So my question to Dewey now is
Fair enough IHFB,
But my question to you now is....
Where is your answer to the "satisfied customer" Rossi so promoted?
Where is your answer to the (3) plants sold that Rossi so promoted?
Where is your answer to the Director of Engineering (Bass) that Rossi so promoted?
Where is your answer to the "customer making actual production" that Rossi so promoted? (Keep in mind the energy usage for the building left 5KW for ALL other production operations! That JMP could not pay a $800 bill and they had only one part time employee)
Where is your answer to "the customer was owned by a UK entity" that Rossi so promoted?
Where is your answer to "the ERV took many thousands of measurements" that Rossi so promoted?
Where is your answer to "the pressure drop over 3 meters of stated pipe would require a pressure higher than 0"
Where is your answer to "Rossi providing fake invoices to cover JMP's bill"
and on and on and on.
The problem here is :
"Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the huge board in your own eye?"
Why do people ignore that mountains of evidence against this being a legitimate test and come up with quite fanciful "possibilities" to support it is true?
I can state that "theoretically I can time travel if I go fast enough", but it will never happen. (And probably not theoretical either)
Look at the total amount of evidence. Look at everything and add it all up. On one hand, you have logical conclusions about the test being invalid. To make it have a chance of being valid, you have to dream up extremely unlikely scenarios. Think platinum sponge!
I was excited and believed the Rossi story for quite a while. I finally had to wake up and smell the roses. They smelled terrible!
Clicking our heals together 3 times is not going to take us to eCat paradise, not matter how much we want it too.