RCS: Why You’re Biased About Being Biased

    • Official Post

    Interesting


    http://www.realclearscience.co…_being_biased_276002.html

    http://nautil.us/blog/-why-youre-biased-about-being-biased


    Quote

    Why You’re Biased About Being Biased


    In a classic experiment in 1953, students spent an hour doing repetitive, monotonous tasks, such as rotating square pegs a quarter turn, again and again. Then the experimenters asked the students to persuade someone else that this mind-numbing experience was in fact interesting. Some students got $1 ($9 today) to tell this fib while others got $20 ($176 today). In a survey at the end of the experiment, those paid only a trivial fee were more likely to describe the boring activity as engaging. They seemed to have persuaded themselves of their own lie.


    • Official Post

    It just goes to show how flexible the concept of 'truth' can be when money is at stake. I have been looking at this myself recently, and how readily believable lies (like the idea that men think about sex every few minutes) become accepted truths, while difficult truths ( you have more chance of being killed crossing the road than winning the UK lottery) are not commonly believed.


    ‘An appealing falsehood flourishes until it becomes the accepted truth, while reality withers on the vine.’ Max Weber

  • One example of biased bias: Study finds gender bias in open-source programming: GitHub is an online programming community that fosters collaboration on open-source software projects. When people identify ways to improve code on a given project, they submit a "pull request." Those pull requests are then approved or denied by "insiders," the programmers who are responsible for overseeing the project. For this study, researchers looked at more than 3 million pull requests from approximately 330,000 GitHub users, of whom about 21,000 were women. The researchers found that 78.7 percent of women's pull requests were accepted, compared to 74.6 percent for men. However, when looking at pull requests by people who were not insiders on the relevant project, the results got more complicated. Programmers who could easily be identified as women based on their names or profile pictures had lower pull request acceptance rates (58 percent) than users who could be identified as men (61 percent). But woman programmers who had gender neutral profiles had higher acceptance rates (70 percent) than any other group, including men with gender neutral profiles (65 percent).


    IMO the results correspond exact the real situation: once you know, that some group avoids some activity, you'll automatically consider, that average member of this group isn't good in it. Whereas in reality the active members must exert increased effort for to overcome this social status and they will become better in it than average. Apparently this attitude has nothing to do with sexism, but with social recognition. Similarly the proponents of alternative science are often considered incompetent crackpots, despite they're often better in critical thinking and literacy than the average rest, who just accepts mainstream science blindly. IMO this attitude of mainstream toward outsiders is analogous to dark matter behavior which massive bodies also expel into outside of their center.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.