Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion

The Heisenberg Uncertainty principle is under attack experimentally.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/r…/2012/09/120907125154.htm

https://www.sciencedaily.com/r…/2017/11/171113104709.htm

What happens if experiment doesn't support the theory?

Quote from zorud

I do see adverts on ECW, like this one...

It is quite difficult to call that page an "ad". A teenager student with basic programming skills would be able to put together a much nicer one.

I can't really imagine who could be the target of a such unprofessional site, if not a brand new suckercustomer/partner.

For sure one of Frank Aclands ways of making business to run his ECW website (aka "sponsored by Leonardo...)

Quote from Navid

The Heisenberg Uncertainty principle is under attack experimentally.

In fact it has been refuted in the general form. Thanks to spooky actions at a distance (something Mills does not understand...). Indeed classically a particle has two states (forms to store energy) - spin and momentum. The coupling of these two quantities is extremely weak. Thus you can measure spin and energy at the same time what is needed for quantum computers.

Quote from Wyttenbach

In fact it has been refuted in the general form. Thanks to spooky actions at a distance (something Mills does not understand...). Indeed classically a particle has two states (forms to store energy) - spin and momentum. The coupling of these two quantities is extremely weak. Thus you can measure spin and energy at the same time what is needed for quantum computers.

Whether it is understood is less of a concern than if the experiments work in the parameters given. Especially performed by those with no stake in the outcome. Of course besides the fact we would all benifit from positive results of a new denser energy source, regardless of which theory describes it more accurately.

SKL soon to be tested.

1. Frank Acland February 29, 2020 at 9:31 PM

   Dear Andrea,

   Are you at a point where the E-Cat SKL can be submitted to third party testers, or are there still problems to resolve?

   Best wishes,

   Frank Acland

2. Translate Andrea Rossi March 1, 2020 at 4:57 AM

   Frank Acland:

   We are close to be ready.

   Warm Regards,

   A.R.

Frank asked Rossi if the SKL is ready for third party testing.

I wish it was close to the SKL

presentation.

Quote from Max Nozin

I want Rossi to sue third party tester for stealing his IP. Will be lots of fun.

He will sue them for stealing his plasma optimized stethoscope

Quote from Cydonia

With so much if if if i have one which should go up to half meter probably..

Quote from Dr Richard

I didn't notice any 'real physics' in his paper.

The paper itself is inconclusive, but a couple of the referenced works state interesting pathways, nothing that is impossible. A couple, not all of them to be clear. We can laugh at anyone who shows different approaches or we can test it mathematically and experimentally. Only one of those options will actually prove it right or wrong.

Sorry LeBob it was just an epidermal reaction because so much stupid things are said here around Rossi by 99% of notorious incompetents.

Of course, their quasi-religious verse remains only to oppose believers and unbelievers to hide few they learned at school as little soldiers, discovered by others greats.

Yet I have never seen a deep analysis here for all these years to correlate the petrochemical field which remain Rossi's main and first expertise both with LENR technical level from Piantelli / Focardi time.

Quote from Cydonia

Sorry LeBob it was just an epidermal reaction because so much stupid things are said here around Rossi by 99% of notorious incompetents.

Of course, their quasi-religious verse remains only to oppose believers and unbelievers to hide few they learned at school as little soldiers, discovered by others greats.

Yet I have never seen a deep analysis here for all these years to correlate the petrochemical field which remain Rossi's main and first expertise both with LENR technical level from Piantelli / Focardi time.

I'd agree that Rossi's earlier disastrous attempt to sell technological innovation was petrochemical, but not that he has true expertise in that area.

My understanding: Rossi is clever, and has enough general science to sound good to non-specialists, is good at wide-ranging scientific and philosophical conversations (of the sort that the cleverest teenage Cambidge undergraduates used to have and think themselves oh so clever). Such broad grasp of ideas, and articulacy, is fun, and can seem very convincing.

Alas it is not the same as the detailed expertise needed to make things work for real.

i would not mind, except Rossi adds to this quite usual bullshitting style of behaviour a whole load of lies. That is not so easily forgiven.

If Rossi does have genuine petrochemical scientific expertise I'd like some independent evidence of this?

I was just thinking of an awesome new version of the e-cat, which would be worth suspending the industrialization of the current versions. The new incarnation could be the e-cat BTC. By incorporating a mining rig, fed free electricity to mine bitcoins or other cyber currencies, all the while generatig heat for the off the grid server farm, what more could you ask? This bitcoin strategy worked for Steorn's Orbo president McCarthy as he became the leading bitcoin trader in Ireland after the Orbo's mysterious failure to pass Frank Acklands stringent test on ECW

Quote from Cydonia

Sorry LeBob it was just an epidermal reaction because so much stupid things are said here around Rossi by 99% of notorious incompetents.

Of course, their quasi-religious verse remains only to oppose believers and unbelievers to hide few they learned at school as little soldiers, discovered by others greats.

Yet I have never seen a deep analysis here for all these years to correlate the petrochemical field which remain Rossi's main and first expertise both with LENR technical level from Piantelli / Focardi time.

First of all my surety that what we call LENR is predominantly nuclear is weak. All evidence points to allowing picoscale interactions, electro-magneto-chemical phenomina.

Quote from Siccario

That was the only good thing, Ackland ever did. And reliable.

It was only good because it comfortably fitted into preconceived ideas of what is possible? Sometimes our minds limit the laws of physics more than these laws limit reality. Though I commend Akland for a thorough debunking of that.