Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion

Before NASA wastes too much of their precious R&D on buggy wip technology, it is time for the Quark to take center stage in powering space exploration and settlement. Replacing the fission heat source in Kilopower is a no brainer. Safety Certification is obviously not required for this technology and the R&D resources of NASA can be used to jumpstart the LENR reactor home use business when a LENR Kilopower based product is eventually configured. Rossi should get some NASA engineers over to his demo.Once they see the Quark in action, they will configure Kilopower property with a LENR heat source.

Quote from maryyugo

I don't know if Jed's statement was actionable

Exactly. His comments haven't affected me a whit. However they could have if I had for example submitted a proposal for funding and had it denied due to the 'questions' Jed's comments raise about my reliability. But I'm primarily an industrial chemist, so I don't do a whole lot of that, and what I do is not based on my experience with CF. So no libel suits upcoming...(Darn, I could really use some extra money....to tune up my Lamborghini that I got for fighting the CFers...(not))

https://tec.grc.nasa.gov/rps/s…anced-stirling-convertor/

NASA's new sterling heat convertor for is a highly efficient, low mass, reliable power convertor for future Radioisotope Power Systems (RPS)

(38% greater than 80 W output power), low mass (1.3 kg), hermetic sealing.

See Kilopower post #2260.

Quote from maryyugo

Where can I buy what Axil is smoking?

Hey Axil, have you ever *seen* a working "quarkqx" or whatever Rossi calls his deception currently? Have you tested it? How did you test it and what were your results? If you did not test it, how in the hell do you know?

Realization of Rossi's LENR tech is what the DEMO is for. Rossi would not publicly show his system unless it worked 100%.

Quote from axil

Rossi would not publicly show his system unless it worked 100%.

ROFL!

Quote from kirkshanahan

If you actually did, you did so without comprehension, otherwise, you never would have made that prior comment.

Ah yes, sorry, I forgot - you know best about everything, especially subjective matters where your own obvious bias prevents a dispassionate analysis.

In other words, go suck me.

Quote from Zeus46

In other words, go suck me.

In other words, you can't substantiate your claims and thus they are as libelous as Rothwell's.

Quote from maryyugo

I don't know if Jed's statement was actionable (maybe our occasional legal eagle visitors do) but to show it's true, you'd have to have a psychiatric expert show that Shanahan attends to delusions.

He's deluded about how the First Law of Thermodynamics works, at the very least...

Quote from kirkshanahan

In other words, you can't substantiate your claims and thus they are as libelous as Rothwell's.

I haven't actually reread it yet. That was my conclusion from the last reading. I'll let you know when I do.

My overriding memory of the previous reading was amusement at the fact you later made/still make such a song and dance about the other authors ignoring your arguments, despite having done exactly the same in your response to them. You are right that they do ignore parts - but that's no excuse for hypocrisy.

Quote from kirkshanahan

ROFL!

Yes. it is exciting. It puts a smile on your lips.

Quote from maryyugo

It's no different in character from calling a participant moron or an idiot to their face.

Apart from the fact that one is a request, and the other two are insults.

Quote from Zeus46

whilst having done exactly the same in your response to them

Make sure you substantiate that. Note also that as *I* recall, I only answered *their* comments, not the whole field's, but 10 of the prominent CF authors is a large chunk of them in the section on the answer to the 10 authors' Reply. Now the other parts of the whitepaper actually address other issues, like errors in the F&P calorimetric methodology, errors in their HAD claims, errors in Kitamura, et al's claims, and errors in Krivit's commentary on my J Env. Mon. comment. It will be interesting to see what you think I ignored...

Quote from axil

Yes. it is exciting. It puts a smile on your lips.

Yeah, you and Jed need to keep it up, my floor is getting really clean from the polishing action.

Quote from kirkshanahan

Yeah, you and Jed need to keep it up, my floor is getting really clean from the polishing action.

Fear not, the rollicking excitement that the quark will generate is just beginning. Try to keep your feet, control yourself, Quark exuberance can be dangerous if taken to extremes.