Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion

  • The has been more than 100 fusion reactors built since the 1950s.
    China. European Union. India. Japan. South Korea. Russia. United States all have tried and all have failed.


    That's 60 years of trying and failing. At least Rossi has demoed over unity, that's more that the rest of the world can do. You better hope that Rossi can do the job or your world will be climate changed into a burnt out cinder. Get use to smoke of a burning world.

  • I mean - other than "Rossisays!" You probably can provide any other source than ECW or JONP, can't you? :-)


    Even worse! In the past triumphs at least we had anticipations with pictures, video, people speaking out in public, enthusiast professors from balooney university and Uppsala, plumbers and electricians at work ...

    This time other than months of "yes, yes, no, yes" strings from Jonp, just the plain void. (ECW doesn't count since its source is Jonp)

  • After Rossi's upcoming ultimate triumph, a new thread shall be commissioned :


    Rossi's Ultimate Triumph.

    Welcome back Axil. There are not enough Rossi folks left anymore so it is good to have more people to chat with.


    I remember last time I saw you posting here, about 7 months ago or so, you said we would be eating crow very shortly. Has the crow spoiled, or did you put it in the freezer? Isn't there an expiration date for Rossi to deliver in your mind?


    You say Rossi demonstrated COP > 1. I must have missed that. Has the Nobel Prize committee been notified?


    And I wanted to ask you about this new physics you mentioned on ECW that I never learned about studying electrodynamics in college.

    Your quote: "Dynamic magnetic fields... fields produced by an electric current... is not effective in the production of the LENR effect. Only a static magnetic field applies.

    The LENR reaction is caused by ultra strong static magnetic fields"


    I was under the impression that the magnetic fields produced by magnets and by electromagnets were pretty much the same. Can you point me to textbooks or scholarly articles describing the field equations you are using? I don't think Mawell's Equations support this line of reasoning.

  • Static and dynamic magnetic fields are different in that varying magnetic fields induce currents, but static ones does not. I've been involved in magnetic field devices for steel industry and a steady magnetic field is some kind of brake and a dynamic one is stirring the mold. So there is certainly a difference in applications of it. But yes as a phenomena they are the same, the same equations apply for both of them.



  • The Dirac equation

  • The Dirac equation

    The dirac equation with EM does just connect the em fields to QM it does not distinguish between static or dynamic magnetic fields however this representations assumes the EM field foollows the Maxwells equation and there there is some variations in equations depending on if the magnetic field varies or not as a constant field means time derivatives becomes zero of the magnetic part. But there is not different equations for stationary or dynamic directly in Quantum Electrodynamics

  • Yes my point is that there is no difference in the field that would cause moving the magnets to break LENR.

    And magnetism produced by current loops are not by definition "dynamic", if the current is constant.

    not sure if I'm pedantic now, but the time derivative of magnetic fields induces current so if you have a steady current induced by a magnetic field , the magnetic field has to be dynamic.

  • The dirac equation with EM does just connect the em fields to QM it does not distinguish between static or dynamic magnetic fields however this representations assumes the EM field foollows the Maxwells equation and there there is some variations in equations depending on if the magnetic field varies or not as a constant field means time derivatives becomes zero of the magnetic part. But there is not different equations for stationary or dynamic directly in Quantum Electrodynamics


    To background this issue, some old posts connecting static magnetism to LENR:


    [Vo]:RE: An experiment you never heard of


    Russ George Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:31 PM


    Reply-To: [email protected]

    To: [email protected]


    I had the privilege of standing in the parking lot of the hotel where Chukanov had his demo running for several hours in the company of Martin Fleischmann fusing some of our little grey cells over that device. Chukanov answered or at least responded to every single question we posed to him and we sent many his way. It was a fascinating and captivating demo. Martin was the kind of man who had insatiable curiosity and not a mean molecule in his body and showed it in his sincere interest and professorial manner. Chukanov sent us both away with several large chunks of his metal.


    Meanwhile the hundreds of ICCF conference attendees almost entirely shunned the ‘parking lot demo’ and Chukanov, especially the self-appointed high priest insiders of cold fusion. There was little but derision and snide attacks behind Chukanov’s back at the meeting.


    After a couple hours in hot afternoon sun with Chukanov and his machine Martin and I adjorned to the beach and floated for a long time like basking whales chatting about this and that.


    Somewhere in my collection of ‘cold fusion’ holy treasures I have some of Chukanov’s SmCo5 metal. I think I will dig it out and see if some of the recent ‘activation’ ideas make it work even better!


    ==============================================


    Most of what the anonymously posted notions of 'Axil' are indeed not new. Martin Fleischmann, Kiril Chukanov, and I had a spirited conversation about very similar ideas more than 20 years ago while examining Kiril's working device as it was making prodigious 'anomalous heat.' There was no denying the heat or the measurement of it at hand. SmCo5 loads hydrogen at a ratio of 5:1 by the way, far above Pd's 1:1. If you want nano-fractures in metals I defy anyone to make more such nano-features than what occur in SmCo5 that is hydrogen loaded and deloaded repeatedly. The 5x hydrogen loading shatters the lattices causing hydrogen embrittlement to such a degree that after many such cycles one can crush the metal to nano-dust with your fingertips! What Kiril, myself, Martin and others were missing at the time was the very high intentional temperature zone that Rossi's work has engendered! Not to say that we were not familiar with dramatic effects at such high temperatures as Fleischmann's Singularity and my cavitation sono-fusion metal volcanoes clearly proved. http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/


    =================================================


    Aha – so that’s where Dennis Cravens probably got the idea to use SmCo in his famous NI Week Demo. Notably, samarium has a high percentage of radioactive isotopes which could be activate by fractional hydrogen.



    From: Russ George


    What about the demo of Chukanov at the ICCF meeting in Hawaii many years ago. In large cylinders crushed and powdered SmCo5, magnetic metal, was cycled with hydrogen loading and deloading and produced kilowatts of apparent excess heat!



    From: Jones Beene


    … but wait, there’s more… (best Billy Mays’ tin cup plea)


    In another experiment you may not have heard of - from Bockris and Sundaresan in 1994 - it was shown that magnetic stimulation boosted excess heat substantially in a Pd-D electrolysis cell. This line of work leads up to the Letts-Cravens effect – wrt understanding the influence of a magnetic field on LENR.


    “After the cathode had been charged with deuterium for 48 hours at a current of 80 mA, the cell was placed in the field of a permanent magnet of 200 Gauss strength. The cell electrolyte temperature rose to 5°C above ambient after 230 seconds. After 576 seconds, the magnet was replaced by two Neodymium magnets with a 800 Gauss field. The temperature immediately started increasing and reached 13.5 °C above ambient in about 15 minutes and remained constant. The temperature returned when the magnet was removed… [end of Bockris quote]


    The $64 question - why isn’t a magnetic field fully employed in the glow-stick experiments? By “fully employed” it is meant that: yes, the heater wire does provide a minimal field but increasing the field strength by an order of magnitude could be beneficial.


    … relevant comment: those who do not remember the past cannot benefit from its insight- paraphrase of famous Santayana quote, which is the logic behind the LENR-CANR library.

  • Axil static magnetic field does not radiate. That's why longer lasting effects probably must be static. That has nothing to do that there is a difference in nature between dynamic and static fields, the y are the same in all known equations for them.

  • The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) is the soliton that produces the static chiral magnetic electroweak field that generates the LENR reaction.


    I judge that enough theory has been accumulated to layout the process that explains the steps involved in the creation of the EVO by an electric arc or explosion and the EVOs subsequent maturation process, and lifetime maintenance


    The first step that the electric explosion must achieve is the production of an ultra dense form of matter that seeds the EVO soliton. This compression of matter is most likely accomplished through the generation of a shock wave initiated by the explosion.


    The types of materials that can form this seed is wide ranging and includes both elements and chemical compounds. Carbon, copper, lithium, hydrogen, noble gases, and water are among the materials that support the formation of this ultra dense material seed.


    This ultra dense material forms a nanoparticle that is comprised of a positively charged core that in tern is comprised of a lattice of proton cooper pairs surrounded by a core of very low lying electrons that form a non orbiting stationary spin wave. The electron spin wave is kept in place by a balance between spin attraction and the magnetic repulsion of the Meissner effect.


    In the next step, the light produce by the electric explosion is captured within the spin wave layer for a period of time that is long enough for the electrons that have been captured in the spin layer to disassociate into Dirac spinors through the entanglement of light and matter.


    How about the photons produced by the explosion themselves? Can anything slow a photon down so that these photons can interact with the electrons? It turns out that a BEC can. In fact, it can even stop a photon (in effect) for a few seconds, then reconstitute it (with all the quantum information it contains still intact) and allow it to resume its course. This behavior of the photon nearing the BEC allows the photons and the electrons to become entangled with high efficiency.


    The Dirac spinors have now been purged of the quantum charge property of the electron.


    Consistent with the hole theory of superconductivity, to balance the charge of the positive proton core, more free electrons are attracted to the positively charged nanoparticle. These electrons are now converted to more Dirac spinors in a chain reaction that continues only constrained by the availability of free electrons without limits until an electroweak singularity is eventually reached.


    Since the nanoparticle is a superconductor and also a superfluid, no energy is lost by the EVO through dispersion. As the EVO accumulates more spin, a supersolid lattice of Dirac spinors form. When the amount of available free electrons is large, this spin accretion process continues until a tipping point is reached where the EVO explodes in a Bosenova. Bosenova explosion has also been seen and verified in experiment.


    Experiments has shown through the examination of their tracks and marks created in solids that the EVO can become macroscopically large before Bosenova explosion occurs. This explosion of Dirac spinors is the mechanism whereby the energy stored in the EVO is released to the environment in the non nuclear form of excited electron energy transfer.


    It has also been shown that cavitation can produce a form of ultra dense water that behaves is a similar way to the nanoparticles produced by electric explosion in solid matter.


    What is that nature of the energy that is derived from the Bosenova quantum mechanical explosion? Where does the energy that the Bosenova releases come from? In the earliest days of the formation of the universe, this energy release mechanism occurred when the Higgs field came into existence and when the weak force separated from the EMF, and when electrons acquired mass.


    The EVO replicates in reverse the processes that occurred in the formation of the universe when the combined forces of nature separated. The Bosenova replicates the release of energy when the forces separated.


    Implosion and explosion of a Bose-Einstein condensate "Bosenova"

    https://www.nist.gov/news-e...


    Quote

    The condensate first shrinks as expected, but rather than gradually clumping together in a mass, there is instead a sudden explosion of atoms outward. This "explosion," which actually corresponds to a tiny amount of energy by normal standards, continues for a few thousandths of a second. Left behind is a small cold remnant condensate surrounded by the expanding gas of the explosion. About half the original atoms in the condensate seem to have vanished in that they are not seen in either the remnant or the expanding gas cloud.


    Since the phenomenon looks very much like a tiny supernova, or exploding star, the JILA team dubbed it a "Bosenova." The most surprising thing about the Bosenova is that the fundamental physical process behind the explosion is still a mystery.

  • Holmlid has been claiming for years that ultra dense hydrogen can produce decay in the proton. The connection between proton decay and electroweak unification is well established in grand unification theory. When a laser pulse irradiates Holmlid's ultra dense hydrogen, a EMF singularity forms as described above and proton decay is the result.


    https://inspirehep.net/literature/155747


    Quote

    Abstract: (Elsevier)
    Grand unified theories, in which the strong and electroweak interactions are embedded into an underlying theory with a single gauge coupling constant, are reviewed. A detailed description is given of many of the necessary background topics, including gauge theories, spontaneous symmetry breaking, the standard SU 2 x U 1 electroweak model and its modifications and extensions, Majorana and Dirac neutrino masses, the induced cosmological term, CP violation, quantum chromodynamics and its symmetries, and dynamical symmetry breaking. The Georgi-Glashow SU 5 model is examined in detail. Models based on unitary, orthogonal, exceptional, and semi-simple groups and general constraints on model building are surveyed. Phenomenological aspects of grand unified theories are described, including the determination of the unification mass, the prediction of sin 2 θw in various models, existing and planned nucleon decay experiments, the predictions for the proton lifetime and branching ratios, general baryon number violating interactions, and the possible explanation of the matter-antimatter asymmetry of the universe. Other aspects of grand unified theories are discussed, including horizontal symmetries, neutrino and fermion masses, topless models, asymptotic freedom, implications for the neutral current, CP violation, superheavy magnetic monopoles, dynamical symmetry breaking, and the hierarchy problem.

  • The Scalar Wave is central to tesla theory. The Scalar Wave connect to static fields and this theory is not covered by maxwell's equations.


    This article explain how to add via math scalar waves to the maxwell equations and how scalar waves are connected to LENR.


    https://www.researchgate.net/p…on/327447483_Scalar_Waves


    Quote

    There is wide confusion about what “scalar waves” are both in serious and less serious literature on electrical engineering. This chapter explains that this type of wave is a longitudinal wave of potentials. It has been shown that a longitudinal wave is a combination of a vector potential with a scalar potential. There is a full analogue to acoustic waves. Transmitters and receivers for longitudinal electromagnetic waves are discussed. Scalar waves were found and used at first by Nikola Tesla in his wireless energy transmission experiments. The SW is the extension of the Maxwell’s equation part that we call the More Complete Electromagnetic equation, as described herein.


  • See. If one corrects simple errors in any single sentence, then you get inundated with a barrage of word salad intermingling every possible fringe theory all rolled up into an unarguable mess. Then one gives up. It is impossible to argue a million things at once. Here is just one tidbit that caught my eye.

    The connection between proton decay and electroweak unification is well established in grand unification theory.

    Grand unification theory is not well established. Hence how can aspects be well established? Which unvarified GUT are you using?

  • See. If one corrects simple errors in any single sentence, then you get inundated with a barrage of word salad intermingling every possible fringe theory all rolled up into an unarguable mess. Then one gives up. It is impossible to argue a million things at once. Here is just one tidbit that caught my eye.

    Grand unification theory is not well established. Hence how can aspects be well established? Which unvarified GUT are you using?

    Just about all of them.


    See



    Grand Unification Dream Kept at Bay


    https://www.quantamagazine.org…ation-must-wait-20161215/


    Quote

    Glashow, for one, largely lost interest in the whole affair when SU(5) was ruled out. “Proton decay has been a failure,” he said. “So many great ideas have died.”


    Grand unification hasn’t died, exactly. The circumstantial evidence is as compelling as ever. But the idea could remain in perpetual limbo, rather like the proton.



    The LENR reaction is a gateway to a new paradigm in failing science.

  • “The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) is the soliton that produces the static chiral magnetic electroweak field that generates the LENR reaction“


    BINGO!!

    I didn't see this in Rossi's paper that completely explains the ecat. Rossi says it's all about SLuRPIes from 7/11. Axal, why not help Rossi, Mizuno, Russ George, Mills, everyone else out since you have all the physics completely worked out. Did you offer help to them before? I actually got emails from both Rossi and Mills. Rossi when I corrected his Celsius to Kelvin conversion error, and Mills when I asked him about how hydrino materials can be magnetic. They can be reached. A paper explaining your physics in Research Gate would get more views than even Rossi. You would have to hire someone to put equations in it though, not just lots of unusual words.

  • I didn't see this in Rossi's paper that completely explains the ecat. Rossi says it's all about SLuRPIes from 7/11. Axal, why not help Rossi, Mizuno, Russ George, Mills, everyone else out since you have all the physics completely worked out. Did you offer help to them before? I actually got emails from both Rossi and Mills. Rossi when I corrected his Celsius to Kelvin conversion error, and Mills when I asked him about how hydrino materials can be magnetic. They can be reached. A paper explaining your physics in Research Gate would get more views than even Rossi. You would have to hire someone to put equations in it though, not just lots of unusual words.


    I do have a posit about how Russ George produces the LENR effect.


    Alan Smith put together a cavitation based unit to mix Russ's fuel



    This unit generates ultra dense water or compresses some other material that comprise Russ's fuel. This ultra dense material is what produces the LENR activity that Russ is seeing. If Russ stops using the cavitator, his reaction will go away.


    I will get into a peer review of Rossi's theory paper later if that is alright with you.

  • The has been more than 100 fusion reactors built since the 1950s.
    China. European Union. India. Japan. South Korea. Russia. United States all have tried and all have failed.


    That's 60 years of trying and failing. At least Rossi has demoed over unity, that's more that the rest of the world can do. You better hope that Rossi can do the job or your world will be climate changed into a burnt out cinder. Get use to smoke of a burning world.

    Looking very much forward to the day Andrea Rossi saves the world, mercy.


    People like this can vote & reproduce,

    they can legally buy guns, dope, booze, meds, they can teach, preach & publish.


    Planet earth is indeed in a world of hurt.