Good news is SKL tests are finally
going to start this month.
-
-
sam12 - it is interesting that Rossi doesn't seem to face any problems at all in these terrible days, and is able to travel around in Europe and stay in close contact to other 3rd parties and his testing agency. In Italy and many more other EU countries (Sweden to come soon) many companies are grounded and almost all public business and travel is locked down.
The only thing which i still working is blogging and answering silly questions from any place in the world on a computer or Laptop - you just need to be wired and on air. As we know this is no problem for Rossi and Leonardo since they have sold and running Heat-as-service at secrect customer, controlled over the internet. Maybe you can ask Rossi how this is in these Coronavirus times...?
-
-
Confusing?
-
Good news is SKL tests are finally
going to start this month.
......Well nothing like a bit of light entertainment to distract us from these coronavirus times!
-
Good news is SKL tests are finally
going to start this month.
Whatever happens I'll be here observing keenly!
-
Confusing?
Seems as a series of somewhat "encrypted", "confused" messages, some are Rossi-related.
-
Perhaps Rossi should switch his unused "robotised production line" to making medical ventilators
-
it is interesting that Rossi doesn't seem to face any problems at all in these terrible days, and is able to travel around in Europe and stay in close contact to other 3rd parties
Rossi does not need to respect international laws, just like he does not need to respect the laws of physics.
-
Rossi does not need to respect international laws, just like he does not need to respect the laws of physics.
Hypothetically what laws of physics are being broken in a device with stats like his claim?
-
Hypothetically what laws of physics are being broken in a device with stats like his claim?
Wien’s Law and Planck’s Law, for starters.
Although not exactly a law of physics, Kirchhoff circuit laws are also highly assaulted. -
Idk the exact example you are refering too?
Wien’s Law and Planck’s Law, for starters.
Although not exactly a law of physics, Kirchhoff circuit laws are also highly assaulted.There is a difference in describing the frequency emission of a reaction and the actual visible heat exchanger's frequency or temperature. The reaction materials would be mixed with catalysts and what have you, idk, have down conversion and such. There is also people expecting nuclear energy spectra and not seeing it because the phenomina is different. Surface area?
-
Idk the exact example you are refering too?
There is a difference in describing the frequency emission of a reaction and the actual visible heat exchanger's frequency or temperature. The reaction materials would be mixed with catalysts and what have you, idk, have down conversion and such. There is also people expecting nuclear energy spectra and not seeing it because the phenomina is different. Surface area?
Now I have no idea what you are talking about.
I refer to most of what Rossi considers adequate physical proof of his claims. -
Now I have no idea what you are talking about.
I refer to most of what Rossi considers adequate physical proof of his claims.I was referencing Wein's law and Planck's law. Something about blackbody radiation, frequency and temperature.
-
I was referencing Wein's law and Planck's law. Something about blackbody radiation, frequency and temperature.
All of Rossi’s plasma devices rely on the misuse of Wien’s Law, abuse of Planck’s Law, and finally complete refusal of Kirchhoff’s circuit laws in order to function as Rossi claims.
-
Specifics would be good, but I see were your reasoning springs from.
-
Specifics would be good, but I see were your reasoning springs from.
The specifics are spread around this thread, but if you have questions I can attempt to answer as best I can if there is something in particular that you are unclear on.
-
Declaring things impossible when multiple means of attaining the specs have been proposed seems premature. Just saying, it may not be him, but saying a portable device with more energy density than standard chemical sources, outputting electricity and heat, is impossible is closed minded. This is irrigardless of if anyone has it or not.
-
Declaring things impossible when multiple means of attaining the specs have been proposed seems premature. Just saying, it may not be him, but saying a portable device with more energy density than standard chemical sources, outputting electricity and heat, is impossible is closed minded. This is irrigardless of if anyone has it or not.
No, nothing at all like that.
It is impossible for Wien’s Law to be used without a blackbody or greybody. It simply does not work with a few scattered spectral peaks. That’s just a fact. It does not matter what the source of light is.
Then pretending that the few spectral peaks can be treated as a blackbody or greybody is also wrong. Whether the spectra comes from a star, a hair drier, or an axilon enforcer makes no difference.
Etcetera for the Kirchhoff circuit laws. One cannot calculate the correct total circuit power only from measuring a sense resistor. I made a handy circuit on Circuit Simulator to demonstrate this quite clearly.Combine these ingredients badly, and a COP (Rossi Style) of 22000 is easy, even if one is ‘conservative’ and rounds a few things here and there.
-
Display More
No, nothing at all like that.
It is impossible for Wien’s Law to be used without a blackbody or greybody. It simply does not work with a few scattered spectral peaks. That’s just a fact. It does not matter what the source of light is.
Then pretending that the few spectral peaks can be treated as a blackbody or greybody is also wrong. Whether the spectra comes from a star, a hair drier, or an axilon enforcer makes no difference.
Etcetera for the Kirchhoff circuit laws. One cannot calculate the correct total circuit power only from measuring a sense resistor. I made a handy circuit on Circuit Simulator to demonstrate this quite clearly.Combine these ingredients badly, and a COP (Rossi Style) of 22000 is easy, even if one is ‘conservative’ and rounds a few things here and there.
Thanks! So even with shoddy measurements it's still possible to have a more reasonable COP of 14 or 200 plugging along even if the optimistic false calculations said 2200. Reminds me of Mills who got extremely high COPs in explosive, short runs or runs with certain components. When he changed components/elements/designs to make the reactor more stable or longer running, according to his theory, the COP dropped to around 5 over long runs. The phenomina isn't fake due to early optimistic and hasty measurements not adding up. Theory determines how most approach realty, but the engineer is more concerned about making it work in desired parameters whether it breaks a schema or not.
