It has always been toxic. What did kevmo change? At one time or another, many who ventured there, were at first deemed too radical because they were strangers, but after a time accepted. You yourself were controversial at first, and now one of the regulars. Same goes for Adrian...who we all miss now. Give it a little time, and so will he be accepted...hopefully.
Like I said, get beyond his abrupt style, which many here have, and he is no different from any Rossi defender, or skeptic.
And if you think kevmo is bad (he really is not), just wait. We just unbanned "we_cat_global". Some of the previously banned, vocal Rossi supporters want back, and we are considering them on a case by case basis.
This is fantastic. You're bringing POLITICS into the discussion?
Please, in case someone wants to discuss POLITICS with Kevmo, go and choose from here
https://disqus.com/by/disqus_vbSJFZ4cDj/?
one of the blogs frequented by him.
That ones are better suited for such discussions than LENR-forum.
Well, let's just keep in mind this little gem, shall we? Blast from the past.
I can assure you that my comments on this forum are not moving science in any direction, nor are they intended to, nor could they. As for your comments, they are the usual bizzaro world stuff I have seen for 6 years from people who are so obsessed with LENR that they consider anyone who doesn't share their beliefs to be bad people. It is no wonder that LENR fandom is often described as a religion and a fanatical one at that. Talk about pathological behavior! I do wonder whether outside the LENR temple folks who act the way you do are normal people. I suppose I will never know.
Please, in case someone wants to discuss POLITICS with Kevmo, go and choose from here
https://disqus.com/by/disqus_vbSJFZ4cDj/?
one of the blogs frequented by him.
That ones are better suited for such discussions than LENR-forum.
You're sorta doxing me out of context. What I said was "This is fantastic. You're bringing POLITICS into the discussion? That practically proves that you ain't much of a lawyer, if ever you were one."
Lets move this science-ward in some direction.
What did Rossi show in the presentation that is true, or at least probably true?
Lets move this science-ward in some direction.
What did Rossi show in the presentation that is true, or at least probably true?
That is foamy-true!
As was inspired by F&P in 1996, he says.
Which science-ward do you expect to move?
"Tell me one last thing," said X. "Is this real? Or has this been happening inside my head?"
Y beamed at him, and his voice sounded loud and strong in X's ears even though the bright mist was descending again, obscuring his figure.
"Of course it is happening inside your head, X, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?"
There are 32 posts above this one, removed from the Rossi-SK thread as (variously) off topic, insulting, irrelevant etc. There are some in there that are relatively harmless but included in order to attempt the creation of some kind of continuity . Some other posts which would fit into the 'bad' categories listed above have been left in place, in order to show something of the cat-fight that goes on when perfectly reasonable people are let off the leash.
ETA- now 34.
There are 32 posts above this one, removed from the Rossi-SK thread as (variously) off topic, insulting, irrelevant etc. There are some in there that are relatively harmless but included in order to attempt the creation of some kind of continuity . Some other posts which would fit into the 'bad' categories listed above have been left in place, in order to show something of the cat-fight that goes on when perfectly reasonable people are let off the leash.
ETA- now 34.
When you shunt the response but leave the original insult, it looks like the one side had no response.
What legalisms? Please enlighten all of us. And I notice you didn't answer the questions either.
You'll find my response shunted over to the Clearance Items thread.
When moderators shunt the response but leave the original contention, it looks like the one side had no response.
You were definitely not the only one predicting the possibility of a settlement. IIRC, I not only discussed the possibility but also discussed possible terms, e.g., mutual walk-aways, which were the terms of the settlement. And as to IH being forced to settle, again IIRC, it was Rossi/his attorneys who indicated that they wanted to settle after opening arguments. I suspect that hearing the litany of lies that Rossi had already admitted to may have made them apprehensive about the outcome of a trial.
As to the possibility of evidence being introduced at trial proving that IH was attempting to screw Rossi over by wrongfully sharing the IP, there is absolutely no evidence of that is any of the discovery made public, especially not in Rossi's deposition. IIRC, he admitted that he had no concrete evidence of such behavior (my memory could be wrong on this point, but I am too tired to double check). And despite what you see on TV or in the movies, there is almost no chance of something coming up in the trial that wasn't disclosed in discovery. That is known as trial by ambush, judges don't like it and if you try to hide something in order to surprise the other side at trial, the judge may very well rule it inadmissible. But I am sure you learned that in Evidence or Trial Advocacy or Civil Procedure.
You'll find my response shunted over to the Clearance Items thread.
When moderators shunt the response but leave the original contention, it looks like the one side had no response.
So for all of your whining about people not answering your questions, you completely fail to answer his question as to why you believe the current Rossi widget is real. SO LET ME ASK THE SAME QUESTION: WHY DO YOU BELIEVE THE CURRENT ROSSI WIDGET IS REAL? Or is your answer going to be an excuse again.
You also complain about personal insults but then you do the same by saying that "to be candid, I'm not really all that interested in your answer," which I interpret, at a minimum, as an implied insult to the person's intelligence, reasoning ability and, possibly, integrity. And just to be clear, based on your posts to date (going back some period of time), I have absolutely no doubts about your lack of integrity, and possibly your intelligence and reasoning ability.
You'll find my response shunted over to the Clearance Items thread.
When moderators shunt the response but leave the original contention, it looks like the one side had no response.
True crackpots argue about the venue, the moderation, what they think other forum participants are thinking, motivations, beliefs and so on. They do so vociferously, incoherently, impolitely and at length. They never argue the science or the facts or what actually happened. Rossi attracts them like flies on ... well, you know.
Any resemblance to a current participant is purely coincidental.
You'll find my response shunted over to the Clearance Items thread.
When moderators shunt the response but leave the original contention, it looks like the one side had no response.
KevMo - IH and Rossi entered into a contract for Rossi's IP. IH paid up and Rossi failed to deliver then made his fateful decision as the fraudster to sue for fraud. The "reports" were all either fraudulent or directly tainted by Rossi. I have further proof of that if anyone wants to legally tango. The truth that came out in discovery has doomed his business prospects into perpetuity. You didn't read anything that holds up your lie that IP was transferred to others because it doesn't exist. You are not able to point to a document that supports your false claim. Further, Rossi proposed a settlement just as the trial was starting - there is no other fact available to you on that subject.
KevMo - yet another tiresome instantiation bomber troll from Planet Rossi who cannot interpret reality / facts (intentionally in my opinion).
You'll find my response shunted over to the Clearance Items thread.
When moderators shunt the response but leave the original contention, it looks like the one side had no response.
@kevmolenr: Now that we are clued in that you are a delicate soul who gets very upset over bits of sarcasm and takes them as horrible insults, we will try to stay clear of your tender toes (yes, that is more sarcasm and probably will set you off again crying “unfair!” to the mods.
So let’s try to understand where you are coming from. Based on the notion that it is not strictly speaking impossible that Rossi’s assorted claims are real, you are saying that pointing out how absurd and unlikely they are is bad form? You like it better if people just regurgitate the nonsense he spews? ECW is designed for that purpose. Why not spend all your time there among like-minded souls? I guess it is because you see yourself as an heroic defender of LENR battling skeptopaths like Jed Rothwell (😅😅😅).
You'll find my response shunted over to the Clearance Items thread.
When moderators shunt the response but leave the original contention, it looks like the one side had no response.
Continuity is difficult to achieve, and your last posts make that even more difficult. so they are also being moved.
Continuity is difficult to achieve, and your last posts make that even more difficult. so they are also being moved.
My last round of posts address the lack of continuity. What you've got is dangling participles.
The skeptopaths post their bullshit, I answered it, and you moved my answers over here but not the original contention. Multiple times. Multiple threads dangling. You left those threads all dangling only pointed in one direction.
Oy vey. I unleashed a monster. This thread is a free for all zone...up to a point. So how about we eliminate outright cursing like the F bomb for sure, and anything that ends, with "hole", starts with an "sh", or for that matter, anything the over active, sinister side of your brain, can think of?
Kevmo IMO, has introduced some sorely needed defense to the pro-Rossi side of this discussion. He says some good things, yet it is being lost in the verbiage.
It would appear that your fellow moderator disagrees with you and seagulled all over that work you put in.
Appearances can be deceptive.
