I have been saving Heinz Sause for the frozen crow Axil said we would be eating a few months ago. The crow is looking freezer burned. Hey Axil, can you come claim your crow now? I realize Covid is a valid excuse for you and Rossi, but let's not waste food.
-
-
QuoteDisplay More
Svein H. Vormedal
May 27, 2020 at 2:35 PMDear Andrea.
Sweden has, the last two weeks, the world’s highest covid-19 mortality in relation to the countrys population.
Planning a presentation, in another country, may now be simpler, safer and give a faster result?
Regards: Svein H. Vormedal
Andrea Rossi
May 28, 2020 at 6:22 AMSvein H. Vormedal:
Sweden is a great Country and I am sure also Sweden will go through the damn Covid 19 tunnel.
About the mortality percentage: Sweden is also the Country that made the higher percentage of tampoons.
The presentation will be made in Sweden, obviously when the situation will be normalized. I think that the Countries of Europe will exit the emergency together.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Completely false like the man that wrote it.
Sweden has a population of about 10 millions of persons, up to today Sweden made only 23659 tests per million of population that means 2.36% of population and Sweden is 56th in the world. About the absolute number of tests made by Sweden, currently the total number is 238800 and Sweden is 53th in the world.
data source: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
-
Well I'm glad someone seems to know what Rossi intended when he said that Sweden made the higher percentage of 'tampoons'. I sure don't!
But I'll take a wild guess anyway. Perhaps the gist of what he said is that, no matter what statistics in Sweden show - about anything - the show (demo) will still go on (in Sweden).
Rossi keeps me guessing and full of wonderment. What a guy! He turns 70 next week.
-
Well I'm glad someone seems to know what Rossi intended when he said that Sweden made the higher percentage of 'tampoons'. I sure don't!
But I'll take a wild guess anyway. Perhaps the gist of what he said is that, no matter what statistics in Sweden show - about anything - the show (demo) will still go on (in Sweden).
Rossi keeps me guessing and full of wonderment. What a guy! He turns 70 next week.
Personally, Rossi fascinates me like a slow train crash during which train staff continue to sell tickets for the afternoon in-seat film.
-
Frank and ECat World is going to be
involved with SKL Presentation.
Frank
Have you thought of a follow
up to this reply?
Frank Acland
May 27, 2020 at 12:04 PM
Dear Andrea,
Have you started making plans yet for the public presentation?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Andrea Rossi
May 27, 2020 at 1:12 PM
Frank Acland:
Yes.
E-Catworld will be involved.
Warm Regards,
Yes, I am going to try and find out what we can do.
-
looking forward to his puppet show, good old Rossi
-
higher percentage of 'tampoons'.
"Tampoons" are the secret "charge" of the SKL.
Perhaps Rossi is battling e-cat toxic shock syndrome, hence the engineering delays.
Edit by Shane; Rossi brought it up, but remember we have ladies in the room.
-
E-cats and mice whatever next
-
E-cats and mice whatever next
Snoop-doggs an Deadmau5s
-
THH, this is the Rossi thread. Please don't hijack this thread about Rossi heroically saving the world, with unimportant things like Covid-19 or Stalinesque government behaviour.
-
I hope Frank Acland will use at least Full HD video equipment this time, and not his VHS camcoder.
Nowadays each $40 USB webcam has better video quality than this crap of the last demo...but maybe it is intentional, so you can't identify the scam...oh I mean the "secret sauce".
-
Rossi ready for third party testing.
- Frank Acland
May 31, 2020 at 10:52 AM
Dear Andrea,
Is the E-Cat SKL developed to a point where you would be happy to have a third party test it hands-on, when circumstances permit. Or does it need further development before reaching that moment?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
- Andrea Rossi
May 31, 2020 at 11:08 AM
Frank Acland:
We are ready for that, provided a due agreement is done.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
- Frank Acland
May 31, 2020 at 10:52 AM
-
We are ready for that, provided a due agreement is done.
It has always been the case, folks. Reputable third parties have had trouble with Rossi's idea of due agreement:
NASA
Hydrofusion (not very reputable, but they pulled out)
IH
IH is a stunning case where in a surfeit of optimism they actually agreed to pay Rossi $10M up front with another $90M soon if his stuff could be made to work when tested independently, and with no financial incentive for a continuing relationship. From papers released they would have given Rossi the money anyway had his stuff just worked for them. At all. This is Rossi's idea of a due agreement.
Rossi then faked "tested independently" into "tested by Rossi pretending to be a reputable third party", provided spurious results, and then sued for the $90M.
Wow!
Bet they regret it now...
-
Display More
It has always been the case, folks. Reputable third parties have had trouble with Rossi's idea of due agreement:
NASA
Hydrofusion (not very reputable, but they pulled out)
IH
IH is a stunning case where in a surfeit of optimism they actually agreed to pay Rossi $10M up front with another $90M soon if his stuff could be made to work when tested independently, and with no financial incentive for a continuing relationship. From papers released they would have given Rossi the money anyway had his stuff just worked for them. At all. This is Rossi's idea of a due agreement.
Rossi then faked "tested independently" into "tested by Rossi pretending to be a reputable third party", provided spurious results, and then sued for the $90M.
Wow!
Bet they regret it now...
It always amazed me that such seemingly intelligent businessmen could be so easily manipulated by a conman.
I thought, “Are these people truly this gullible or greedy, or do they just want so badly to believe it is true, that they ignore all the obvious telltale signs of a con”.
Oh well, A Fool and his money were parted
-
“Are these people truly this gullible or greedy, or do they just want so badly to believe it is true, that they ignore all the obvious telltale signs of a con”.
One or all of the above, no doubt.
-
Oh well, A Fool and his money were parted
Woodford Patient Capital Trust in this case.
-
Display More
What I can't really understand is WHY F.A,, thats runs ECW and clearly is a commercial partner/promoter of Dotore's business, (see pic below) needs to communicate with him by one of the countless and ridiculous posts on JONP.
Can't he just pick up the phone and ask directly Dotore? Just don't let fans fall asleep?
Sam, do you happen to ask this yourself, other than cherry picking/pasting the most promising
jokesposts from jonp reader?Franks posts on Rossi Blog keep
him and everyone updated on how
A.R. Is progressing.
My guess is Frank did communicate
directly when he seen A.R. offered
him the chance to be involved
in the SKL presentation.
Fat chance that he is a commercial
partner.He does indirectly promote
Rossi but only because he still
believes that Rossi will still end
up with a commercial product.
-
Fat chance that he is a commercial
partner.He does indirectly promote
Rossi but only because he still
believes that Rossi will still end
up with a commercial product.
That's pretty much my opinion.
-
It always amazed me that such seemingly intelligent businessmen could be so easily manipulated by a conman.
Why did such seemingly intelligent businessmen when confronted with a court case against him not show in court that the Lugano test was flawed ?
As Para stated, with the Optris ravi files it would take about 10 minutes to do so.
And that would have been very strong evidence against Rossi.
Maybe it is telling that IH did not take that route ?
-
Why did such seemingly intelligent businessmen when confronted with a court case against him not show in court that the Lugano test was flawed ?
As Para stated, with the Optris ravi files it would take about 10 minutes to do so.
And that would have been very strong evidence against Rossi.
Maybe it is telling that IH did not take that route ?
Because the Court Case had nothing to do with whether the Lugano test was flawed.
If it were relevant, it would have the difficulty that it is very technical. So it would be one expert against another. You can find scientists (e.g. Levi in this case) who will hold almost any position. Although you'd have better scientists showing it was flawed, the jury would get bored with the technical details and the end result would be somewhat random.
Court trials with Juries about science are not the same as scientific debates, with an accurate science conclusion. they are more like PR shows where the expert who sounds better wins.
