Clearance Items

  • Speaking of horror shows: https://www.foxnews.com/politi…-positive-for-coronavirus


    Quote

    “We were recently notified by the White House Medical Unit that a member of the United States Military, who works on the White House campus, has tested positive for Coronavirus,” Trump aide Hogan Gidley said in a statement Thursday.


    Typical Fox underplay of news. This is a White house valet (!) --someone who personally brought and served Trump food among other things. No masks are worn by anyone within the West Wing of the White House where the president hangs out most of the time (watching TV and eating Big Mac's and Kentucky Fried Chicken). As we speak, the President could be incubating COVID-19. Among other things he incubates.


    ETA: Oh... I didn't know he had a good reason: a mask makes him look ridiculous is what he says is his reason for never wearing one. And it would send "the wrong message."Oh... OK then. Whaaaaat?

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politi…nd-wrong-message-n1202001

  • One of the recent contributors who has no qualifications, except negative ones, to contribute anything to a discussion of COVID-19 prevention and treatment, reminded me of the old story about the streetwalker who had a treatable STD and refused to take the prescribed drugs. She was, of course, arrested. The charge was "practicing license without a medicine."

  • Lord Corporation used our Ultraconductors to protect aircraft from lightning strikes. They have half the weight of previous coatings.

    We proved these room temperature superconductors can substantially improve thermoelectric devices on one of four SBIR contracts completed successfully including a Phase II with the USAF which tested the materials. They can still emerge as important products along with a few other little known RTSC.

    Magnetic generators are likely to emerge in practical products during the next year or so.

    Joseph Romm, former head of Renewable Energy at DOE once stated it typically takes 20 to 30 years for new science to yield practical products. When they disagree with textbook dogma that period grows much longer as LENR amply demonstrates.

    • Official Post

    Lord Corporation used our Ultraconductors to protect aircraft from lightning strikes. They have half the weight of previous coatings.

    We proved these room temperature superconductors can substantially improve thermoelectric devices on one of four SBIR contracts completed successfully including a Phase II with the USAF which tested the materials. They can still emerge as important products along with a few other little known RTSC.

    Magnetic generators are likely to emerge in practical products during the next year or so.

    Joseph Romm, former head of Renewable Energy at DOE once stated it typically takes 20 to 30 years for new science to yield practical products. When they disagree with textbook dogma that period grows much longer as LENR amply demonstrates.


    Probably best for you to stick to VitC treatments for COVID, and water fuels. We have a reputation to protect. Members know about your website, and can go there if they want to read the other stuff.

  • Quote

    Probably best for you to stick to VitC treatments for COVID, and water fuels. We have a reputation to protect. Members know about your website, and can go there if they want to read the other stuff

    Interestingly, I was curious and glanced at Mark Goldes' Facebook. I was amazed to find a very useful Youtube video link which describes very accurately how to sanitize groceries! I suggest that Mr. Goldes should post that on the COVID-19 thread where it would be welcome... but in case he went away, I posted it here, with genuine thanks to Mark Goldes who for once, provided something useful and real! I never cease to be amazed. I will skip the broken watch metaphor.


    This physician is clear and complete and solved one of my problems-- how to safely store frozen foods when the virus is not harmed, in fact is preserved by freezers.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?…ontinue=811&v=sjDuwc9KBps

  • According to Frank Acland - owner of ECW -at the time, the de-list was a mistake, and soon rectified. He called an engineer he knows at Google it seems. Even I know an engineer at Google.


    What happened was detailed by Vorhies. I can see why the engineer and Frank thought that, but it's not the whole story. A site with similar search url as ecatworld was created, that did trigger the fake news detector and in essence was used to take down ecatworld. Zach describes this well.


    Forest from trees. They control information in terms of algorithms test data sets, human entered blacklists, and "thought leadership promotion." (e.g. right now that is the WHO).


    Go type in hydroxychloroquine in google search. Go type Randell Mills into google search. A ton of old information and debunked crap comes up despite MASSIVE volume of information that is far better and more recent.


    The corpus of data is clear that on certain topics the 'fake news' and policy driven framework is blocking free speach. We are now delisting scientists like Dr. Minkovits because she challenges Fauci head on and is one of the few people on the planet who can do that.





  • What I love about the "deep state conspiracy theory whistleblower" videos is how sinister they look. Shadowy figures shown only in sillhouette with no provenance.


    "Cock-ups, not conspiracies, stupid"


    In March, 19 years later, the first university published paper about 911. Real scholarship showing Building 7 could not have fallen from fire. http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7

    So, are they now conspiracy theorists? Give me your honest assessment. I'm ok with "yes until a government commission says otherwise this is a conspiracy theory."


    What if most of the conspiracy name-calling and the entire concept is used to socially police open inquiry? Is that possible?

  • In March, 19 years later, the first university published paper about 911. Real scholarship showing Building 7 could not have fallen from fire. http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7

    So, are they now conspiracy theorists? Give me your honest assessment. I'm ok with "yes until a government commission says otherwise this is a conspiracy theory."


    What if most of the conspiracy name-calling and the entire concept is used to socially police open inquiry? Is that possible?

    "conspiracy theories" ?!


    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    https://d.tube/#!/v/overlogg33…BMsp17ZNRQXPxXUCkUbhPALjh

  • "conspiracy theories" ?!


    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    https://d.tube/#!/v/overlogg33…BMsp17ZNRQXPxXUCkUbhPALjh


    Real scholarship is not paid for and unpublished  reports from low profile individuals with funding from shady fringe advocacy groups https://www.ae911truth.org/ known to post misleading and untrue information.


    Fact / bias check on that site:


    https://mediabiasfactcheck.com…engineers-for-9-11-truth/


    QED


  • 8 minutes after I posted that you decided this report was untrue, from low-profile individuals (ad-hominem attack), and should be discredited. As for who paid for it, Are you here to learn and share genuinely? Doesn't appear so. There are 3000 architects and engineers who signed the petition to support that organization: https://www.ae911truth.org/sig…tition-3000-AEs-18-10.pdf


    People who stir up fear, uncertainty, doubt never actually address someone's questions head on. They dance from one subject to another to stir the pot.

    Perhaps you are paid to do this. I know for sure in 8 minutes you did not read that report and tried to discredit it immediately. I concur with Wyttenbach. You may be a threat to this community, because if this goes on good people will leave. That happens in many online communities, and many times the people are paid I am sorry to say.

  • THHuxley

    https://mediabiasfactcheck.com…engineers-for-9-11-truth/


    interesting. These are arguments are sufficient to close any debate unless you are a die hard tin hat woo-woo!


    "Unfortunately, their claims are not supported by the official 9/11 Commission Report that outlined how the buildings fell. While the arguments made are compelling, they simply are not the consensus among researchers. Therefore, their position is considered a conspiracy theory until proven otherwise."


    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.