"industry will come around once BrLP has something that works, regardless of the science"
If it is really such an important innovation that outclasses conventional fission, IMO the US government cannot or will not allow foreign influence or ownership by Investment. It will be a strategic advantage, that cannot be given away!
Well, i have rather in mind the fact that a certain amount of energy centered at a certain frequency can,yes, climb in frequency but that should implie the lose of a certain amount of this initial energy.
As has been pointed out - yes, this effect can go from lower to higher frequencies, under some circumstances. The paper linked (below), in the Rayleigh thread, is an example of IR "pumping" resulting in UV emission.
If it is really such an important innovation that outclasses conventional fission, IMO the US government cannot or will not allow foreign influence or ownership by Investment. It will be a strategic advantage, that cannot be given away!
This is the Rossi conspiracy theory revisited. Forget it.
What is most important to me is that it was only Mills presenting. This is so Rossi. Very sad because I really believed BLP would deliver.
If you want to predict success, then follow the money. No one is spending more than BLP.
If you want to predict success, then follow the money. No one is spending more than BLP.
ITER is...
What is most important to me is that it was only Mills presenting. This is so Rossi. Very sad because I really believed BLP would deliver.
One thing about Rossi and Randy.
THERE the BOSS.
Just like old times.
Well, you should not conclude too quickly with only informations available at your scale, maybe his technology became classified to explain these apparent circumvolutions.
What is most important to me is that it was only Mills presenting. This is so Rossi. Very sad because I really believed BLP would deliver.
Well, you should not conclude too quickly with only informations available at your scale, maybe his technology became classified to explain these apparent circumvolutions.
I have read claims that this has already happened. Long time I don’t visit ECW but one frequent poster there, that seemed to be a staunch defender of BrLP and of Mills hydrino theory, claimed that the military had already developed some powerful lasers using Mills theory. He never actually said it, but his comments, taken as a whole, suggested to me this was one of the reasons why Mills is not really concerned or worried about getting to commercial stage.
.......this was one of the reasons why Mills is not really concerned or worried about getting to commercial stage.
The other is perhaps that his brother works in Wall St.
Well, you should not conclude too quickly with only informations available at your scale, maybe his technology became classified to explain these apparent circumvolutions.
Maybe this "classified" theory is just a completely unsubstantiated conspiracy theory just like previous ones concerning Rossi.
Have I got this right? It produces too MUCH energy? Melts photovoltaics, or requires a river of water boiling away?
More Randy Talk.
Good read Sam. Thanks. The comments section is where the real action is. Good arguments pro/con about Mills there. Lots of references.
Maybe you are right, indeed 
Maybe this "classified" theory is just a completely unsubstantiated conspiracy theory just like previous ones concerning Rossi.
Not sure where to put this but here is paper that should not be too hard that discusses fundamental stuff that realtes to the hydrino theory,
So I reworked it a little more, added a possible argument for what dark matter and dark energy is. The whole idea of assuming there is a limit to the amount of energy density the space can allow assumes that energy is absolute but the base may be different in different parts of the universe and could mean that there is a variation if what the fundamental constants are. But it is not too terrible as there is only 1 or 2 parameters that may change and they may change according to something we can model. Also the astute reader will notice that we know that just changing one of the fundamental constants just a little creates some weird universe, but that's changing 20 different constants individually. Here one or two parameters will result in all 20 changing simultaneously in a constrained fashion and that is into unknown territory.
I tried to make a blog post that is more light in it's content in order to help populize the idea as math tend to turn people off. It should give an overview of the main take away's from what this model or modifications of it can accomplish.
