsion between electrons in dense clusters by a Lorenz force generated by the Zitterbewegung currents

    3 The idea of interactions at picometric scale between electrons and nucleons open the door to an entirely new field of science ( pico-chemistry ) where the possible formation of new nuclear isomeric states cannot be excluded.

    4 Accepting the ZBW model for the elementary particles, the range of the electro-magnetic binding energies is inversely proportional to the size of the ZBW current loops. For this reason, the short range nuclear binding energy should be at least three orders of magnitude stronger than in pico-metric aggregates. The orders of magnitude are:

    1 eV chemistry, 1 keV pico-chemistry, 1 MeV nuclear chemistry

    Warm Regards,

    A.R.

  • JB (WCG), is it not obvious to you Rossi did not write that post, with the possible exception of the "warm regards"? The structure, wording, grammar etc are completely unlike Rossi's typical broken english. The content is considerably more complex than anything Rossi is capable of. The only time he has come close is in "his" paper, which also was written in the same eloquence, until the end sections about the ecat which suddenly degraded in quality to typical Rossi. The same author of the majority of the last paper likely wrote this blog post. Do you really believe Rossi wrote this? Someone should ask him point blank who writes this stuff, but of coarse he will delete the "troll" post.

  • Hi PhysicsForDummies ,


    That is not the point, now is it?


    The point is that either Rossi “steals” smart words from somebody to keep his “fraud” going (not very plausible) or he has found somebody capable of using smart words that is willing to join his team (much more plausible).


    If the latter is true, this again adds weight to the statements of Rossi and makes it more likely the Italian Jesus is in fact...the Italian Jesus.


    Maybe you should check this article and see if Il Dottore copied his shizzle from there;


    https://www.researchgate.net/p…origin=publication_detail


    Cheers,


    JB

  • So you are saying Rossi using other people's words and claiming them as his own, fraudulently and without attribution, gives him more credibility? Interesting. I wonder who wrote his philosophy degree thesis. I wish you were my college professor, plagiarism be damned. (And Vanilla Ice gained so much respect from me for "Ice Ice Baby").

  • No need to wish you a happy new year, w_c_g. It must be a good feeling to know that no matter what Rossi does (or more likely, doesn’t do), you will be delighted by it and find cause for celebration.

    Hi interested observer ,


    You old lemon. Your sourness will only get worse while you age. I hope your neighbours do not live to close. All the best, buddy..2020 will be a tough year.


    Cheers,


    JB

  • PhysicsForDummies


    Look here:- https://www.researchgate.net/p…itterbewegung-LENR-theory.


    You will see that Georgio Vassallo supports Vessela Nikolova's blog. Vessela is Rossi's hagiographer. Rossi has friends and helpers. QED.

    Using "friends and helpers" words as your own without citation or attribution is fraud. Are you guys saying it would be acceptable to have a friend write your PhD thesis? This whole pico-chemistry buzzword is old and never caught on. But your choice of the word hagiographer is spot on, if wcg's Italian Jesus holds true ;)

  • So is Pico-Chemistry the same as Mills Hydrino? From can 's reference, this is how Dufour describes it:


    "in a pico-nickel hydride, a (shrunken) hydrogen atom would be inside the electronic cortege of the Nickel and bound to the nickel at close proximity of its nucleus."

  • I would say "pico-chemistry" reactions of various elements, annihilation of the same pico-chemical and/or UDH aggregates is what is going on. Actually it's not the same thing probably pico-chemistry (Dufour) and the dense hydrogen structures as Holmid defines are more realistic and experimentally verified though only slightly different than hydrinos stuff! I posit that's partially what the Suncells/SAFIRE run on too if they work. THIS FALLS WITHIN THE STANDARD MODEL.