Our friends at Phonon Energy have produced an update on their glowstick clone. Nice pictures too.
Replicating the Replicators.
-
-
I am not familiar with this group, but from the initial review of the posted site, I give a qualified thumbs up!
I believe it almost impossible to foresee or think of every issue in these tests. But if a group reads other experimenter's reports and learns from them, each test will be improved. That is what is needed with LENR. Open and honest reporting!
And I mainly speak about the testing methods. People can keep their "secret" sauce so to speak. They should be rewarded for their hard work, money spent and in some cases, the arrows shot their way. If they want to reveal the formula, so much the better. But once an accurate and replicable testing method is nailed down., especially if affordable, LENR will have a major milestone under it's belt.
Kudos!
I have not heard anything about MFMP lately... any news on that front?
-
MFMP were gonna start a new glowstick experiment, but then they got delayed trying to make something work (was it muon detectors or something similar?).
That was a few weeks ago.
-
That was a few weeks ago.
Did not Mr. Greenyer post about a month ago, that some "fool proof" test was under way and should take a couple of weeks.
If I remember correctly, it was some type of "bio-lenr".What is the status of this?
-
In case anyone didn't know MFMP have a Facebook page and a website (Quantumheat). 'Magicsound' a regular contributor here may be able to give us an update too.
-
-
In reply to Alan Smith's reference to the MFMP videos on Egely ---
This sounds fairly easy/inexpensive to confirm or refute -
Egely has patents applications at USPTO -Renewable energy production process with a device featuring resonant nano-dust plasma, a cavity resonator and an acoustic resonator -- US 20140126679
http://www.google.com/patents/US20140126679Method for the production of renewable heat energy -- US 20140098920
http://www.google.com/patents/US20140098920The nano-dust aspect (somewhat related to the recent claimed hi-temp superconductors) seems perhaps similar to 'The Branly Effect' --
Understanding Branly's effect through Induced Tunnelling
https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.7464
Understanding the Branly effect
https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0703495
Electrical conductivity in granular media and Branly's coherer: A simple experiment
https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0407773
Nonlinear electrical conductivity in a 1D granular medium
https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0311453
Breakdown patterns in Branly's coheror
https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9807012
Branly's effect elucidated
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259444237_Branly's_effect_elucidated
Tikalon Blog
http://tikalon.com/blog/blog.php?article=2014/Branly -
http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/F…seudo-Particles-Part3.pdf
On page 31 near the end of the page Dr György Egely identifies the modern field of science responsible for the dust based LENR reaction as Surface Plasmon Polaritons. Yes, over the years since the time of Tesla there has been many names applied to this reaction but nanoplasmonics has advanced this subject as a field of science.
Here is the entire article by Dr György Egely in three parts:
http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/F…seudo-Particles-Part1.pdf
http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/F…seudo-Particles-Part2.pdf
http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/F…seudo-Particles-Part3.pdf
What properly describes the so called Branly's effect is explained in this articlePlasmonics with a twist: taming optical tornadoes on the nanoscale
Want To Advertise or Sponsor Us?
CLICK HERE to contact us.
CLICK HERE to contact us.