Just coincidences indeed. What else?
-
-
Quote
- Andrea Rossi
August 15, 2021 at 11:10 AM
Michael:
I am strongly indebted with the USA. Without the US branch of my Team I’d never achieve the results of today. I am working well also with Chinese, as well as with Europeans, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I'm just curious to see what Chinese will cook to the magician soon as they discovered the farce. If true now he's joking with fire and his end approaching.
- Andrea Rossi
August 15, 2021 at 11:10 AM
-
Sounds Familiar.
USA Brains Make Rossi Technology.
Chinese Make Money off
Rossi Technology.
-
Rossi represents USA Brains
It sounds familiar the Rossi Fakenology.
-
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.External Content twitter.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
-
Is the next demo (Nov 25) DPS3?
-
Does Robert E. Godes say when?
My guess is no and certainly not in my my lifetime.
-
SKL a go for Nov 25/21 and
Running in SSM.
Dear Andrea,
It is good to hear that the SKL is still working well.
Some questions to keep us informed, if I may:
1. Is the SKL continuously operating in SSM, so not connected to any external power source?
2. What is the longest duration that it is in SSM until now?
3. You have said that even while it is vacation time, you continue working on the SKL. Can you give us an impression what is still needed to do before the presentation on 11/25?
I wish you great progress and success in the preparation.
Kind regards, Gerard
Gerard McEk:
1- yes
2- 24 hours
3- many things, long and confidential list
Thank you for your sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
November 25th is close: you still sure the Ecat SKL will be introduced by then ?
Yuri:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
-
Display More
Dr Rossi,
November 25th is close: you still sure the Ecat SKL will be introduced by then ?
Yuri:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sam, can you ask if this SKL presentation is just an mere "introduction", or is it an "industrialization" as was the SK launch?
Remember Rossi said that the SK was far past a demo stage, that it was industrialized at that point.
So an introduction seems like negative progress from the previous. massive industrial launch.
Edit: also can you ask if there will be jingles and puppet shows? I am thinking about inviting the neighborhood kids.
-
-
As relevant today as it was nearly 10 years ago.
From New Energy Times:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/n…to-Energy-Catalyzer.shtml
European Financial Editor Says No to Energy CatalyzerMarch 28, 2012
Back to Andrea Rossi Energy Catalyzer Investigation Indexx Dear Editor,
I run Macrotrends, a financial newsletter that's doing quite well here in Belgium and the Netherlands, and I am always curious about the next big thing.
I discovered the story about Andrea Rossi's Energy Catalzyer about a year ago, and I thought this might just be the thing for the energy sector. I wrote a small article about it in August 2011, and I promised to give an update after the E-Cat tests that were to be announced in late October 2011. The tests weren't convincing so I waited, all the while following the information published on ecatnews.com and some other sources.
Then, finally, last month I decided to do a follow-up because there seemed to have been some important developments: claims of the involvement of NASA, SIEMENS, National Instruments, production of the units, the Defkalion story, etc. It all made me very excited about the E-Cat.
After making preparations for an article about Rossi's apparatus for a day and a half, I decided to look for some skeptical voices to try and cross-check my story and make it more balanced. That is how I found the New Energy Times Web site. Your writing style struck me as very reasonable yet critical, and the thoroughness of your arguments and the level of documentation entirely swayed my position.
It hurt, because I had to let go of a dream I'd fallen in love with. I had to admit that I had not found the extraordinary evidence that is required to back up the extraordinary claims put forward by Rossi and his team. Quite the contrary: There are many things I’ve discovered that seem to suggest the E-Cat is, in reality, a fraudulent scheme.
Here are the things that convinced me personally that the E-Cat is a dud:
1. The unsatisfying and suspicious tests of the apparatus:
- During the test performed in your presence, the amount of steam generated seems to be very weak, entirely not in line with the 5,000 Watts claimed by Rossi.
- Rossi's refusal to do non-boiling tests, which can be measured more accurately.
- The fact that, during one of the tests, the observers were allowed to see the machine working for only minutes at a time.
- During the April 28, 2011, demonstration for journalist Mats Lewan, Rossi seems to be fiddling with the power input controls, as seen when Lewan comes back from checking the steam output.
2. The non-existent E-Cat factory.
3. The fact that Rossi, through middlemen, is asking for substantial amounts of money.
4. The large number of obviously shallow Web sites to promote the E-Cat. What genuine inventor would need to do this if it were a real technology? These Web sites are populated by many anonymous commenters, who, in my experience, occupy themselves with baselessly slandering any critical voice.
5. Rossi's reaction to all published critique, his efforts to rebut and deny unfavorable facts right away, instead of letting the tests speak for themselves. Rossi's very aggressive reaction to the $1 million challenge. Rossi’s calling you “the snake” and using ad hominems. In my experience, the honest person welcomes challenges and tests, whereas the crook exposes himself when he becomes angry if confronted with questions that potentially reveal his scam. Rossi is possibly doing the latter.
6. The outrageously low prices for the machine and the fact that Rossi wants to produce them immediately in the millions for worldwide delivery seem void of business reality.
8. All the mystery involved: mystery clients, mystery witnesses, etc.
After discovering all this, I am still open for proof to the contrary but have become highly skeptical about Rossi’s E-Cat project and will no longer put any research effort into it until I read credible reviews of satisfied customers who have bought a working E-Cat.
I’d like to thank you for your hard work on the topic, as it prevented me and my subscribers from possibly investing in a scam, money that is now safe for future investment in a real technology that can help create new energy solutions. Despite the probable scam that is now going on with the E-Cat, I still think low-energy nuclear reactions are an important and promising field of research, and I will remain most interested in the innovations it has to offer.
Tuur Demeester (Personal Web site)
Note : The original intent of this letter was a private thank you note for Mr. Krivit’s work on the topic, but he convinced me that its publication could help prevent investors from losing a lot of money - hence my approval for publication.
-
It's scary how little the scam has changed.
Just a couple of his points that are uncannily familiar:
"6. The outrageously low prices for the machine and the fact that Rossi wants to produce them immediately in the millions for worldwide delivery seem void of business reality."
The $29 LED lamp that includes a "SLRPI" reactor, million unit minimum.
"8. All the mystery involved: mystery clients, mystery witnesses, etc."
And they still talk about these customers and clients (and employees) as real on e-cat world?
-
Display More
As relevant today as it was nearly 10 years ago.
From New Energy Times:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/n…to-Energy-Catalyzer.shtml
European Financial Editor Says No to Energy CatalyzerMarch 28, 2012
Back to Andrea Rossi Energy Catalyzer Investigation Indexx Dear Editor,
I run Macrotrends, a financial newsletter that's doing quite well here in Belgium and the Netherlands, and I am always curious about the next big thing.
I discovered the story about Andrea Rossi's Energy Catalzyer about a year ago, and I thought this might just be the thing for the energy sector. I wrote a small article about it in August 2011, and I promised to give an update after the E-Cat tests that were to be announced in late October 2011. The tests weren't convincing so I waited, all the while following the information published on ecatnews.com and some other sources.
Then, finally, last month I decided to do a follow-up because there seemed to have been some important developments: claims of the involvement of NASA, SIEMENS, National Instruments, production of the units, the Defkalion story, etc. It all made me very excited about the E-Cat.
After making preparations for an article about Rossi's apparatus for a day and a half, I decided to look for some skeptical voices to try and cross-check my story and make it more balanced. That is how I found the New Energy Times Web site. Your writing style struck me as very reasonable yet critical, and the thoroughness of your arguments and the level of documentation entirely swayed my position.
It hurt, because I had to let go of a dream I'd fallen in love with. I had to admit that I had not found the extraordinary evidence that is required to back up the extraordinary claims put forward by Rossi and his team. Quite the contrary: There are many things I’ve discovered that seem to suggest the E-Cat is, in reality, a fraudulent scheme.
Here are the things that convinced me personally that the E-Cat is a dud:
1. The unsatisfying and suspicious tests of the apparatus:
- During the test performed in your presence, the amount of steam generated seems to be very weak, entirely not in line with the 5,000 Watts claimed by Rossi.
- Rossi's refusal to do non-boiling tests, which can be measured more accurately.
- The fact that, during one of the tests, the observers were allowed to see the machine working for only minutes at a time.
- During the April 28, 2011, demonstration for journalist Mats Lewan, Rossi seems to be fiddling with the power input controls, as seen when Lewan comes back from checking the steam output.
2. The non-existent E-Cat factory.
3. The fact that Rossi, through middlemen, is asking for substantial amounts of money.
4. The large number of obviously shallow Web sites to promote the E-Cat. What genuine inventor would need to do this if it were a real technology? These Web sites are populated by many anonymous commenters, who, in my experience, occupy themselves with baselessly slandering any critical voice.
5. Rossi's reaction to all published critique, his efforts to rebut and deny unfavorable facts right away, instead of letting the tests speak for themselves. Rossi's very aggressive reaction to the $1 million challenge. Rossi’s calling you “the snake” and using ad hominems. In my experience, the honest person welcomes challenges and tests, whereas the crook exposes himself when he becomes angry if confronted with questions that potentially reveal his scam. Rossi is possibly doing the latter.
6. The outrageously low prices for the machine and the fact that Rossi wants to produce them immediately in the millions for worldwide delivery seem void of business reality.
8. All the mystery involved: mystery clients, mystery witnesses, etc.
After discovering all this, I am still open for proof to the contrary but have become highly skeptical about Rossi’s E-Cat project and will no longer put any research effort into it until I read credible reviews of satisfied customers who have bought a working E-Cat.
I’d like to thank you for your hard work on the topic, as it prevented me and my subscribers from possibly investing in a scam, money that is now safe for future investment in a real technology that can help create new energy solutions. Despite the probable scam that is now going on with the E-Cat, I still think low-energy nuclear reactions are an important and promising field of research, and I will remain most interested in the innovations it has to offer.
Tuur Demeester (Personal Web site)
Note : The original intent of this letter was a private thank you note for Mr. Krivit’s work on the topic, but he convinced me that its publication could help prevent investors from losing a lot of money - hence my approval for publication.
That reminds me of the Oct 2011 "Military Acceptance Test". It was so obviously a scam, it was laughable. What chutzpah! Especially so when the sold unit -supposedly shipped overseas as reported by Rossi, was seen *still* sitting in his garage months later. Only thing that saved him after that was IH coming along and lending him 5 more years credibility.
Oh well..he gave me some hope for a little while.
-
Look to the Future Nov 25/21
Rossi Promises E-Cat SKL Presentation in 2021 | E-Cat World
The Future is Better than the Past - Asia TrendMost people love a trip down memory lane. They yearn for the past with a tinge of pleasure, because they believe the past is better than the present. However,…asiatrend.org -
At least Rossi's work is good fun. Leornardo da Vinci discovered LENR too before the invention of the wooden helicopter! SPLAT!
-
Some Good News.
10 girls on Afghanistan's robotics team rescued"Ultimately the girls 'rescued' themselves."www.today.com -
Perhaps are they the fantastic Team that composes the core of the famous magician's robotized factory?
-
Sometime in the future they might
be just that in some factory or
high tech project.
Hats off to the young Women and
the Woman from Oklahoma that
put the effort into getting them out
of Afghanistan.
-
In future in a real factory, this excludes the magician stuff.
-
It would be interesting if the white light reached back to the source if it was configured like a Tesla coil missing the wires using only the open cavity. At or past the speed of light on exiting the coil it may get to the source faster then the interning voltage to sustain itself.as lightning.
Interesting times.
