Display MoreOMG, I have been spending my Christmas trying to make sense of Rossi mishmash of other peoples work. What a depressing life.
I have a lapsed undergraduate physics background. The people who should really comment are the peer reviewers.
Can you find any peer reviewer here?
Also the people he borrowed the math from should really be heard from.
What does Hanno Essen have to say about it? Is Essen working with Rossi?
The whole Darwin Lagrangian part was lifted from his Essens paper. (see attachment(
Some first quick thoughts (since nobody seems to have commented on the actual content of the "paper" yet).
All this about the SK. What happened to the SKL mostly electricity version?
If the SKL works as good as he said in his results section with a COP of 54, why the He double hockey sticks does he need the SKL?
The SK will win multiple Nobel Prizes if any of this is correct.
Quote from the very beginning:
"The E-Cat technology poses a serious and interesting challenge to the conceptual foundations
of modern physics".
My comment, how can something that has not been shown to work, or even really exist, challenge modern physics?
Section from the end rehashes all the test results are lifted from the bogus Stockholm "Industrialization".
If Rossi is not lying about customers having it, has someone else duplicated his spectral analysis results and energy generation/COPlenr-forum.com/attachment/15464/?
Has this device been given to anyone to replicate his experiment?
I am still going through the doc. Same thing is with the last version. It does not indicate any source of energy, and how this energy could be calculated.
This section hints at it but has a major issue:
"2.5 Entropy of the coherent clusters
Although the formation of charge cluster coherent states is compatible with the condition
of stationary Action 22 , its probability is heavily hindered by the extremely low entropy of
such states. The order of magnitude of the entropy ratio between non-coherent and coherent
congurations is approximately equal to the number N of interacting particles, considering
that the coherent state can be described by a single wave-function, as in BEC condensate.
The Darwin Lagrangian may be used for non coherent states of N interacting electrons
observed at time scales larger than the Zitterbewegung period (tz ' 8:1 1021s). In this case
the average value of the component of the vector potential orthogonal to electron velocity
vanishes and does not play a role in magnetic interactions, but his hidden in the kinetic
energy term, being the value of its module multiplied for the elementary charge equal to the
electron rest mass in natural units."
OK, paragraph 1 makes sense in that such coherent states should be low entry.
But paragraph 2, WTF? How does this explain that such clusters should form with lower entropy? It doesn't. It is total BS.
Like everything else in this paper, no real explanation of how energy is released "from the vacuum'".
Sam, can you explain paragraph 2 and how that somehow implies these low entropy clusters?
That is my quick take. I'll continue reading.Essen Darwin Lagrangian.PDF
I would like to hope he's talking about higher entropy, cause that's where you get energy from, a local increase in entropy.