(not MFMP but) BG preparing some big announcement?

Robert Ellefson, thank you. Not all of the posts in the range 236-245 were obviously related to Papp, and those that were not have been left in this thread. Please identify any that you feel obviously do not belong here if you disagree. There is no need for your post to be deleted, but you can delete it yourself if you wish.

Hans contribution has the exact same amount than Carl Pages. There is a detailed donor list on the MFMP site. Thanks Hans...mine was significantly smaller

This is by far the best shot for open LENR+ replication, validation and exploration. There was no better opportunity in the past and there will not be a better opportunity in the near future. So I think everyone hoping that LENR+ becomes reality should donate, even if it is a small amount.

They estimate 8000$ for the validation and replication of Suhas ECCO reactor and 4000$ for me365s reactor. Tomorrow Suhas wanted to give a detailed cost estimation for the replication of his reactor + fuel preperation machine so the costs may vary. This is two shots at open LENR+ validation for 12000$. They want to test both reactors at the same time to save some travelling costs.

Sidenote: As Zephir pointed out, the ECCO reactor is similar to the newinflow reactor (http://newinflow.ru/pdf/Klimov_Poster.pdf) for which significant transmutation is reported. This could become pretty interesting.

Oh. Once a again such an intelligent comment. Self funded science is self funded - this is stating the obvious.

And a brilliant idea written onto a napkin is worthless unless it is presented with 30 shiny power point slides and a PR departmend approved advertisment in national tv. If you don t have anything to say why do you comment?

"Induce facepalms"! YMMD

If I was a native speaker this would instantly become active vocabulary.

Max said check out ITER

I think their check will bounce soon.

In stark contrast to prodigal #EUscience

is shoestring total disclosure participatory demoscience at

Cheers Bob George Suhas...

NASA observations reshape basic plasma wave physics The wave's ability to trap particles was predicted more than 50 years ago but hadn't been directly captured with such comprehensive measurements until now. The new results also showed a much higher rate of trapping than expected.

This observation could bring a bit more clue into Ken Shoulders’ EVOs, High-Density Charge Clusters and Condensed plasmoids. The intensive microwave radiation not only doesn't scatter charged particles, but it makes them more clustered above certain intensity treshold.

Frequencies are only about 1 Hz in this experiment

They can trap electrons it appears

What do higher frequencies of microwave radiation do?

Full paper at

http://www.nature.com/articles…mmunications+-+current%29

Zephir said "The intensive microwave radiation not only doesn't scatter charged particles, but it makes them more clustered above certain intensity threshold"

Something here in the bottom article might be relevant

"For typical plasma densities, the electron plasma frequency lies in the microwave range"

http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6587/aa626e

I am sure that Bob Grenyer would appreciate these crazy Russian experiments

The microwave oven is the most accessible tool for research of cold fusion in home conditions. Its output power can be reduced to few watts with ballast capacitor and coupled from magnetron into an outside with coaxial cable in similar way, like the signal from Tesla coil source. Conversely the magnetron power can be boosted in orders of magnitude by powering it from pulsed voltage source (HV capacitor) without risking its damage. Its transformer also represents the simplest source of high voltage (2000 - 6000 V), capable of powering the Quark-X reactor.

Today its cheaper to buy a whole microwave oven than the ignitioncoil, which would require grid transformer anyway. And the ignition coil will get destroyed with few watts of power, because it's cooling is very bad (it's filled with asphalt).