If you are all so sure Rossi is a scammer, you should not be so nervous about every person who posts in this thread with a pro-Rossi pov. Jefferson said: "When I hear another express an opinion, which is not mine, I say to myself, he has a right to his opinion, as I to mine. Why should I question it? His errors does no injury, and shall I become a Don Quixote to bring all men by force of argument to one opinion? If a fact be misstated, it is probable be gratified by a belief of it, and I have no rights to deprive him of the gratification...".
The IH story is not persuasive. None gives 10 million of dollars to obtain a mere IP "promise". IH people had their assurance by Rossi about IP and signed the agreement. How can they say they were not sure Rossi has produced excess of heat?
The Lugano test was not a trustworthy test? Really? When did IH discovery it?
I don't want to explore all topics raised by the parties. I will read the judgment.
I just note that the IH "leitmotiv" about the fact that Rossi machine didn't work is not persuasive...
But, if you think Rossi in a "scam artist" and IH are good samaritans, feel free to think it...
My idea is that experts will be listened by the jury. They will decide the case. And ERV cross examination will play a central role.