Did Dewey suggest that Hank Mills should lawyer up again?
I don't recall. But as I said, threats of litigation and suggestions of threats aren't welcome here.
Rossi vs. Darden developments [CASE CLOSED]
- barty
- Closed
-
-
145 Includes
"Plaintiffs shall serve their supplemental interrogatory answers to Defendant, John
Vaughn's First Set of Interrogatories by February 10, 2017. Such responses shall include all
screen names or aliases Plaintiff Rossi uses to post information on the lnternet. To the extent
Plaintiff Rossi does not use screen names or aliases to post information on the lnternet, he must
issue a response verifying the same. [Tr. 51 :15-52:3]"
-
eric, it sounds like they will have a site visit. Interesting
'
-
I'm pretty sure "Roger" is one of Dewey's screen names. Rossi might want to ask the same of Dewey and any other IH operative who might be posting on forums.
-
Who is in the Domincan Republic?
-
Did somebody say something?
-
Was there a site inspection today, or was it put off until March 2?
-
I'm pretty sure "Roger" is one of Dewey's screen names. Rossi might want to ask the same of Dewey and any other IH operative who might be posting on forums.
Para,
Beat me to it:
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the defendant is permitted to question the
witness set for deposition in this matter on February 22, 2017, in the Dominican
Republic. The plaintiff shall provide the defendant with the name of the attorney for the
witness who is scheduled for deposition in the Dominican RepublicBoeing coming up, Dewey front and center, the Domenican Republic, site visit to Doral coming, IH and Rossi forewarned by the judge, all in a few documents. My heart just can not take this!
-
Display More
But Rossi could have XP as he claimed but he could lose the case due to things like failure to get a signed start date for the test of the Six Cylinder GPT or failure of the ERV to be formally agreed upon by IH, or failure of the ERV to measure the flow of the heated fluid out of the device and so on. It was Ross that brought suit. Remember Rossi must show that IH is guilty by a preponderance of the evidence and IH only has to show that any single critical part of the agreement was not met.
It sure looks like Rossi will have a hard time to prove IH was guilty and IH as a defendant has a much easier time. The US legal system is weighted that way. It "defaults" in favor of the defendant.
XP may be important to "us" but it not the only thing needed to prove the case that Rossi has brought against IH.
As they said- if the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit - Here if the facts don't follow the agreement, they must acquit
But I would not doubt that we will get a better idea after the hearing tomorrow.
If a judge were deciding the case I would be more inclined to agree with you, but that's not the case; a jury will decide. With a Jury trial it all comes down to who has the cleverest and most persuasive attorneys.
-
Well, we have exhausted the flow meter angle with the information so far available. Maybe we could discus now the "elephant in the room"...or, where the 1MW of energy went in that small Doral warehouse? BTW, Doral is almost the same dimensions as my house, so hard for me to imagine how that much energy is accounted for IMO? This has been brought up over and over again on the few LENR forums, especially here, but never answered, accounted for, by the few remaining Rossi supporters.
?
With a jury it won't be where the energy went, but whether it was actually produced or not.
-
If a judge were deciding the case I would be more inclined to agree with you, but that's not the case; a jury will decide. With a Jury trial it all comes down to who has the cleverest and most persuasive. attorneys.
... a jury will decide. Nice to read thousand times repeated repetitions. But WHEN ? -
Display More
IHF. I don't agree. If Rossi has no XP and loses, then he will likely have to sell his condos to make payment back to IH (example fake or hour short on the first $10M deal).
I would expect that IH would just shift that money to those other half a dozen researchers they are now supporting.
After all some of those have promising results (see Dewey's post, if you believe him)
A few million in the right hands could get us well down the LENR research path. I would call that a win. Realize there are more horses in the LENR race other than Rossi. And many of them "have better breeding" for a long race.
to my way of thinking Dewey has lost all credibility at this point. I wouldn't believe him if said the sun rises in the east.
-
You may have missed my point. If Rossi has XP as claimed and loses the case, we all win. If Rossi has XP as claimed and wins the case, we all win. If Rossi has no XP and loses the case, we all lose. If Rossi has no XP and wins the case, we all lose.
The only thing that matters is whether it works. The rest will be footnotes in the history books.
Exactly, unless all you are looking for is revenge either against IH or Rossi depending on your leanings.
-
Did somebody say something
Darn! Somebody went and woke him up.
... a jury will decide. Nice to read thousand times repeated repetitions. But WHEN ?When they get good and ready.
-
I suspect another attack on AR's JONP that takes the site down is long overdue but this time also wipes the server.
-
I'm pretty sure "Roger" is one of Dewey's screen names.
I wish I was an avatar of this great being, who wouldn't want to share Dewey's genius, capacity for hilarious metaphors, endless stream of unassisted inspiration, and burning desire for truth?
Truly a figure to look up to in the quest for a better future on earth
-
It looks to me as if the Notice of hearing (Doc 150) spells trouble for Rossi et al.
Violation of a Protective Order and failure to produce documents as ordered by the court? Tut-tut
Subpoenaed bank records might be interesting too.
-
"...... Defendants’ deposition of Third-Party Defendant J.M. Products, Inc. shall be conducted on March 1, 2017 "
I briefly read over the new documents and found this statement to be somewhat humorous to me!
My understanding is that per this order, on March 1, J.M. Products shall have a disposition conducted...meaning that someone will be
interviewed and questions asked. The question is WHO will that person be! So far I know of only four people actually tied to J.M. Products in the various documents I have reviewed. Johnson, Bass, Johnson's wife and Johnson's daughter (?).
So it will be interesting, if this disposition has any interviews made public, who "SPEAKS" for J.M. Products. Since many on this forum (me included) think the evidence so far seen, indicates that J.M. Products is a shell company and has no real operations, it will be interesting to see who and what this disposition brings.
Seems like Mr. Johnson is in double jeopardy! It appears he might be the only one legally responsible for J.M. Products AND he is listed individually as a third party defendant! The seat of his britches must be feeling quite warm by now!
-
Several new documents now on the docket:
Hi all,
Interesting stuff on the docket!
I'm away from my computer this week and don't feel up to systematically summarizing the new documents by typing on my cell phone.
So if anyone wants to take a stab at it, (or divide and conquer), be my guest.
Also, Abd may do this, and generally does a more thorough and unbiased (if a little more wordy) job than I.
Cheers!
-
Jury, remember that for Rossi to prevail in the case against IH, he will have to have a unanimous verdict by the jury.
I can see it now. In the closing arguments IH's lawyer puts a 1kW room heater on the rail of the jury box and turns it on. He says something like: imagine not one but 1000 of these filling the courtroom with only one small window open. You would notice, you would be VERY uncomfortable. Yet they want you to think that people would work like normal and it would go unnoticed.
Now when you go to the jury room to deliberate, imagine it is April 26,2015 during the time of the test here in Miami where the temperature was 97 F and a humidity of 75%. Yet in the jury room there are about a hundred of these heaters that have been on high for 24/7 for months. How long will it take you to come to a decision that they were on. Surely at least one of you will have the common sense to know it was hot. I hope you come to quick decision that Rossi has not proven his attacks against IH. It only takes one of you to say no and you can leave that room.
