Somewhat interesting from the report:

"REPORT OF THE EXPERIMENT MADE ON MARCH 7 2017 IN
THE LABORATORY OF THE FACTORY OF LEONARDO CORPORATION
Address of the site: 7861 NW 46th St., Doral, Florida, 33139 USA"

Well, JMP was supposed to be at this address, but now Rossi has officially stated it is Leonardo Corp's "Factory". Another almost bullet proof point that there was no customer for the 1 year test and we now know where Rossi does his experimental work. One would have to believe that JMP moved production into a facility and then vacated it in a very short period of time (1 year) and then Rossi took over the facility. Not likely. I wonder who his "team" is now that Fabiani is in Russia?

Perhpas Mr. Weaver could chime in on what equipment was setup at this location, if he knows of any.

Is it well equipped lab or is it "bare bones bench and voltmeter?"

Mr. Gullstrom seems to be a doctoral student at Uppsalla.

https://katalog.uu.se/empinfo/?id=N9-174

He has been linked with the Lugano testers and Rossi since 2014 per Sifferkol. (Did not think I would ever link to Sifferkol's site! I do not know how accurate it is? I wonder whatever happened to him anyway?)

http://www.sifferkoll.se/siffe…l-oscar-gullstrom-papers/

One thing I must say, Rossi is like the Energizer Bunny.... he keeps on going and going and going. Why he simply does not "really" sell a plant and put into operation if he really has something. He could put this all to rest several different ways.

If this reactor turns out to work -- it requires much verification -- then it changes the whole ball game.

The source of the light, heat, and direct electric production of the Quark becomes obvious: the excess electric current traveling through the reactor is the source of all three! If the results of the paper can be verified, the following is what comes to mind.

- The current ionizes the gas emitting light.

- The current adds kinetic energy to the ions increasing the temperature.

- The current -- from potentially multiple sources including direct thermionic emission from the heated electrode -- raises the amperage flowing through the output wire.

If this reactor can be verified, EVERYTHING ROSSI HAS SAID ABOUT THE QUARK MAKES PERFECT SENSE.

If of course these results are verified by third parties and turn out to be correct.

I'm hopeful that can be done.

Let us start another bet.

This news is only to hide the quarkX presentation, which was already delayed.

I assume, Rossi now will post several headlines referring to this " new effect ", like he did with the old E-Cat, where we suddenly here nothing more.... only QuarkX here and QuarkX there.

The planned presentation of the QuarkX was delayed.

Now the new effect comes into play.

I also assume, that there will ne NOT A SINGLE ATTEMPT to give a public presentation of the QuarkX, it might vanish and this "new effect" will be the reasons, which Rossi will mention, when he will be asked by anyone about QuarkX, its current state and the presentation.

Then, once again, we will read "... working 16 hours a day to analyse and stabilize the ' new affect', dropped all effort for QuarkX, just to have time to study this 'new effect', bla bla bla bla ".


I am betting 1000 lollipops, that this will be the new direction.

Anyone to join ?

PS.:

@ Axil: Do not post nonsense, if You even do not know, what a Van der Graaf test ist".... unbelievable ... simply Dunning Kruger.

Quote from Hermes

No wonder readers are having difficulty understanding this paper! Lots of wild conjecture and little experimental evidence in support.

But let's look at the details. Under the heading "Experiment" they write, "most stable nucleon have a ground state of 0+and all seen receiver nucleons are of this state"!? Evidently they are unaware that even/even nuclei are more stable than their neighbours and ALL have a spin of zero.

⁶He is proposed to be a product. If this is so, why has its intense beta radio-activity not been observed? Why not design experiments to test conjectures and actually look for predicted effects?

The proposal that neutron transfers might explain CMNS is hardly new, but the authors make no reference to the previous work Hagelstein's neutron hopping, Bazhutov's Erzions, and Fisher's Poly-neutrons, Collis' Exotic Neutral Particles. Fisher in particular, identified ⁶⁴Ni as a neutron pair donor. This would neatly side-step the problem of why no radio-active ⁵⁹Ni is observed.

It is all very well proposing that bound protons are somehow transmuting ²⁷Al to stable ²⁸Si. But why don't we see radio-active ²⁸Al from neutron transfers? What about all the other reactor components including the resistor, container etc.? Why are they not transmuted too?

And missing from all the proposed reactions is any role for hydrogen. What then is its role? At least some discussion of the issues might be in order!

Display More

Finally some reasonable thoughts, and not again the "dreaming and hoping" for Rossi to finally change the world forever. In fact, he already did, he shows us all, that, no matter how far the public meaning is allowed to spread, no matter how strict scientific rules are, no matter how far technology is evolved, there is always enough space for professional, scamming charlatans. Cheers.

This could possibly end up as the most important paper in the history of LENR, if verified by other parties.

Especially, because it is especially threatening unscientific or why Do You mean ?

Quote from ultrasure

Deep River Ventures - is not going to be happy to hear this.

New Paper By Rossi and Gullström Reports QuarkX Experiment — Calculated COP >22,000

Yes, I already commented on this. Another "overwhelming" headline, which surely is nothing then pure fraud.