I do not trust the judgment of the early testers (Penon, Lewan, the Lugano group). I get the sense that they are both invested in the results they reported, in terms of their reputations, and that hope clouds their objectivity, especially in specific cases. So I am pessimistic. But I lack more than very vague information about what they've done since their public reports, and I am always open to surprises that might change my assessment. One impression of mine I doubt will change: Rossi is allergic to rigorous testing.
Rossi's performance in the Doral show casts a pall over the prospect that he has anything.