Nuclear reactions in plasmas

  • A new Arxiv preprint -- perhaps of interest.


    "Nuclear Fusion in Laser-Driven Counter-Streaming Collisionless Plasmas"


    ABSTRACT: Nuclear fusion reactions are the most important processes in nature to power stars and produce new elements, and lie at the center of the understanding of nucleosynthesis in the universe. It is critically important to study the reactions in full plasma environments that are close to true astrophysical conditions. By using laser-driven counter-streaming collisionless plasmas, we studied the fusion D+ D→n+ 3 He in a Gamow-like window around 27 keV. The results show that astrophysical nuclear reaction yield can be modulated significantly by the self-generated electromagnetic fields and the collective motion of the plasma. This plasma-version mini-collider may provide a novel tool for studies of astrophysics-interested nuclear reactions in plasma with tunable energies in earth-based laboratories.


    https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.03951

  • Very interesting.
    The figure 4 verifies me one apect I have figure out my self by observing thermosphere.


    The number of ions is important. You can express this number also as a pressure.
    As everything is finally only kinetic movement, the pressure in constant temperature means lower number of particles.


    This low number is needed, that have time for the particles which are fusioning to rearrange to a stabile form.
    My work is not yet so ordered, cause I don't have too much time to put in to it; but if interest, here is it;
    https://www.researchgate.net/p…/QED-Theory-of-everything

  • By using laser-driven counter-streaming collisionless plasmas, we studied the fusion D+ D→n+ 3 He in a Gamow-like window around 27 keV.


    Very interesting.
    The figure 4 verifies me one apect I have figure out my self by observing thermosphere.



    Nice to see that also the classical physicists start to make more useful experiments. But as said: The experiment is classical and produces a lot of neutrons, we don't like to see and also tritium will be one of the results - we definitely don't like.
    But if they can improve Gammov theory by adding something like an incident frequency term, then its certainly of some use!

  • Quote

    But if they can improve Gammov theory by adding something like an incident frequency term, then its certainly of some use!


    Oh. wow. Thanks! I didn't even knew about this before;
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…shortcoming_of_the_theory


    But it's exactly my thought, and I added just only one new -and simple- aspect, and I got over the main shortcoming; that there isn't any "five" or "eight"!


    I even wen't further, and made all too-short-lived "forbidden", like Di-proton or what ever having less than 1^-15 sec half life.


    And I got the whole nuclesynthesis-chain to work. Up to Plutonium.
    Well, there was few interesting things, like I even found an simple Idea to explain the isomer Tantalum-180-m1,
    .. and other problematic isotopes like Na-22, Al-26, Mn-53, V-50.


    Here's my working paper of the whole nucleosynthesis-chain;
    https://www.researchgate.net/p…187_Nucleosynthesis_chain


    And here's the text draft;
    https://www.researchgate.net/p…ory_of_everything_-Chemie


    So. the new aspect, is a simple rule of Newtonian collision;
    If two objects of a same mass and velocity collide, the collision angle can be anything, and these two objects always continues to move in same direction with same velocity.
    -> They remain "attached".


    This means only nucleis with same Mass number can have fusion without excessive free neutron/proton produktion.


    The Last aspect needed, is that the "Pressure" must be low. This simply means that the two particles requires a certain time to go through "transition" to really produce a stabile structure of the bundle of protons and neutrons which have found their way togehter. So in some time after the first collision, there can't be second collision, or the process is disturbed. -> low pressure is needed.


    And this explains the wierd isotopes; if they decay through neutron capture during this transition time, the product is "wierd" I mean there is no way you can produce V-50 through a simple Gammov-theory. Cause it's surrounded by stabile isotopes.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.