Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion

Quote from Alan Smith

Your guess is entirely right, since (you may have noticed) there were 70 people there, and quite a few were still waiting in line to talk with Rossi hours after the demo finished. And he was only available on that day. The whole event was tightly managed. I had a chance to talk with Fulvio Fabiani, but we were discussing E-Cats. Some helpful info for replicators there, which needs to be sorted out.

not a guess Alan,

After 7 years of this charade, can anyone anywhere believe anything this guy presents? I do not.

I called it right just before you left, he controlled the audience, the presentation, the test, the results and the questioning.

Now maybe you’re not a Rossi stooge

But you were not allowed to verify anything

Or even ask questions, Rossi made sure of that, you were simply window dressing,

a credible source to add credibility where there is absolutely none.

He could have stayed for days answering questions but he didn’t, why not?

(It’s rhetorical, please don’t answer).

Nothing conclusive, same old Steaming raft of turd from senor Rossi.

Yet still his minions line up to applaud him

and dream up myriad excuses for his failures.

I feel as though having Rossi direct the whole research and development of his LENR based device as slow and not very productive. How long has it been, some 7 to 8 years and we're still stuck trying to control the device.

Does anyone else feel that Rossi is either not competent enough or is just stifling progress?

Roseland67

I look 7 years behind this discussion with Rossi and I can't understand, you grudge millions which give Rossi on researches or you are patriots from science... It is given money investors and what to take them, it is necessary to work too! I know that Rossi's theory is processes in volcanoes, volcanoes are formed due to terrestrial electricity which is supported by excess heat - LENR! It is necessary to be engaged, unite and look for business new energy. Oil is blood of the planet Earth and its production leads to global climate change! There comes the planet climax Earth.

From JONP:

Quote

Prof

November 27, 2017 at 6:20 AM

Dr Andrea Rossi:

I watched the two videos of the complete demo of Stockolm and I think you made a very convincing test. It has been very convincing for the water flow, for the measurements of the temperatures and for the measurements of the electric energy consumed.

I think you have made a masterpiece and all the experts I have spoken with agree with me.

Congratulations.

Display More

Ok, when the Prof says so... then the “test” must have been a masterpiece!

BTW: After watching the DPS, does anyone think that anybody beside Rossi or Fabiani (e.g. Gullström, Hurley) ever made his own measurements on the QuarkX - with his own instruments and not directed by Rossi?

If not, what does this tell us about the credibilities of the QuarkX claims?

It seems the only ones who have a clue about the "box under the paper box" are Rossi and Fabiani. It is so rediculous to see this on the table during the show. Only this detail of their setup and their behaviour speaks a thousand words on this presentation and should make people suspicious on what there was going on. What hey try to hide from the eyes of the audience? Maybe Rossis "IP"? Or just Sigma < 2?

• Andrea Rossi December 1, 2017 at 7:53 PM

  Colin Watters:

  You must distinguish the specific situations if you want to make a serious analysis.

  One thing is to make a new car or a new electronic device in the context of an already
  well consolidated industry that already produces massively cars or electronic devices.
  A completely different situation is to make an industry to produce massively a new apparatus starting from zero.
  
  By the way, your information is very particular, because the CEO of one of the major car manufacturer of the world told me that to put on the road a new concept car it takes between 10 and 20 years ( from a consolidated car manufacturer ).

  
  Warm Regards,

  A.R.

  (emphasis added)

Realy?! It takes 10 to 20 years?

e.g. from a mayor car company:

Golf I (Typ 17) (1974–1983)

So, the development of the Golf Modell 1 startet in 1964? Or in 1954?

Golf II (Typ 19E) (1983–1992)

Golf III (Typ 1H) (1991–1997)

Golf IV (Typ 1J) (1997–2003)

Golf V (Typ 1K) (2003–2008)

Golf VI (Typ 1K) (2008–2012)

Golf VII (Typ AU) (2012- ...)

Today, the average time for a car sold to customers in Europe is 7 to 8 years incl. facelifts. Normally, facelifts are done 4 years after the SOP.

Development of a car from concept to Start of Production (SOP), incl. the production lines and really EVERYTHING) takes about 4 years.

I'm doing automotive development since 20 years for mayor car companies and it really hurts me, to read such nonsense

The time to market (SOP) of the QX may of course be much longer, because of the new materials that have been invented

by Dott. Rrossi. And also this sooooo complex PSU problem. And the certification of an unknown nuclear for industrual use.

Uhhh, that will take time and MONEY!

Quote from Shane D.

Of course, most of the planet knows there will never be a product at all, for obvious reasons.

What would those reasons be?

Because Rossis history full of fraud and lies simply speaks for itself. If you want, go figure and read back in this forum many years - or just look up at the court documents...

The human civilization doesn't work so smoothly, yugo. For example the Japanese had patents for flat screen LCD displays from the end of 80's prepared. But the didn't utilize them, because it would burrow their own investments to existing CRT screens. And at the case of fossil fuels of volatile price the economy is even more straightforward: the more the people responsible will delay fossil fuel replacement, the more money they will make with it. It's simple calculus - nothing forces them into investments into breakthrough findings, on the contrary - they can only lose with it.

We can just wait, how many billions will get this guy, who promises to generate 100 kWh from square meter of graphene.

Quote from maryyugo

He seems to be getting a modest budget to do what appears to be legitimate research. However, the concept of getting energy from molecular motion seems to violate the second law of thermodynamics so it's pretty improbable that it will perform as claimed and be a practical energy source.

So... A professor of physics thinks there is "strong evidence that the motion of graphene could indeed be used as a source of clean, limitless energy", but esteemed internet ****-**** Mary Yugo reckons the professor must be wrong, because of umm.. the second law of thermodynamics, or something...

Perhaps Mary should consider that the 2nd Law only applies at macroscopic scales, and more importantly, closed systems and not say things like:

Quote from maryyugo

I try to stick with what I understand.

Because it's pretty clear that he doesn't understand the limits of what he does understand....