The guy is not responsible for the crap he posted?
At least one of seven_of_twenty must be
The guy is not responsible for the crap he posted?
At least one of seven_of_twenty must be
I thought all discussion of the person that shall not be named and his theories that shall not be named are banned from this forum due to a legal threat.
What has changed?
The likely path for BLP? Same as always. Specious claims. Always changing. Nothing verified or replicated. Nothing sold. No performance. Lots of current into a small space = lots of fireworks, molten metal, sparks, bright flashes of light. Whooohoo. Short circuits in high power situations are fun!
If you can't make a constructive comment instead of automatically attacking BLP then please get off this thread. You're not welcome here.
I always hated this guy.
He was constantly insulting all of the "anti-Rossis" by calling them "babblers".
Yeah, but, totally right, what he (and I include Mats as well) really did not deserve, was this "presentation".
Rossi's self destruction. Or Ross's "comming out" or whichever word You find suitable... but this was definitely Rossi spitting in the face of all his supporters. Final chapter almost closed.
Your 'hatred' doesn't matter now. Let it rest. Alan
So no one has a single comment?
This forum is slowing down.
I am really interested in the use of 199Hg in systems like BLPs.
QuoteIf you can't make a constructive comment instead of automatically attacking BLP then please get off this thread. You're not welcome here.
Seriously? You have some sort of proprietary and control interest in this thread? Only positive comments that agree with you are deemed acceptable? Noting how absurd Mills' claims are and how long he has gotten funding without accomplishing anything other than bright flashes stimulated by huge currents is constructive.
Noting how absurd Mills' claims are and how long he has gotten funding without accomplishing anything other than bright flashes stimulated by huge currents is constructive.
This is an over SOT -ed comment. Mills found a working process to produce condensed H*. He just repeated the work of Santilli and is not the inventor of the basic principle. His latest publication is a proof that he has H*H* pairs and the look similar to Hydrinos...
But Mills is not an engineer and his mathematical model for hydrinos looks like fringe, but there are some lucky close matches with better models for H*-H* pairs.
You can - at most - only punish him for bad management of an interesting project.
Could you please tell me what a H*-H* pair is?
QuoteYou can - at most - only punish him for bad management of an interesting project.
Sure. For thirty years and counting. Enough time for most of modern technology to develop.
QuoteMills found a working process to produce condensed H*.
No. He claims to have. It's an important distinction as folks should have learned from Andrea Rossi. As for Santilli, see this link originally provided by Alan Smith : http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/201…-sees-invisible-entities/
See also this thread in which JedRothwell describes Santilli as a "lunatic." I know nothing about Santilli but I have been following Mills and his company for more than 10 years and I have a strong opinion from what I have seen so far. It's nothing but claims and very similar to the early Rossi. It doesn't take a genius to make metal flash brightly with 1000 amps.
Could you please tell me what a H*-H* pair is?
The first step of LENR is "dense hydrogen" with flux on SO(4) orbits. H* initially (Santilli) has been called toroidal Hydrogen what is in agreement with the SO(4) model.
See also this thread in which JedRothwelldescribes Santilli as a "lunatic."
He strikes me as a lunatic. Personally, that is. I cannot judge his scientific claims.
There have been gifted scientists who were lunatics. The Birdman of Alcatraz is a famous example. Tesla was unbalanced, in my opinion. Newton was a jerk, but he was the greatest scientist who ever lived.
Display MoreThis is a half truth.
Which upcoming paper?
there are two
1. Excess heat
2, Increased heat
the most recent being
Increased heat
Is there any reason to replicate R19 over R20?
R20 gave a 400% increase in measurable delta T for the a
ctive reactor versus the calibration reactor
What did R19 give? 500%??? 50%
And THH says replicate R19??? because Mizuno wrote about it in a paper.
THHNew has a bad habit of writing half truths
Babble on.
That's all I have to say!
Get a real life, RB!
So does Bang99 have a technical comment
Is it richtig to model heat transfer by radiation only when convection is more predominant?
I have objected to your latest ad hominem statement
If you want to start another topic
called defend THHnew please do
there are multiple other anonymous persona ... perhaps paid trolls perhaps unpaid trolls who will
By the way, did anybody else receive private messages from a "monica" something ?
Yes- ignore is my advice- I suspect this is an email collection thing...
Yeah, was just curious, whether I am the only "lucky guy" in here
THX
me too.
I'm never the lucky guy, so it's a scam.