Bose condensation as a force multiplier.

Reference:

Quote

http://www.forbes.com/sites/st…fundamental/#3f1de76539d9

Emergent Gravity and the Dark Universe, by Erik Verlinde

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.02269v2.pdf

What Erik Verlinde is postulating is that reality is quantum information and its structure changes the way gravity behaves at the large scale of galaxies.
What defines the structure of quantum information locally is quantum entanglement and wormholes(EPR=ER proposal… J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, “Cool horizons for entangled black holes,” Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013) 781, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1306.0533v2.pdf).

In the context of quantum information theory, what charges the way gravity works is entanglement on the local scale. Simply said, entanglement can change the way a force: gravity preforms it function.

Under the context of the same quantum information theory, the same mechanism could be at work in LENR where entanglement on the local scale can change the way the electromagnetic, electroweak, and strong forces interact.

In an entangled Bose condensate, where the electroweak and strong forces would not be coupled sufficiently strongly to converge to a more unified force as defined by their respective Running coupling constants; entanglement modifies the way the forces usually behave in a untangled environment so that the coupling constants of the three forces would come together far more quickly in and entangled state as opposed to a untangled environment.

In this entangled environment, the proton can decay even if the strength of the EMF forces involved is far below what the potency of the unification of forces would usually take to destabilize the proton.

Entanglement acts like a force multiplier whereby the electromagnetic and the electroweak forces can come together at a far lower energy level in the situation where a nuclear reaction takes place under the entangled influence of a Bose condensate.

Reference:

Quote

http://www.nature.com/news/the…rce-of-space-time-1.18797

The quantum source of space-time

Many physicists believe that entanglement is the essence of quantum weirdness — and some now suspect that it may also be the essence of space-time geometry.

At the beginning of the big bang, Computational complexity was at its minimum and quantum entanglement was at its maximum. The entire universe was completely entangled, it was a bose condensate. This was the time when all the forces were combined in a grand unification to operated as a single force. As the universe expanded and cooled, entanglement decreased and Computational complexity increased. The four fundamental forces began to diverge and the running coupling constants of those fundamental forces also began to diverge.

When spacetime returns to the entangled state that the universe was initially in, the fundamental forces return to the way that they were at the beginning of the big bang and the single global fundamental force is reestablished.

In this restored state of space/time simplicity, the LENR reaction is manifest.

Quote from AlainCo

Michael McCulloch analysed that theory (quickly) and have seen that it does not explains rotation anomalies of dwarf galaxies.

I am more positive as I think that finally ideas behind MiHsC or entanglement may fuel theory that merge QM and gravitation/GR

It has also been discovered that dwarf galaxies are embedded in a Bose condinsate. Did Michael McCulloch consider the effects of this source of increased entanglement in these type galaxies? It could be all in the details.

Quote

http://scitechdaily.com/reinte…bose-einstein-condensate/
The Reinterpretation of Cold Dark Matter as a Bose-Einstein Condensate

http://www.nature.com/nphys/jo…10/n7/full/nphys2996.html
Cosmic structure as the quantum interference of a coherent dark wave

Anyone who want to understand LENR through experimentation is well served by doing laser irradiation of gold nanoparticles in a solution of a salt of a radioactive isotope as Andreev has done.

A comment on the The Andreev paper

https://docviewer.yandex.com/?url=ya-disk-public%3A%2F%2FEbmap0TnH1DTMjesWpChaPzNGaipiW%2ByItHnSB4SPXA%3D&name=%D0%90%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B5%D0%B2_%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%B9%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B5 %D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5 Cs-137_%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80 %D0%A0%D0%A3%D0%94%D0%9D 24_11_2016.pdf&c=58387351efa1

using laser ablation for quenching the radioactivity of Cs-137.

Using laser light conversion to a coherent magnetic field through the interaction of coherent laser photons and gold nanoparticles shows how the LENR reaction works.

The LENR reaction is mediated by an amplified weak force. The production of a coherent magnetic field through the use of laser light irradiating gold nanoparticles greatly strengthens the weak force.

LENR is a consequence of the amplified strength levels of the weak force that existed at the beginning of the cosmos where it reaches grand unification strength levels. At these immense levels of strength, protons and neutrons decay into strange matter mesons.

A.V. Simakin has also produced a full range of laser based irradiation of gold nanoparticle experiments that show accelerated weak force activity including stabilization of radioactive isotopes, fusion and fission.

see

https://scirate.com/search?q=au:Simakin_A+in:physics

A comment on the following paper in Russian
A.I. Laptukhov"The possible mechanism of the quenching of the radioactivity of the isotope Cs137

http://lenr.seplm.ru/articles/…ioaktivnogo-izotopa-cs137

Among other things, this paper remarks about the steady production of gamma radiation even when the rate of stabilization of the isotope CS137 is accelerated by some 1200 times the expected rate. The decay of Cs137 is an exothermic process; excess energy would be expected to be generated from the conversion of the unstable isotope to the stable daughter decay product.

Where does all that energy produced by the stabilization of the isotope go?

At the most basic level, I have always expected that LENR is a result of a single foundational mechanism, namely the accelerated action of the weak force under the catalytic effect of quantum coherence.

This decay process should always produce positive energy. But in this particular case, no excess energy appears, so the energy flow away from the reaction is not detected.

Holmlid faced this issue in the early stages of his experiments where there was an expectation of a large amount of energy production that did not become apparent. Holmlid finally detected the production of sub-atomic particles that formed a chain of decay from strange matter based mesons through kaons, pions, muons, and finally electrons.

Under the single cause of LENR posit, the same thing might be happening in this laser based experiment. Muons may be coming off the gold nanoparticles as a result of an energy storage mechanism inherent in the LENR reaction.

In more detail, this energy storage mechanism may be centered on the Surface Plasmon Polaritons (SPP) produced by the laser photons as they interact with the surface of the gold nanoparticles. The gamma radiation coming off the decaying Cs137 isotope might be absorbed by the SPPs and stored until enough energy is accumulated to produce strange matter mesons that eventually decay to hard to detect muons that distribute the weak force based decay reaction energy to the far field.

This process of particle production from stored energy is called Hadronization

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadronization

An experimental method that might show this energy migration path is to detect muons using the Holmlid method or place the Cs137 salt solution with gold nanoparticles in a cloud chamber and look for charged particle tracks coming of the isotope solution as it is being irradiated with laser light.

The detection of muons would point to an amplified weak force reaction catalyzed through nanoplasmonic based laser induced coherence.

http://phys.org/news/2016-12-verlinde-theory-gravity.html

Verlinde’s new theory of gravity passes first test

Bye Bye dark matter

Verlinde's theory seeks to replace Einstein's theory of gravity with a theory that large scale and all pervasive entanglement in space time increases the strength of gravity by many times.

This insight into the way fundamental forces behave is important for the theory of LENR because at one time when the Cosmos was just beginning, gravity, the nuclear strong force, and the electroweak force were combined into a single fundamental force. At that initial time, the entire universe was entangled as a single coherent entity.

Over time as the universe cooled, the unified fundamental force separated into four separate forces that we know today. By understanding the way gravity is now behaving informs us about how the other forces are behaving. As the twig is bent so shall the tree grow. All the four separate forces still behave as they once did when they first were created. Quantum Entanglement is still having a profound and formative effect on the other forces as they once did when the Cosmos first began during grand unification.

Superconductivity and quantum entanglement through coherence is still strengthening the weak force just as it once did when it was combined in the nascent universe with gravity in grand unification.

In this way at looking at things, LENR is an emergent behavior of high temperature superconductivity. LENR is the child of coherent entanglement.

This insight is not new. J. Schwinger understood this behavior from the very beginning of LENR theory.

J. Schwinger understood the role of coherence as recorded in the "Nuclear Energy in an Atomic Lattice", in The First Annual Conference on Cold Fusion. 1990.

Quote

“This representation of the overall probability, per unit time, as the product of two independent factors, may be true enough under the circumstances of hot fusion. But in very low energy cold fusion one deals essentially with a single state, or wave function, all parts of which are coherent. It is not possible to totally isolate the effect of the electric forces from that of the nuclear forces.”

Schwinger recognized that the electric and nuclear force were unified in action when the coherent LENR condition is in effect.

Quote

External Content www.youtube.com

Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.

Display all external content

Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

Erik Verlinde - The Hidden Phase Space of Our Universe

In the video above, there is a description of the emergence of adiabatic reaction forces as applied to phase spaces. This adiabatic reaction force goes in the direction of phase space increase. in coherence, phase space chance is slow and this condition increases the adiabatic reaction forces in the presence of coherence when a rapidly varying condition is incorporated into the slow phase space.

For example high pressure will move in the direction of low pressure and the same for temperature.

When a non coherent item is incorporated in a bose condensate an adiabatic reaction force is created. This is also known as a born oppenheimer force.

The Bose condensate can be considered a system with minimum entropy because it has just one state. A system that is moved into the condensate has a high state of entropy relative to the condensate. There will be a force that emerges that equalizes the two systems to a new minimum phase state.

This thermalization process is where the weak force amplification comes from.

In this video, an explanation of how the fundamental forces emerge from phase space considerations.

Bose condensation effects the way virtual particles behave inside it.

In a vacuum, light photons move from one virtual particle to the next at a constant average rate determined by the rate of creation/destruction cycle of the virtual particles contained in the condensate. Bose condensation appears to affect that average creation/destruction cycle of virtual particles so that light is greatly slowed down as it moves through the condinsate.

The condinsate gives the photons an effective mass.

In this video referenced above (

) at about 19:00, there is mention of the first order correction of the phase space related to rapid change of states and resulting eigenvalue crossing. This is called Berry Phase. This first order state is an electromagnetic force which turns out to be a magnetic force described as a dirac monopole.

It has been shown experimentally that the Surface Plasmon polariton produces a magnetic monopole field. This may indicate that the SPP is a LENR capable bose condinsate that projects it entangled property using this monopole Berry phase field.

See

Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf

In general, any Bose Condensate that is changing with eigenvalues overlap being in a state of nonequilibrium will produce a Berry phase direct monopole field.

Based on symmetry, from what has been seen in LENR experiments like the golden ball demo by Cravens that a anisotropic magnetic field produced by a rare earth magnet can produce a state of bose condinsation and a LENR effect.

Quote from Alan Smith

Hi Axil. I ca't really get my head around this magnetic monopole stuff- it sounds like 'one hand clapping' to me. Can you explain how such a particle can exist and be proven to do so? (as simply as possible please). Or -seeing as you are the master here -point me to a link with a reasonable account of these things?

Try this

google: bose condensate monopole

you will find a ton of references connecting bose condinsation with monopoles

one reference that may be easy to understand as follows:

http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2…monopoles-discovered.html

T

Quote from Zephir_AWT

Whereas the formation of monopole particles and magnetic field can be explained in rather comfortable way - the opposite effect, i.e. the enhancement of cold fusion with external magnetic field poses more intriguing problem - particularly because the intensity of magnetic field of common samarium/neodymium magnets looks quite low for being able to affect the processes at nuclear basis. Maybe it could affect the probability of K-capture at the bottom orbitals, once they become asymmetric with respect to atom nuclei with external magnetic field.

See this post from vortex regarding SmCo5 magnets and LENR

https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-[email protected]/msg108070.html

for some reason, the link does not work but here is the post:

Quote

http://szfyct.en.alibaba.com/p…Mono_Pole_Magnets.htmlThe SmCo magnet is a monopole magnet that concentrates its magnetization axially in the Z direction.

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Russ George wrote:
Give Kiril a call, he is in Utah and generally a friendly guy, though he has
his quirks as opposed to quarks.



From: Axil Axil Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 5:08 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: An experiment you never heard of



SmCo5 has the magic hexagonal crystal structure of active LENR promoters
like metalize hydrogen. The Sm rare earth configures the Co atoms to take on
the hexagonal configuration which directs the preponderance of its magnetic spins along the Z
axis.



Was there a secret magnetic preparation process involved in the production
of LENR active SmCo5? If so I will know what it was.



On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Russ George wrote:

I had the privilege of standing in the parking lot of the hotel where
Chukanov had his demo running for several hours in the company of Martin
Fleischmann fusing some of our little grey cells over that device. Chukanov
answered or at least responded to every single question we posed to him and
we sent many his way. It was a fascinating and captivating demo. Martin was
the kind of man who had insatiable curiosity and not a mean molecule in his
body and showed it in his sincere interest and professorial manner. Chukanov
sent us both away with several large chunks of his metal.

Meanwhile the hundreds of ICCF conference attendees almost entirely shunned
the ‘parking lot demo’ and Chukanov, especially the self-appointed high
priest insiders of cold fusion. There was little but derision and snide
attacks behind Chukanov’s back at the meeting.

After a couple hours in hot afternoon sun with Chukanov and his machine
Martin and I adjorned to the beach and floated for a long time like basking
whales chatting about this and that.

Somewhere in my collection of ‘cold fusion’ holy treasures I have some of
Chukanov’s SmCo5 metal. I think I will dig it out and see if some of the
recent ‘activation’ ideas make it work even better!



From: Jones Beene Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 2:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Vo]:RE: An experiment you never heard of



Aha – so that’s where Dennis Cravens probably got the idea to use SmCo in
his famous NI Week Demo. Notably, samarium has a high percentage of
radioactive isotopes which could be activate by fractional hydrogen.

From: Russ George

What about the demo of Chukanov at the ICCF meeting in Hawaii many years
ago. In large cylinders crushed and powdered SmCo5, magnetic metal, was
cycled with hydrogen loading and deloading and produced kilowatts of
apparent excess heat!

From: Jones Beene

… but wait, there’s more… (best Billy Mays’ tin cup plea)

In another experiment you may not have heard of - from Bockris and
Sundaresan in 1994 - it was shown that magnetic stimulation boosted excess
heat substantially in a Pd-D electrolysis cell. This line of work leads up
to the Letts-Cravens effect – wrt understanding the influence of a magnetic
field on LENR.

“After the cathode had been charged with deuterium for 48 hours at a current
of 80 mA, the cell was placed in the field of a permanent magnet of 200
Gauss strength. The cell electrolyte temperature rose to 5°C above ambient
after 230 seconds. After 576 seconds, the magnet was replaced by two
Neodymium magnets with a 800 Gauss field. The temperature immediately
started increasing and reached 13.5 °C above ambient in about 15 minutes and
remained constant. The temperature returned when the magnet was removed…
[end of Bockris quote]

The $64 question - why isn’t a magnetic field fully employed in the
glow-stick experiments? By “fully employed” it is meant that: yes, the
heater wire does provide a minimal field but increasing the field strength
by an order of magnitude could be beneficial.

… relevant comment: those who do not remember the past cannot benefit from
its insight- paraphrase of famous Santayana quote, which is the logic
behind the LENR-CANR library.

Display More

By the way, Russ Gress has shown that a Rodin coil does not generate of monopole magnetic field.