For sure.
I would think this is likely to be a language translation issue and what is meant is "falls 80 F". If not, wow.
I say a roughly 10% drop is wow any way you slice it.
For sure.
I would think this is likely to be a language translation issue and what is meant is "falls 80 F". If not, wow.
I say a roughly 10% drop is wow any way you slice it.
... "is full of little gems" ...
Not the "Coronium" concept anyway.
... "is full of little gems" ...
Not the "Coronium" concept anyway.
Coronium = Hydrinos ? :
"The time has come to recognize that the assumption of M. Fleishman and S. Pons in [1] about the nuclear nature of processes in devices claiming to be superunit thermal characteristics sent the researchers in the wrong direction. Nuclear processes in these devices come with increased intensity compared to the background, but apparently are related processes. And the main reason for the increased heat generation lies in non-nuclear mechanisms.
One of the possible mechanisms for explaining the increased heat release was the proposal in [3] by A.O. Barut in 1976 13 years before [1] and, apparently independently, by J.R. Vigier in [4] in 1993. The main result of [3,4] is to modify the interaction potential of the proton-electron system and obtain the main solution with an interaction radius smaller than the Bohr orbit. When an electron transfers to these lowered orbits, additional energy will be released. The idea with lowered orbits, but with a different mathematical apparatus for explaining the appearance of such solutions, is used in the theory of the so-called “hydrino” "
Coronium = Hydrinos ? :
"The time has come to recognize that the assumption of M. Fleishman and S. Pons in [1] about the nuclear nature of processes in devices claiming to be superunit thermal characteristics sent the researchers in the wrong direction. Nuclear processes in these devices come with increased intensity compared to the background, but apparently are related processes. And the main reason for the increased heat generation lies in non-nuclear mechanisms.
One of the possible mechanisms for explaining the increased heat release was the proposal in [3] by A.O. Barut in 1976 13 years before [1] and, apparently independently, by J.R. Vigier in [4] in 1993. The main result of [3,4] is to modify the interaction potential of the proton-electron system and obtain the main solution with an interaction radius smaller than the Bohr orbit. When an electron transfers to these lowered orbits, additional energy will be released. The idea with lowered orbits, but with a different mathematical apparatus for explaining the appearance of such solutions, is used in the theory of the so-called “hydrino” "
The idea of the lowered energy orbitals was also proposed by Ruggero Santilli with his magnehydrogen, I would not know when he developped them in full but the first publications of Santilli regarding magnehydrogen were in the late 1990's. I had no idea of these previus works.
"Coronium = Hydrinos?"
"Zitterbewegung", "tresinos" and "quatrinos" at old White House [pag. 19 and 22].
"Coronium = Hydrinos?"
"Zitterbewegung", "tresinos" and "quatrinos" at old White House [pag. 19 and 22].
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1508.06322.pdf
"Zitterbewegung, as it was originally described by Schroedinger, is an unphysical, non-observable effect."
And while we are talking of tightly bound states of hydrogen aka Hydrino, this author gave them a try and discarded them as “unphysical”
https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0608095.pdf
However, this is just played at the paper level, I wonder how they decide something is calculable in paper but unrealistic. How do you define what is reality or fiction if you are fiddling with equations and finding solutions?
"Zitterbewegung, as it was originally described by Schroedinger, is an unphysical, non-observable effect."
And while we are talking of tightly bound states of hydrogen aka Hydrino, this author gave them a try and discarded them as “unphysical”
Reading dense matter physics papers based on Dirac equations are fringe science - just a waste of time.
Such simple models as the Dirac equation just work for kinetic experiments in the potential only interaction limits. Dense matter starts at 4 rotations flux interaction and it includes a magneto static solution.
Zitterbewegung is an old fashioned term. The simplest orbits to describe it is a torus surface with a 2 rotation trajectory (= polarized photon) where the magnetic flux is rotating orthogonal to the photons trajectory, what looks like Zitterbewegung.
Just one more reminder: SM = QED/QFT/QCD/LQCD does not deal with internals of dense matter. All these models just describe the collision behavior of particles. It is outraging that people still believe that a model (SM) that is not able to give any relation between particle masses etc. should explain fusion etc. what is a change in particle masses...
"Dense matter starts at 4 rotations flux interaction and it includes a magneto static solution."
Does this mean that your model needs "only" the existence of an "hypothetical" fourth dimension ?
Does this mean that your model needs also the existence of a an "hypothetical" magnetic monopole ?
Walter Pegeto. - be nicer, or your model might find itself in the street.
I tried to transcribe Zatelepin's Sochi presentation video as comments to the slides https://drive.google.com/file/…7WXHkrh/view?usp=drivesdk
Does this mean that your model needs "only" the existence of an "hypothetical" fourth dimension ?
String theory starts at 11 dimensions. SM owns crippled 8 dimensions....
What is your problem?
There is no magnetic monopole...as all magnetic field lines are closed.
I tried to transcribe Zatelepin's Sochi presentation video as comments to the slides https://drive.google.com/file/…7WXHkrh/view?usp=drivesdk
an english version???
So the energy is coming from EM forces in a predominately a-nuclear environment? really trying to understand. In the comments there is englih translation.
String theory starts at 11 dimensions. SM owns crippled 8 dimensions....
If exists a fourth dimension, is it possible to escape or enter in a closed environment (as in science fiction stories) ?
Is the distance between two points in this 4d space euclidean (d=sqrt(x2+y2+z2+w2)) ?
How do you define the simple concept of speed ? Is c the maximum speed only in the old 3 dim universe ?
I'm lost...
Walter Pegeto = you can only define velocity if you can define time. Who knows what governs time in the sub-atomic world?
Walter Pegeto = you can only define velocity if you can define time. Who knows what governs time in the sub-atomic world?
Do you mean that in the "picturesque" Wyttenbach's sub-atomic world, time is replaced by a fourth spacial dimension ?
This is even more difficult to imagine! AFAIK, not even in science-fiction literature there are time-less "beings"
T here are many things that are stranger than fiction Maybe you should send out for some of them? Meanwhile I have a question for you. Do you think LENR is possible?