He demoed the QX and showed a COP of 3 if I remember.
Nothing of what he showed can be called convincing in my eyes.
He demoed the QX and showed a COP of 3 if I remember.
Nothing of what he showed can be called convincing in my eyes.
He demoed the QX and showed a COP of 3 if I remember.
not really, the COP was not shown since he did not directly measure the input power.
IMHO, IH was out to screw Rossi over and Rossi knew it. And IH were morons because they added nothing to the development of the E Cat. The main goal in the IH business plan was to get investment funding by using the E Cat as bait. Rossi's new partner may be committed in developing a product that is marketable.
In fact, I suspect the the customer developed the SK reactor because Rossi was not motivated to do that development which essentially made the QX redundant. Rossi has hooked up with a big time system's integrator. Any battling by competitors with Rossi are now useless. Rossi is under the protective wing of a powerful industrial and commercial power.
not really, the COP was not shown since he did not directly measure the input power.
The COP calculation was presented at 2:44:30 of the demo. the COP was 488.
William S Hurley did the COP measurement as director from Senior project engineering
Please don't call it a demo. Every decent demo must feel ashamed if you put it in the same basket as the stockholm event.
Please don't call it a demo. Every decent demo must feel ashamed if you put it in the same basket as the stockholm event.
I learned a great deal from that demo. It showed me how the QX worked.
Nothing of what he showed can be called convincing in my eyes.
The Demo revealed a wealth of information to my eyes more than Rossi would ever want revealed.
I learned a great deal from that demo. It showed me how the QX worked.
Well, good for you. Tell Dewey what you learned. IH is eager to learn.
IMHO, IH was out to screw Rossi over and Rossi knew it.
IMHO Rossi learned that IH wasn't the right partner regarding expertise and experience.
IMHO, IH was out to screw Rossi over and Rossi knew it. And IH were morons because they added nothing to the development of the E Cat. The main goal in the IH business plan was to get investment funding by using the E Cat as bait. Rossi's new partner may be committed in developing a product that is marketable.
In fact, I suspect the the customer developed the SK reactor because Rossi was not motivated to do that development which essentially made the QX redundant. Rossi has hooked up with a big time system's integrator. Any battling by competitors with Rossi are now useless. Rossi is under the protective wing of a powerful industrial and commercial power.
There is no good proof of what you say. As far as I know, IH incorporated Rossi as well as other LENR players and consider them as their team, in such an organisation one help out securing for example IP rights. I simply think that rossi didn't like this setup and was a bit paranoid and decided that he was fooled and had to "fight back" to get his rights back. At least that is another possible narrative and I say it is stefan says because it can be as true as the Axil's says or Rossi say's. But I choose to expose a less evil interpretation of people in this mess (on both sides).
The COP calculation was presented at 2:44:30 of the demo. the COP was 488.
William S Hurley did the COP measurement as director from Senior project engineering
and where is the simultaneous measurement of the input current and voltage across the device? If the input is not measured then the COP statements are just xxxxxxx.
Well, good for you. Tell Dewey what you learned. IH is eager to learn.
The old school LENR developers that IH might well be currently supporting will doubtless still beleive that LENR is cold fusion. It is near impossible to move those firmly set minds to a proper perspective.
Wow - hit a nerve dead center. The old swarm and spam system kicks back in just like old times. So familiar.. so entertaining.
Where do we want to walk the mortar next?
and where is the simultaneous measurement of the input current and voltage across the device? If the input is not measured then the COP statements are just xxxxxxx.
The purpose of the demo was to entice new partners to the E Cat development effort. This demo has done that job and the partner seems to be of very high quality.
axil, the partner knows, we don't have any proof, everything can just be a puff puff of words from my perspective. IH at least gives a trail of real work which you call old school
New school is currently just an imagination so I prefer old school with the exsemption of what Randell Mills and BrLP is doing.
This demo has done that job and the partner seems to be of very high quality.
If you say so who am I to doubt this...
But of course - a partner seemingly of very high quality. Wonder what ABB stands for on Planet Rossi?
I'm ready for the next Johnson Marley.
Rossi said that? Where did you see it?
I think it was in an interview with Mats Lewan. Remember Rossi didn't let on that the heat was from just the four Tiger Cats until well into the test.
But of course - a partner seemingly of very high quality. Wonder what ABB stands for on Planet Rossi?
I'm ready for the next Johnson Marley.
Rossi's money must be coming from somebody. Building a prototype turbine is not cheap.
That is not true.
What is not true? All the critics have to say, over and over again, is that nothing works. Hardly adds anything to the discussion does it?