Indeed I start getting tired, while most are beyond that state.
This answer goes beyond the scope of that single thread.
Go back to the subject, and talk of the subject, not about meta-communication, about quarrels, and policies.
LENR science, and legal question are enough complex not to discuss about dissusing.
This sub-forum precisely is a place to discuss about the IH-Rossi legal quarrel, not about our quarrels.
Here in that post I kindly refered to a contribution of Abd about possible answers to IH, a technical point, where I expected people to add new ides because Abd is probably not the best attorney of Rossi (Me no more I concede). Nothing more!
Please be shorter or the popular vote will force moderators to be drastic.
Quote less, react less, off-topic less.
We have a bounded reading bandwidth, use it efficiently. A forum is not a peer-reviewed journal, no need to make point to point answers.
If challenged on many points, answer only to key points. It is a forum not an academic debate.
About metacommucation, there is no need to react to insults, even to polite insults or to jokes. Attack mostly destroy the reputation of the author and don't help convincing about topic. Please deescalate, ignore, and go back to topic, and help other to go back to topic.
Even if bitter, a short polite answer will have more impact than a long one, and will be more easily tolerated despite it may break some rule.
- Don't see the evil, don't hear the evil, don't say evil.
- Go straight, quick and short.