Holmlid is completely open and will demonstrate his methods and results to all who are interested.
Now I'm not interested to contact Holmlid. Maybe after the test.
Sorry again, I asked to you because you wrote here the claim. Can you make available a device that produces XH or not ?
Now I'm not interested to contact Holmlid. Maybe after the test.
Sorry again, I asked to you because you wrote here the claim. Can you make available a device that produces XH or not ?
Holmlid gets a COP of 2.
Holmlid gets a COP of 2.
Following your theory about LENR (exposed here) have you (not Holmlid) built a device that produces an energy COP >1 ?
QuoteAlso, MFMP sent an email to Rossi 4 days ago offering to sent an oberver and/or help with a black box setup, no response yet
ROTFWL! Like Rossi will allow anyone who knows how to do it to perform a black box or any other definitive test!
Quote
No, because to get that result I had to live 352 days inside it 16 hours per day, from 6 P.M. to 10 A.M of the following day, and two other persons, one engineer and one electrician, had to cover from 10 A.M. to 6 P.M., not to mention when I had to stay for 20 hours and the others of the Team had to reach me in the middle of the night for problems . It was a prototype, not a product, but the experience we made with it has generated the QX. We had strong problems and probably, from what we analyzed after the stop from all the components, it was close to die in short time after the end of the test. It was not ready to be a product, but it was a dam good prototype, by means of which an enormous experience has been made
So what happened to the "plants" (LOL) sold to the US Military back in 2011 or 2012? Not to mention the robotic factories, the plant in Scandinavia, the certificators for the home ecat, and on and on? Rossi's excuses are classic. Sean McCarthy, Carl Tilley and Dennis Lee all made similar ones to explain why their wonders of free energy were never independently tested and were never on the market. After years of absorbing investor money, of course.
Henry (exposed here)"
I'm looking forward to when Henry Truth publishes his mainstream science on Kindle
Following your theory about LENR have you (not Holmlid) built a device that produces a COP >1 ?
Good grief! Enough already. We get it. You will only accept results from a device you have hand carried to the lab as everybody else are lying idiots.
Henry (exposed here)"
I'm looking forward to when Henry Truth publishes his mainstream science on Kindle
When bocijn?
When I will see a Nobel prize assigned to the e-cat inventor and e-cat available on the shelves at any supermarket. 
It was my impression that IH purchased the "1MW" plant as a product, not a prototype. The 1 year test was to commence as immediately as possible in the US to demonstrate the effectiveness and readiness of the product. The $89 million was for proof of the viability of a product, demonstrated by 1 year of operation.
Henry Truth "When I will see a Nobel prize"
The Nobel Prize is not about commercialisation...the inventor(s) of the machine that you are typing on was never awarded the Nobel Prize
Good grief! Enough already. We get it. You will only accept results from a device you have hand carried to the lab as everybody else are lying idiots.
Really AA you get? It seems you are sure and you know him very good.
So if you don't trust of me you can talk with him asking to make available a working device for the next prize at Stockholm.
Henry Truth "When I will see a Nobel prize"
The Nobel Prize is not about commercialisation...the inventor(s) of the machine that you are typing on was never awarded the Nobel Prize
Commercialization of what ? Of Rossi's says?
The Nobel Prize is not about the commercialisation of anything.
including the commercialisation of Henry Truth's Voodoo Science on Kindle
ROTFWL! Like Rossi will allow anyone who knows how to do it to perform a black box or any other definitive test!
I think this is one of Rossi's greatest weaknesses. He ought to allow the MFMP to complete a black box test.
"one of Rossi's greatest weaknesses."
What he ought to and what he does are very different things.
The Nobel Prize is not about the commercialisation of anything.
The Nobel Prize is not about commercialisation...the inventor(s) of the machine that you are typing on was never awarded the Nobel Prize
False that Nobel prize conflicts with commercialization! it's a your fairy tale you spread.
For example Guglielmo Marconi received Nobel prize in Physics 1909 "in recognition of their contributions to the development of wireless telegraphy".
He was a famous inventor, he founded a large company: Wireless Telegraph & Signal Company Limited or Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. Ltd that commercialized a lot of transmission equipments under his patents.
False that Nobel prize conflicts with commercialization! it's a your flam.
As usual l you are wrong Marconi was credited with inventing radio and developing it.
He got the Nobel prize for that not his commercial operation of it.
"The Nobel Prize in Physics 1909 was awarded jointly to Guglielmo Marconi and Karl Ferdinand Braun "in recognition of their contributions to the development of wireless telegraphy"
"For example Guglielmo Marconi received Nobel prize in Physics 1909."
True.
http://www.nature.com/articles/nmat2602
Are you Italian ,too, Henry Truth.
Graci
Henry. You are really trolling now. And your comments on Nobel Prizes show your total ignorance of the topic - both science and how it works, and in particular Nobel Prizes are awarded. Marconi was a brilliant Italian product of the University of Bologna, but he got his Nobel for theory, not for his commercial nous. Even though Tesla always claimed that he was 'first'.
Non commercial? For example, 2016's Nobel Prize in physics was awarded to three men, who, in the 1970s and 1980s, explained the very weird thing that happen to matter when you squish it down to a flat plane, or cool it down to near absolute zero. Half the prize went to David Thouless of the University of Washington, and the other half was split between Duncan Haldane of Princeton University and J. Michael Kosterlitz of Brown. All the laureates were born in the UK. The prize is a reward for their theoretical work, said Thors Hans Hansson, a Nobel committee member, at the Nobel announcement. “It has combined beautiful mathematics and profound physics insights, and achieved unexpected results that has been confirmed by experiments,” Hansson said.
No commercial products yet, although the fundamental work for which they were awarded the prize was performed 40 years ago.
As usual l you are wrong Marconi was credited with inventing radio and developing it.
He got the Nobel prize for that not his commercial operation of it.
As usual you don't know the hystory. He invented and he was a pioneer of wireless telegraphy, (you wrote radio) exactly the same field of Nobel quotation.
Quote
"The Nobel Prize in Physics 1909 was awarded jointly to Guglielmo Marconi and Karl Ferdinand Braun "in recognition of their contributions to the development of wireless telegraphy"
Jointly with another makes some difference? is it not a Nobel to him?
Henry. You are really trolling now. And your comments on Nobel Prizes show your total ignorance of the topic - both science and how it works, and in particular Nobel Prizes are awarded. Marconi was a brilliant Italian product of the University of Bologna, but he got his Nobel for theory, not for his commercial nous. Even though Tesla always claimed that he was 'sirst'.
Alain who said that Marconi received the Nobel for his commercial nous ? Me?
I said that the two things (Nobel and commercialization) are not in conflict.
Read better what it has been written before talk of trolling or give ignorant to anyone.
QuoteNo commercial products yet, although the fundamental work for which they were awarded the prize was performed 40 years ago.
It can happen, where is the news?
