Clearance Items

Quote from oldguy

So are you asserting that once Rossi's blog is mentioned in court, all information in it becomes evidence? All those things like his claims that the heat was from endothermic chemistry,,, no wait, vented out the roof,.... no wait out a window..... Rossi's claims of sales of 4 ecat (which would be a violation of contract), his claims of robots making ecats, his even admitting to IH trial testing which is a violation of confidentiality,.... and so on?

Yup. All of it. Such a thing should make the anti-Rossi folks happy but they are a bit slow on the uptake.

Moved from the Rossi v. Darden thread. Eric

kirkshanahan wrote: BTW (by the way), what’s tldr? (You should stop using undefined acronyms…)

***Hah hah, touche'. tldr is too long, didn't read. It's how you win an argument on the internet by generating so much bloviating that the other side stops reading it. You're pretty close to winning.

Moved from the P&F replication thread. Eric

zeus

The one exception being when they are thrust in my face. But generally, I have no interest in low power systems. Measurement error potential is way too large.

But while I generally don't comment on specific Pd-D experiments, I still reserve the option to comment on the experimenters based on such things as their sky-high promises and dirt-low production over years if not decades.

Quote from kirkshanahan

The critic points out possible mistakes. The researchers evaluate them and respond appropriately.

***And the researchers have responded appropriately. Best of luck to you.

Moved from the P&F replication thread. Eric

Quote from Eric Walker

@kevmolenr:

The moderators are Alan, Rends, Curbina and myself. Anyone with a name in yellow. Do not troll this place. If your intention is to wage battle with evildoers, do that elsewhere. This is a forum for polite, informed discussion. You will be banned if you revert to your earlier behavior, without a second thought on my part.

The reason I don't have "Moderator" under my name is that I asked for it to be changed when I was invited to become a mod. I like to discuss and debate things with informed participants, and I didn't want to put up a barrier to that.

If someone insults me, it seems like insults are allowed. By keying up on only one side (especially the side that didn't START the personal insults) your bias is revealed.

BTW, I only stumbled on this thread out of curiosity. None of the items here got flagged as notifications. You're already at the point of threatening to ban me and it was just a matter of luck that I found out.

Quote from Eric Walker

@kevmolenr, please adopt a politer tone.

I only came across this warning because I was looking through other threads and didn't know what clearance items are. Now apparently I'm on probation. I'll keep that in mind.

What you call a skeptopath is simply anyone who doesn't stomach bullshit well. When it's YOUR favorite brand of BS.

Moved from the Rossi v. Darden thread. Eric

Quote from interested observer

Boy, given that LENR has been amply proven and replicated by world-class scientists again and again,

Where? The ultraskeptical crowd doesn't accept that the F&P AHE has EVER been replicated, even though there's 153 peer reviewed replications listed by Jed/Britz.

How many times has the Pons-Fleischmann Anomalous Heating Event been replicated in peer reviewed journals?

Quote from [email protected]

***And the researchers have responded appropriately. Best of luck to you.

Moved from the P&F replication thread. Eric

Jed calls Shanahan a crackpot and the remark stays on the thread. I say that the researchers responded appropriately, wish him luck and the comment gets put over here. Some farm animals are more equal than others.