BLP update

Quote from Navid

I am open to understanding the chemistry of how you get this high energy light.

Its not classical chemistry. Is a resonance of the full orbit. You quasi blow up the full orbit and due to containment it recombinates. Resonant orbits work like an antenna. We see the same in LENR but with much, much higher energies.

In your place/situation I would ask Mills where all the other "Hydrino" resonances can be found he predicted... And if you are really nasty, then why they are always 1-2% off... and based on di-hydrino's only ..

Quote from Dr Richard

But these chemical reactions are only in the 100 eV range which would never be sufficient to yield the 20-40 MW power range claimed by Mills. By comparison two proton fragmentation to kaons yields around 300 MeV, and any subsequent muon catalysed fusion reactions (from P-u-P/P-u-D/D-u-D etc) or transmutations of larger nuclei would be in the 10-100 MeV range. So if the Suncell is indeed producing Mega Watts of power and energy gains of 200-500, it must be nuclear in origin.

It isn't producing megawatts consistently in it's current form. Would need something specially prepared for that hopeful eventual situation.

Needs more engineering, I suggest using some of the aspects of the SAPHIRE reactor to maintain a stable low temperature plasma for hydrinos to emit muons into to induce further fusion reactions - or collaborate with the SAPHIRE team and Norront Fusion. There is no advantage to anybody having all these disparate groups beavering away on their own projects (secretively) and getting nowhere - whereas an integrated international collaboration exploiting Holmlid's most recent advances, if we could all (BEC & IH too) work together to solve the energy crisis - might actually work for once.

Quote from Dr Richard

Needs more engineering, I suggest using some of the aspects of the SAPHIRE reactor to maintain a stable low temperature plasma for hydrinos to emit muons into to induce further fusion reactions - or collaborate with the SAPHIRE team and Norront Fusion. There is no advantage to anybody having all these disparate groups beavering away on their own projects (secretively) and getting nowhere - whereas an integrated international collaboration exploiting Holmlid's most recent advances, if we could all (BEC & IH too) work together to solve the energy crisis - might actually work for once.

Yea possible. All of the current production is within the theory they promote.

BLP predate..

terrifying..

The ICCF22 hydrino discussion was less scary..

Ruer tried hard to beef it up.. maybe he needed Navid there..

LENR folks:

Come to our Dark Matter Day event October 31st 12:30pm EST (30min) here: youtube.com/watch?v=2SZDK8CNqdk

This is confusing - both Mills & Holmlid proposed UDH/hydrinos as a possible form of undetectable dark matter in the universe - the missing matter required to account for galactic rotation - so how can dark matter be hydrino energy? Or do you mean hydrino energy is a form of dark energy?

Tightly bound hydrogen is dark matter - we did this poster quickly but i can see why its a bit confusing

Not to worry - I suppose since we all know energy and matter are inter- convertible. Since you seem to be very well informed about BLP and Mills work, how far away do you think we are from some practical hydrino-energy device? From a scientific POV both Mills and Holmlids work parallel each other and if both check out at the end of the day could deserve Nobel prizes.

I thought the whole dark matter thing was refuted by the hydrinos sticking to a magnet a year or so ago. Plus chemistry involving hydrinos, and hydrinos in a jar...

I had asked this question in the past to a rather unconvincing answer. How can hydrinos form chemical compounds if the electron is bound tightly to the proton and is unreactive?

christoph Have you looked in the literature or Mills work? He says a hydrino ion with an electron is reactive (2 electrons) H*- and can form compounds.

A message to everyone here, read the primary literature. Some indicated science publication is not needed (see another thread) and then others indicate the publications are all confused despite experimental tests.

This paper talks about that.

https://endofpetroleum.com/wp-…vel-Hydrino-Compounds.png

The compounds like potassium iodo hydrino hydride look different (dark blue I believe). They were tested and proven to exist at independent labs like Chemical firm WR Grace.

I agree with christoph this does seem rather odd - so the hydrino acquires another electron to form chemical bonds with? Even though the proton-electron hydrino has zero net charge? Can the relevant Mills paper be freed from its paywall so we can study this please?

Quote

both Mills & Holmlid proposed UDH/hydrinos as a possible form of undetectable dark matter in the universe

I indeed wish success for Mills & Holmlid - but it turns out, not THAT big success...

FWIW:

"Einstein was right. Again. His general theory of relativity has passed two serious tests from the universe's most extreme conditions in the last few years.

Here, Einstein's theory predicted the observations from M87 with unerring accuracy, and is seemingly the correct description of the nature of space, time, and gravity."

https://www.sciencealert.com/t…in-s-theory-of-relativity

Quote from seven_of_twenty

is seemingly the correct description of the nature of space, time, and gravity."

Einstein wasnot aware of any dark matter/energy.

Einstein sought for decades to unify gravity and electromagnetics...

Perhaps two questions for Navid

1.Can GUTCP unify gravity and electromagnetics?

2. Evidence for this.?

robert bryant I am not an expert on GUTCP and gravity and unification.

Other than Mills work I suggest you read Brett's paper here.

https://medium.com/@brett.holv…-with-a-bang-1da364efcaa3