Thank you for being specific.
There are a few scenarios here that I am a little hesitant to go into, because we don't have all the facts. We also don't know exactly to what extent Industrial Heat has performed their own testing on E-Cat reactors. Without further information -- such as IH releasing their internal testing reports -- it will be challenging to form a completely factual opinion. If IH wants us to believe them that the E-Cat never produced excess heat, then I'd suggest that they provide their test reports when they are legally able to do so. My hope is that to back up such statements they've done long, extensive runs of tests varying individual parameters. I'll also say there are other possibilities which could allow for IH to be mistaken without lying about anything. At this stage, until we get all the data and information, I don't discount any possibility. But, then again, what we think really doesn't matter. Any of our opinions are totally irrelevant to the bigger picture. If those of us who think the E-Cat technology is real have been fooled hook, line, and sinker, then it won't stop a multi-billion dollar IH machine from moving forward in any direction they choose.