Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion

  • 2021-07-01 18:09 Iggy Dalrymple 

    Dear Dr Rossi,

    A number of SKLed lamps mounted on a helicopter (for crime scene investigations or for military reconnaissance) would make a dramatic presentation. Always good to tweak the interest of government.

    Best Regards,

    Iggy


    2021-07-02 12:20 Andrea Rossi 

    Iggy Dalrymple:

    I think that your idea is very good,

    Best,

    Norma


    2021-06-17 14:22 Norma 

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,

    I too hope you will present also the Ecat SKL together with the SKLed.

    All the best,

    Norma


    2021-06-17 15:10 Andrea Rossi 

    Norma:

    So do I,

    Warm Regards,

    A.R.


    2021-06-09 09:02 Norma 

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,

    I think that your paper

    http://www.researchgate.net/pu…nge_particle_interactions

    has in the references one of its most interesting parts. The references are a gold mine of information about the zero point energy. I noticed that it is not a casual collection of papers someway related to your matter, but they are punctual and straight to the point referred to.

    I think this is one of the reasons why it is the most read physics paper on Researchgate.

    Cheers

    Norma


    2021-06-09 13:09 Andrea Rossi 

    Norma:

    Thank you for your attention to the paper,

    Warm regards,

    A.R.


    2021-05-06 00:23 Norma 

    Dear Dr Rossi,

    1- do you confirm that the presentation of the Ecat SKLed will be made on November 25th 2021 ?

    2- Do you confirm that the Ecat SKL will be presented in 2022 ?

    3- Congratulations for your paper

    http://www.researchgate.net/pu…nge_particle_interactions

    It is the most read paper of the world during the last two years: do you know in which geographic area your paper got more readings ?

    Cheers

    Norma


    2021-05-06 03:37 Andrea Rossi 

    Norma:

    1- yes

    2- yes

    3- USA and Europe, but the diffusion of the readers in all the Countries of the world has really surprised me.

    Warm Regards,

    A.R.


    2021-04-20 08:45 Norma 

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,

    I watched the Ecat SKLed on http://www.ecat.com: what a beauty !

    I proudly made my order with some emotion…after years of waiting.

    Ad majora,

    Norma


    2021-04-20 09:10 Andrea Rossi 

    Norma:

    Thank you for your kind support,

    Warm Regards,

    A.R.


    2021-04-15 06:52 Norma 

    Is the spectrum of the Ecat SKLED equal to the normal Maxwellian of the visible light ?

    Thanks

    Norma


    2021-04-15 06:56 Andrea Rossi 

    Norma:

    No, it is different.

    Warm Regards,

    A.R.


    2021-04-13 08:55 Norma 

    @Jorge:

    The Navy did not just replicate the Rossi effect, as you correctly write: they are trying to plagiarize it with their patent application. The usual story of David versus Goliath

    Norma


    2021-03-10 11:00 Norma 

    Dr Rossi:

    If, as you said, the Ecat SKL will have a superior value in Lumens by orders of magnitude with a consume of Watthours lower by an order of magnitude respect the best existing leds, you will be marketing the most convenient lamps of the world by orders of magnitude, which means a reduction in the order of the 20% of the consume of fossil fuels.


    2021-03-10 11:12 Andrea Rossi 

    Norma:

    Possibly.

    Warm Regards,

    A.R.

  • Mats was, is and will continue to be “All In”

    with Rossi. He is so far down the Ecat road now he cannot admit to himself or anyone else, that he, like many others, was duped by a conman.

    Huh? You speak as if Mats writes about the Ecat without reservation. Whether the Ecat pans out or not, it's a story that deserves to be told and I'm glad Mats had the balls to pursue it.

  • I noticed the issue of E-CAT by reading their paper. Their understanding on the mechanism of cold fusion is totally incorrect, but it is not easy for everyone to understand Rossi mistakes.

    According to Rossi it's not cold fusion or LENR, it's energy from the vacuum. As I understand Rossi, when an electron gets very close, it gives up energy to the proximate nucleus and the vacuum reimburses it with energy.

  • Huh? You speak as if Mats writes about the Ecat without reservation. Whether the Ecat pans out or not, it's a story that deserves to be told and I'm glad Mats had the balls to pursue it.

    He does write about the Ecat without reservation Mark.

    Mats has never once opined about any of the failures, fakes, sleight of hand, dubious tests, certifications or sock puppet comments that riddle ECW and the interwebs.

    BUT, he always finds a way to justify the steady stream of flat out BS that comes streaming out of ECW and the “Rossiworld” faithful.


    Mats is either on Rossi’s payroll, or so gullible that he is incapable of seeing what is obvious to anyone using common sense, logic and reason.

    Rossi does not have a product or process that produces Energy Out > Energy In and never has, he is either delusional or a conman, what is so difficult about this to understand?

  • According to Rossi it's not cold fusion or LENR, it's energy from the vacuum. As I understand Rossi, when an electron gets very close, it gives up energy to the proximate nucleus and the vacuum reimburses it with energy.

    According to Rossi, his latest device isn’t what the last ones were, (obsolete), and don’t work the way the previous ones did (LENR, ZPE, Neutron juggling/sharing, anomalous electron states, hydrogen pretending to be a muon, etc.). Each new one works with a newer, more complicated, and increasing inscrutable theory until it comes to production of a useful device, at which point it joins the last ones and the new shiny object is presented to the eager and gullible magpies.

  • According to Rossi it's not cold fusion or LENR, it's energy from the vacuum. As I understand Rossi, when an electron gets very close, it gives up energy to the proximate nucleus and the vacuum reimburses it with energy.

    At this point the only energy that the magician is capable of drawing is that from the vacuum of believer minds.

  • External Content youtu.be
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

  • I don't know what you mean by 'self certification'. The 2012 and 2013 certifications by SGS and Bureau Veritas on the Ecat plant and Ecat HT were safety certifications. These types of agencies have many rules on what you do with their certifications in terms of disclosing how they were done, or how their name is used. You appear to be saying those certifications were bogus, without evidence, to promote the idea that the certification Rossi is waiting on for the SKLed is also bogus. I don't believe your viewpoint, but we'll see what happens in November.

    The certifications were not bogus. Rossi's factory (one of them) was i'm sure safe. Rossi's use of the certifications in a context that made it seem like they implied a working device, or (getting them) excused delay in selling it, were bogus.

  • The certifications were not bogus. Rossi's factory (one of them) was i'm sure safe. Rossi's use of the certifications in a context that made it seem like they implied a working device, or (getting them) excused delay in selling it, were bogus.

    It is quite of amazing how old stuff resurfaces anew...!

    The certifications where absolutely "bogus" the way Rossi portrayed them. I should have been more clear i guess. Yes, SGS issued a "certiffication". I published the actual one here a long time ago.


    However, it was "bogus" in that Rossi was stating he had a safety certificate for his eCat. At the time, he was reporting it as an LENR device, a Low Energy Nuclear Reaction device. Not only is the NO standard for certifying and LENR device, the "Certifications" Rossi had was not even for public display, much less claiming public safety. They were indeed bogus for what Rossi was portraying them to be. Anyone is free to look up the SGS cert in the past posts.... I am not looking them up again as this case was closed long, long ago!


    As for the mythical Veritas certification, I am still waiting to see a copy of it from anyone! I personally do not believe it exists.... but I can be proven wrong.


    Mark's excuse that agencies have "rules" and that certifications are not to be published is a bit ironic. The ONLY reason a certification is granted, is to tell others that the device meets a standard.... They are not trade secrets of any kind and agencies will not say they must be kept private. HOWEVER, as in Rossi's exact case, an agency may say a certification is not to be used for any sales, advertising or promotion because the certification was a "self certification", one that a person conducts before sending units to be truly certified.

    The one Rossi had was for some elementary electric switch controls and electrical box enclosures. It had ZERO to do with any NUCLEAR standards.


    Please.... look it up if you do not believe me! :thumbup:

  • You can be sure that the certification on the SKLed will have nothing to do with nuclear energy or supposed vacuum energy. So of course I agree, certification of a Rossi device will have nothing to do with whether it is an energy producer or not.

  • You can be sure that the certification on the SKLed will have nothing to do with nuclear energy or supposed vacuum energy. So of course I agree, certification of a Rossi device will have nothing to do with whether it is an energy producer or not.

    Mark,

    You miss my point. You cannot have a "safety certificate" for a nuclear powered device! There are no standards to certify too! Rossi was saying that the had a safety certificate for his LENR device... as putting this out as some "proof" that he had a device at all!


    He certainly did NOT have a safety certificate for ANY device. It was a self certification check list for some electrical enclosures and switches. It had NOTHING to do with ANY DEVICE that produce HEAT, or ELECTRICITY or LIGHT. It was a total sham. So much that SGS sent a cease and desist order on him.


    Again, "certificates" (plural) have been mentioned. I have never been able to find one from Veritas. Can you provide a copy? I doubt it.


    The whole point is that Rossi lies, he lies constantly, he lies about everything.... fake invoices, fake customers, fake factories and fake certificates. Can you not see this?


    Show me where any point of the above is not absolutely true....... I can show you the solid evidence that that above IS TRUE. It is just that it was all done in the past and I am not going to take the time to dig it all back up again. Not that it matters with you it seems.... you will believe whatever Rossi spews.... I do not understand why..... you have never provided any credible information on why you believe him. :/


  • The whole point is that Rossi lies, he lies constantly, he lies about everything.... fake invoices, fake customers, fake factories and fake certificates. Can you not see this?

    Yes, some things are probably fake. But it doesn't follow that therefore it is all fake.

    I can't help but think there is more to the story than we know and that Rossi is driven by real, incremental progress in furthering an impossible invention. It ain't over till the Ecat lady sings. Surely the closing act is fast approaching. You may be right. I may be right. We'll see.