Why would a reputable newspaper or journal publish a story that something that is universally believed to not work doesn't work, as expected?
There are plenty of people who would delight in writing something negative about Rossi. Ethan Siegal for example.
Logic never was your strong point. There is no point in discussing this: the babblers will always come up with a reason not to bet They knpw they may well be wrong.
I would be happy to add "reputab;e " to th company. It won't make any difference.