Can you cite these results, or can't they be disproved just because they are secret?
No, based on the available published data. You can read my posts here, on vortex and see my reports on lenr.qumbu.com (which is way out of date).
Can you cite these results, or can't they be disproved just because they are secret?
No, based on the available published data. You can read my posts here, on vortex and see my reports on lenr.qumbu.com (which is way out of date).
No, based on the available published data. You can read my posts here, on vortex and see my reports on lenr.qumbu.com (which is way out of date).
Too much stuff. In this case, everything is like nothing.
Here (1) you find the list of the Ecat tests carried out in 2011. Can you please specify which tests can't be disproved?
For what I saw, all of them can be easily disproved, and after realizing which artifacts were used in the 2011 tests, the shows held in subsequent years are not even worth the time it takes to read their results.
I'm not revisiting the whole history, but Rossi has some results that I can't disprove.
Try to be more optimistic. I would bet you sure could disprove the Rossi "results" if you just set your mind to it.
But I like scientific things to be proven or at least provable, rather than saying it can't be disproven as a bogus indicator of "evidence".
That's why I dislike string theory so much, for example.
Try to be more optimistic. I would bet you sure could disprove the Rossi "results" if you just set your mind to it.
But I like scientific things to be proven or at least provable, rather than saying it can't be disproven as a bogus indicator of "evidence".
That's why I dislike string theory so much, for example.
An awful lot of people seem to think that if you can't prove that something is wrong, then it must be right. Totally bogus reasoning. I say there are purple sasquatches living in Connecticut. Go ahead. Prove me wrong.
I once opened the playground because of serious problems, strangely enough the playground is now more informative than this thread.
Too much stuff. In this case, everything is like nothing.
As I said earlier ... I don't have time to go through all that now.
But don't confuse 'not proven' with 'dis-proven'.
My 2x2 matrix should really be 3x3
[always truthful,sometimes truthful/sometimes lies,always lies]
x
[has something, maybe has something, has nothing]
For that I'd put Rossi in the middle square.
And meanwhile, I'll wait to see what he comes up with next.
Display MoreAs I said earlier ... I don't have time to go through all that now.
But don't confuse 'not proven' with 'dis-proven'.
My 2x2 matrix should really be 3x3
[always truthful,sometimes truthful/sometimes lies,always lies]
x
[has something, maybe has something, has nothing]
For that I'd put Rossi in the middle square.
And meanwhile, I'll wait to see what he comes up with next.
I don't believe this is how you solve probabilities, with matrices like this. I will have to pull out my text books. For example what vector do you multiply this matrix, and what is the solution? Or is it just a bad analogy?
The absolute and undisputed king of weasel words, adds a new crowning achievement! God Willing!
Dr Rossi,
Have you the strength to write here: “I am sure that the Ecat SKL will be presented within the year 2021” ?
Thank you if you can,
Norma
Norma:
I, Andrea Rossi, am sure that the presentation of the Ecat SKL will be made within the year 2021 ( God willing ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Inshallah
Try teflon for lining your reactors! It works very well on spacecraft and non-stick pans! Alternatively line it with KEVLAR!h
Display MoreThe absolute and undisputed king of weasel words, adds a new crowning achievement! God Willing!
- Norma December 14, 2020 at 7:12 AM
Dr Rossi,
Have you the strength to write here: “I am sure that the Ecat SKL will be presented within the year 2021” ?
Thank you if you can,
Norma
- Andrea Rossi December 14, 2020 at 10:17 AM
Norma:
I, Andrea Rossi, am sure that the presentation of the Ecat SKL will be made within the year 2021 ( God willing ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Again... along ten years already seen a lot of presentations of Rossi’s stuff as part of the farce. After that again all will be forgotten and he will switch to another “improved masterpiece”. Which kind of puppets and dummies will he show this time in order to drive this new presentation?
Try teflon for lining your reactors! It works very well on spacecraft and non-stick pans! Alternatively line it with KEVLAR!h
Very good for non-stick bullet-proof calorimetry of course.
”. Which kind of puppets and dummies will he show this time in order to drive this new presentation?
Interesting story of a puppet master.
Interesting story of a puppet master.
Nah, the video told the story of a serious and professional puppeteer, not chatterboxes moved by the illusionist like the puppet "Physicist" of jonp.
But don't confuse 'not proven' with 'dis-proven'.
I didn't.
All these tests can be dis-proven:
The other tests, IMO, can be ignored.
I didn't.
All these tests can be dis-proven:
The other tests, IMO, can be ignored.
I think the external modules showed up a bit later than October 28, 2011, but before May 2012.
They were present at the Validation, eventually becoming “Tigers”, then “Big Frankies” ca. 2013-2014 after being fitted inside the new longer red Plant container.
I think the external modules showed up a bit later than October 28, 2011, but before May 2012.
They were present at the Validation, eventually becoming “Tigers”, then “Big Frankies” ca. 2013-2014 after being fitted inside the new longer red Plant container.
Please, watch the video and look on the roof of the container.
Please, watch the video and look on the roof of the container.
The video wasn’t working, but I found a photo of Stirling next to the container on the 28th, that has the boxes on top, foil covered. So the extra reactors have been there for a long time,
Thanks.
Where were the pumps for the roof reactors before the 2012 Pop Sci article? They didn’t appear on the ‘steam’ outlet end until Ferrara it seems.
Where were the pumps for the roof reactors before the 2012 Pop Sci article? They didn’t appear on the ‘steam’ outlet end until Ferrara it seems.
You can see my interpretation of the layout of the 1 MW plant in the jpeg (1) I posted on EnergeticAmbiente (2) a few days after the October 28 test.
(1) https://i.imgur.com/B51xW5x.jpg
(2) https://www.energeticambiente.…265944.html#post119265944
Italian/English:
Pompa EP (Esterni Posteriori) = (External Rear modules) Pump
Pompa EA (Esterni Anteriori) = (External Front modules) Pump
S (Sinistra) = Left
D (Destra) = Right
Passacavi = Cable sleeve
Contatore = Water meter
Vasca = Tank
Display MoreYou can see my interpretation of the layout of the 1 MW plant in the jpeg (1) I posted on EnergeticAmbiente (2) a few days after the October 28 test.
(1) https://i.imgur.com/B51xW5x.jpg
(2) https://www.energeticambiente.…265944.html#post119265944
Italian/English:
Pompa EP (Esterni Posteriori) = (External Rear modules) Pump
Pompa EA (Esterni Anteriori) = (External Front modules) Pump
S (Sinistra) = Left
D (Destra) = Right
Passacavi = Cable sleeve
Contatore = Water meter
Vasca = Tank
The 2012 Popular Science article shows a photo of many of those metering pumps bolted to the ‘steam’ outlet end of the blue container Plant, which are probably the ones that ended up in an array at the double door end of the Doral red container Plant.