Sorry, I apologize for the confusing. I didn’t mean the scientific contents of your post (#91), but the way you responded the critics and started your post with the captivating sentence: “Sorry, this is just an opinion”. That was very well done! Nearly every person in your situation had started a quarrel to defend his ego.
Personally I have no new theory about the LENR mechanism. Because when a phenomenon (LENR mechanism) is conform the existing physics laws and theories, it is no more than a specific situation in physics.
That’s why I have asked you about your interest in LENR experiments. Because when a “mysterious” phenomenon like the LENR mechanism is described with the help of the referential frame of reliable physics you cannot speculate any longer about the origin of the phenomenon (or you have to proof the description is wrong).
In other words: speculation time is over! Ed Storms has described the Pd-lattice process painfully and it showed to be a simple result of the main law in physics, the conservation of energy.
Now there is a new challenge: there is a need for small LENR reactors that can keep the active area undamaged and can resupply hydrogen into the active area.
Well, it sounds interesting, isn't it?!