Rossi vs. Darden developments [CASE CLOSED]

Kev: You are correct, it was Linus Pauling and Vitamin C. It was Shockley and his views on race, intelligence and

eugenics that I was thinking of. Good thing I made a point of saying earlier I am not a scientist. Oh, and by the way, I don't believe I ever said that Penon had not be deposed.

Law firms: O'Melveny & Myers, Hughes Hubbard & Reed, Loeb & Loeb. If you were thinking of engaging them, bring a large check.

Quote from SSC

Of course I can. Here are two links, from which the following sentences are taken:

https://dibattiti.wordpress.co…gylab-intervista-focardi/

("si era riusciti" : we have been able to)

http://www.radiocittadelcapo.i…usione-fredda-ni-h-75679/

My Italian is no existent. However the page seems to talk about a small apartment and processes and not heating a factory for several years.

Are you sure you have it right?

Quote from [email protected]

Since you like taking up lawyers on their bullshit, you should take up your own bullshit. Only one of your examples was science, and it's not like Shockley conned many people over vitamin C. In fact I would suggest you made yet another mistake there and intended to say Linus Pauling. Way to go, lawyer boy.

By bringing in invalid analogies, especially by your ridiculous political stance, you are attempting to obfuscate. Typical lawyer move. Please, by all means, tell us your former law firm so that we can all go out of our way to avoid it.

Please explain this: "especially by your ridiculous political stance, you are attempting to obfuscate." Are you suggesting that I am attempting to obfuscate my opinions, political or otherwise? I thought I was pretty open open them. Or are you suggesting that being a liberal progressive Democrat is a ridiculous political stance?

Don't forget that one of the small modules was used to climatize the Doral factory, per the "Cat and Ball" Trademark application. (even if those small modules did not function...)

Quote from SSC

Of course I can. Here are two links, from which the following sentences are taken:

https://dibattiti.wordpress.co…gylab-intervista-focardi/

("si era riusciti" : we have been able to)

http://www.radiocittadelcapo.i…usione-fredda-ni-h-75679/

I see where he is heating an office for a few years but not a factory for years and nothng about if that specific heater was actually producing COP>1. I often have to cool my lab due to the instruments and equipment but they are not producing excess.

Quote from [email protected]

That's as simple as the guy trying to point to why isn't Rossi selling zillions of reactors in Europe. If IH had that kind of technology other than Rossi, they would be the hottest company on the horizon. They had COP of 3 to 20 depending on... Rossi. That's why they are striving to keep Rossi's supposedly worthless IP.

I don't believe that. For example if the tech used costly Pd, or quickly wore out (as with G Miley's unit) it would not be commercially viable. You are mixing having a technology to produce excess with commercial viability.

Domestic boiler... USPTO

Quote from [email protected]

Thanks for the reference. When I was a process server I would sometimes bring a check and say it had to be delivered personally. It was a valid check for a nickel, and sometimes the recipients considered their time so valuable that they actually cashed it. I'm thinking OMHHRLL would cash my check, not realizing that their time in doing so is worth far more than that nickel. I'm thinking you would have cashed my check as well.

That more than explains your legal acumen. As to the nickel check, with the ability to deposit it by scanning it with my cell phone, why not.

I haven't been following the slideshow discussion closely, but as a reminder, it is from 2013 as detailed in this old ecw comment

Quote

Other presentations uploaded on the same day (20140925) on that website seem to confirm that the presentations have been done in 2013, probably Oct 13, 2013 (see first slide and bottom of slides)

http://www.chinauspark.com/...

http://www.chinauspark.com/...

Same date mentioned earlier in the comments by Wenzi:

"Atril pdf-viewer shows this File/Properties info for the 20140925152226_9375.pdf file:

Creator: John Vaughn

Microsoft® PowerPoint® 2010

Created/Modified: Sunday 13 October 2013"

Display More

@kevmolenr, this is a warning: If you don't stop the aggressive, contentless replies, your account will be suspended for two weeks.

Two paperless notes now on the docket:

• Clerks Notice to Filer re 317 Proposed Voir Dire Questions. Document Not Related to Case; CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED - Filer must file a Notice of Striking, then refile the document in the appropriate case. (ps1) (Entered: 06/20/2017)
• PAPERLESS Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga: Interim Pretrial Conference held on 6/20/2017. Total time in court: 1 hour(s) : 33 minutes. Attorney Appearance(s): Christopher Rebel Jude Pace, Christopher Martin Lomax, Brian W. Chaiken, Court Reporter: Stephanie McCarn, 305-523-5518 / [email protected]. (cmz) (Entered: 06/20/2017)

I apologize if I have contributed to the downturn in decorum and will hence forth cease poking anyone in the eye or the chest (or other body parts). Also, will restrict posts to substantive points.

anyone know why they are delaying the trial till the 28th?

Quote from THHuxleynew

When were they so happy with Rossi's reactor? A long time before the test. The dummy reactor? That showed that a Rossi test could be 100% wrong. The Swedes however and Penon etc were all saying tests were OK. The Ferrara tests, after that, were pretty convincing. In retrospect (and I at the time) it is easy to see Rossi is a flake. IH bet that he must have something, rather like you KeV they read Mats book (or equivalent) and in spite of reservations felt it was too good a chance to miss.

Genadi, on his thread posted, some nice Russian Rossi repros, that were recently made. Ni LENR seems to work very, very well...

The Ni-H LiAlH4 repros.