Just for fun: Let's bet, what we can expect from Rossi in February... anyone interested ?

  • I would start with emissivity. That is the main issue.

    The total hemispheric emissivity was conflated normal spectral emissivity, which ultimately causes an error that almost exactly cancels the excess heat reported when corrected.

    There are other minor issues that confound exact solutions, but they can be ignored in the first pass.


    The Lugano authors headlined excess heat and acceleration of excess heat with temperature as the two facts that could not be explained.


    The error above catches the excess heat to within experimental errors. More interestingly (to me) it also catches the acceleration in excess heat exactly (to within 0.5% of heat. That just falls out of the calculations without fudging and is strong validation that there is no exothermic reaction. In spite of this the meme that Rossi-like systems generate exothermic LENR survives, as far as I can see on no solid evidence.


    Pages here document all of this.

  • Ah, now I found it. Really funny, this Rossi stinks to heavens, no doubt anymore. If his fraudulent tendency is worth to place bets on, then we can continue for years. Unfortunately the wins will drop the more and more it is becomming more likely, that the tendency is: Another delay ? What else ....

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Want To Advertise or Sponsor Us?
CLICK HERE to contact us.