@Abd Ul-Rahman Lomax after being banned for few days has set up a blog where he state some of his position.
One raised my interest, is a tentative to build a defense for Rossi, an "exercice de style" as we say in french :
The question is interesting. “What arguments can I give in Rossi’s favor?” What I write is what I find, it’s not designed for “favor.” However, it could look that way. So I wondered about the question. Arguments based on what? The evidence that exists only? Can I make up evidence?