Alan,
Does Frank receive profitable revenue from advertisers?
If so, just like Rossi, maybe “salvation” isn’t his only motive?
Alan,
Does Frank receive profitable revenue from advertisers?
If so, just like Rossi, maybe “salvation” isn’t his only motive?
If so, it's really hard he's going to meet your last deadline of April 1st ... Are you going to extend it any further?
At the end of March if Rossi says testing is going well and soon completed.Yes
If he says testing not going well
and more work to be done.No
You MUST be joking?
Sam is Frank Akland’s alias here.
Frank could not duplicate my poor
English even if he tried.
If Rossi worked hard he might be
able to replicate it since English is
his second language.
Alan,
Does Frank receive profitable revenue from advertisers?
If so, just like Rossi, maybe “salvation” isn’t his only motive?
If he does make money he deserves
it for the headache of running his
Blog.
Does Frank receive profitable revenue from advertisers?
I have no idea - I don't see any adverts on there, or on here- in fact until very recently I had no idea that anybody saw ads on here. I use good adblockers so it never even crosses my mind. But if he does make money, it's a very modest amount I'm sure.
It is wise to avoid people with strong believes whether it is a believe in Dottore or something traditional like Santa etc.
Andrea Rossi October 8, 2015 at 7:32 AM
At the end of March if Rossi says testing is going well and soon completed.Yes
If he says testing not going well
and more work to be done.No
Rossi will say both...
Testing is going well and will soon be completed but there is more work to be done.
Sometimes I think Rossi blog is taken over by a researcher in human behaviour. He posts nonsense and then tracks popularity and sentiment to see where the limit is to which some humans can be manipulated.
At the end of March if Rossi says ...
I lost you after that. Whatever Rossi says should be believed at all? Has Rossi ever said things aren't going well? Why has nobody else on his team, customers, etc said anything at all?
I have known Frank for over a decade, he is a very serious-minded individual. I can guarantee he has never put money into the Ecat, but has a sincere hope and belief that someone (like Rossi) will be able to save our hide., and the planetary ecosystem. He has zero financial motive, he started ECW to - as he sees it- help bring salvation to the world
You know him ?
Then, please tell me, WHAT makes him apply the same "censorship" on his page, as Rossi does ?
Follow Sarah Waldhof on his blog, he is kicking the shit out of this stupid, contradictory, ba.....rd.
Sarah for president.
Then, please tell me, WHAT makes him apply the same "censorship" on his page, as Rossi does ?
It's his blog, he runs it how he likes. not my business.
It's his blog, he runs it how he likes. not my business.
More or less it could be the same case of Passerini's 22passi blog. He strongly supported the Dotore for almost 10 years and recently gave up stating that hes a puppet manipulated by Bigs to discredit LENR field. The main difference from ECW is that 22p is a wide range topics blog (love, poetry, green energy, economy, technology, human rights, etc... ) so removing the dedicated section didn't mean to shut down the whole blog. ECW instead, as single topic blog, is at risk if definitively proven that the miracle isn't real. The same is happening with the hundreds of internet domains/sites/blogs/forums created right after the Energy Catalyzer Gold Rush times. Most of them are now abandoned or showing very outdated products or infos.
I have no idea - I don't see any adverts on there, or on here- in fact until very recently I had no idea that anybody saw ads on here. I use good adblockers so it never even crosses my mind. But if he does make money, it's a very modest amount I'm sure.
Sometimes I think Rossi blog is taken over by a researcher in human behaviour.
Just like most of his last magificent paper and a few techical blog posts were taken over by someone with a knowledge of physics and proper English grammar.
Just like most of his last magificent paper and a few techical blog posts were taken over by someone with a knowledge of physics and proper English grammar.
... I told You all, this is nothing but an experiment with human behaviour. Which purpose it ever might have...
... I told You all, this is nothing but an experiment with human behaviour. Which purpose it ever might have...
Thing is even if he doesn't have something the real physics quoted in the paper could develop into an actual product if handled by the right team.
I didn't notice any 'real physics' in his paper.
With so much if if if i have one which should go up to half meter probably..
Thing is even if he doesn't have something the real physics quoted in the paper could develop into an actual product if handled by the right team.
.