EMDrive from perspective of dense aether model

Quote

Subsequent research in Germany, 2016, produced null results when arcing was eliminated in the LN, and measurement errors accounted for due the the EMP of the discharge,, thin film phenomenon non addressed

Thank you for info - but do you have some link for more details? Poher also did many blind experiments with non-superconductive materials (some are even shown at this video) and the impulse he observed was much higher, than any possible error of measurement. BTW Wasn't it Podkletnov's Impulse generator, what you're talking about by now?

Quote

Now that the EmDrive has made its way into the peer-reviewed literature, it falls in range of Tau Zero’s network of scientist reviewers

It doesn't mean very much because the LENR is way better supported with experiments (even with these peer-reviewed ones) and it still never penetrated into mainstream journals. You cannot teach old dog new tricks as Max Planck once wrote: "A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it."

It just means, the skeptics will remain skeptical, no matter what - actually the more, the more arguments they will get (backfire effect)....

Quote

what do you think about null result of Pdkletnov gen? Could it be due to too much shielding. What if they tried to shield equipment instead of radiator?

Possibly, the scalar waves are shielded with ferromagnetics. Also both Podkletnov, both Poher did use carefully crafted Josephson junction as an emitter - not just flat superconductor (compare also here and here). BTW Tajmar was able to replicate the EMDrive effect neither.

See also: 803-Page Collection of Papers on Anti-Gravity Research

The EMDrive is often objected with mainstream physicists with respect to its violation of Noether theorems. There is important to realize, that Noether theorems apply to flat space-time and smooth manifolds only. The photons spreading at proximity of metallic surfaces aren't spreading within fully flat space-time and they get coupled with it. At the proximity of metal surfaces the light is spreading superluminaly (compare the Scharnhorst effect and
Gurther Nimtz experiments - PDF). When photon enters the Cassimir field at the proximity of metallic surface, it essentially behaves like the tachyon there and its forced to radiate excessive energy into outside (analogy of Cherenkov radiation). This behavior is ipso-facto a consequence of Noether theorem and momentum conservation law, just because the space-time is no flat for photons at the metal surface. This also illustrates the mechanism, in which energy of photons gets converted to energy of tachyons (analogy of sound wave generation in water surface analogy of EMDrive, which propel it forward).

The Noether's theorems don't say, that the EMDrive cannot work. These theorems are way more trivial and they essentially say, that the fundamental laws of physics are a manifestations of space-time symmetry in the universe. So if the universe has rotational symmetry, then it must also obey the law of conservation of angular momentum, if it has a time symmetry, then energy must be conserved and so on. So that if EMDrive exhibits thrust without sending any matter into outside, then it must violate Lorentz symmetry of the space-time. Therefore the Noether's theorems are orthogonal to reality of EMDrive in fact - they just imply, that if this drive works, then the Lorentz symmetry of our local space-time must be somehow broken, for example with establishing of magnetic monopoles or with presence of extradimensions (which is the same in essence). This is the actual prediction of Noether's theorems - no less, no more.

This one? It looks quite brief and superficial for me...

Quote

should have they experienced cyclic changes in size due to gravitational waves as LIGO did?

This last study did use a cavity resonating in single direction (three dimensional zero order of equivalence principle violation) - whereas LIGO compares the difference between pair of perpendicular resonators, i.e. the four dimensional 1st order effect (and Hogan's Holometer compares the difference between two pairs of such a resonators, i.e. it attempts for detection of five dimensional 2nd order effects). The passage of gravitational wave would dilate time for both within resonator, both for atomic clock, so no frequency drift should be actually observed. Not to say, that the last experiment wouldn't probably even notify the fast changes which occur during passage of gravitational waves (in the range of few dozens of milliseconds).

According to dense aether model it's possible to detect the gravitational waves with single resonator, but it has to be made of superconductive material or it should be represented with charged capacitor, i.e. potential difference would apply there or it should be placed inside the anapole magnetic field gradient. After then the time runs slightly faster inside the resonator than outside it and this temporal difference would be already sensitive to passage of gravitational wave, which displaces the resonator for a moment.

Quote

Show sources of Your nonsense statement about this

We already talked about it. You can also check 1, 2, 3, 4...