More intriguing Boeing deposition testimony. Sadly, I'm seeing the supposed irrefutable Boeing test become uncomfortably transparent.
326, pp. 112-113
Q. Okay.
8 Does this refresh your recollection as to
9 any explanation that had been provided as to why the
10 E‐Cat may not have worked?
11 A. Yes. It is indicating that they may have
12 had a slight difference in the fuel.
13 Q. In fact, I believe in this email dated
14 November 21st, 2014, from Mr. Darden to yourself,
15 Mr. Vaughn, and Mr. Dameron, Mr. Darden states, "I was
16 hopeful, but also worried due to the change I made to
17 the fuel based on the material supply issue."
18 Was it your understanding, sir, that the
19 fuel was not the same as Dr. Rossi's fuel, based on
20 that comment?
21 A. So I ‐‐ yeah. So apparently, based on that
22 comment, I would say that, yes, that is not
23 necessarily exactly the same. So yeah. I ‐‐ I ‐‐ I
24 take the face ‐‐ comment at face value.
25 Q. Okay.
Page 113
Now, did Industrial Heat ever make
2 arrangements to send back another unit properly
3 fueled?
4 MR. BELL: Objection to form.
5 A. They never sent us another unit, no.
6 Q. (By Mr. Annesser) Okay.
7 And let me ask that in a different way just
8 based on the objection.
9 Did Industrial Heat ever offer to either
10 send fuel that had not been changed by Mr. Darden for
11 the E‐Cat?
12 MR. BELL: Objection to ‐‐
13 A. No.