Clearance Items

  • Quote

    Everything allowed on Rossi should be allowed on anyone else as well. Is that too much to ask?


    Yes. Most everything said about Rossi is the truth. That is an absolute defense. Not so about others. I can only wish I made money from the advice I have given about Defkalion and Rossi. Even though I helped save Dick Smith from a million dollar loss with Defkalion, I did it gratis... pro boner .. uh... bono ...

  • Quote

    But it has no meaning to discuss it deeply here, because the forum is flooded with bored twaddlers without links and qualification, who are only interested/engaged in frog&mice battles with patoskeptics. One person like mary yugo is thus capable to decrease the level of the forum a lot due to secondary effect of many his 2nd grade followers and their 3rd grade sock-puppets. Soon or later every discussion will get burrowed with off-topic clueless posts in this way.


    Spoken like a true believer. Reminds me of when I was participating in life after death and psychic talk-to-the-dead expensive quackery forums. A statement like the above quote only testifies to your gross and consistent inability to address the arguments on their merits.

  • Yes. Most everything said about Rossi is the truth. That is an absolute defense. Not so about others. I can only wish I made money from the advice I have given about Defkalion and Rossi. Even though I helped save Dick Smith from a million dollar loss with Defkalion, I did it gratis... pro boner .. uh... bono ...



    När man talar om trollen ... (as we say in swedish).


    I guess if it was the truth it would be fine, but it isn't. You're only making things up because you are driven by emotions/hatred (you said so) and have contracted some rare kind of obsessive disorder when it comes to names starting with R and ending with ossi ... Obviously your condition is affecting your rational judgement. That's the Truth you're looking for ... And, it's gratis...

  • In case the admins are considering readmitting Roger Barker, he is still pestering poor Georgina who maintains Peter Gluck's blog with stuff like this below. She sent it to me to authenticate but suspected it was Roger Barker. I can't prove it but it certainly seems classical Roger Barker.



    Now some of you criticized my calling this individual a low life. Do you still do? I have to add coward to the list. Peter Gluck is disabled and can not respond to shit like this or defend against it. When Roger takes me on, it's amusing at best and mildly annoying and time wasting at most. But when he harasses an extremely kind gentleman who is disabled, what would you call this individual?

  • All of that is self-taught (and probably erroneous), learned from reading textbooks I purchased on Amazon in 2012 and after when I first started taking an interest in LENR experimental writeups and in skeptical criticisms of LENR.


    I am now amazed if you learned physics without formal education after reading you all these years. Well hats off to you sir. Really I mean it. I got to quit sniffing paint damn.

  • Quote

    there's not a whole lot we can do in this case. I suggest you write Peter Gluck privately and let him know, and/or add a note to the blog to clarify the matter for others. I recall something like this happening to Abd Mats Lewan as well.

    Georgina Popescu is monitoring the blog as best she can but she is not a technical person. She asked me about that post and I explained that it was not mine and that, in fact, by prior agreement with Peter, I had abstained from any posts on the blog for more than a year.


    I didn't expect anyone from here to do anything about it except maybe to make Roger's ban from here (by any pseudonym-- his style is easily recognizable) permanent. On top of everything else he is, he is a coward who attacks the property of a kindly elderly gentleman who is incapacitated and can not defend himself. Some guts that takes!

  • Alan Smith   Eric Walker   maryyugo


    Hi all!


    The Real Roger Barker here. Not sure what is going on. I went to Peter Gluck's blog and I cannot find any of the posts Mary is talking about.


    Admins, please be advised there are people impersonating me and I am a victim of this fraud. The Real Roger Barker does not read or post on Peter's blog. I am however saddened to hear about his condition and wish him well.


    By the way, I have much to discuss so stay tuned. I shall never shy from the hard questions. These must be asked. If this means a permanent ban so be it but freedom and truth will always prevail!


    Much love and peace to all.


  • Georgina Popescu is monitoring the blog as best she can but she is not a technical person. She asked me about that post and I explained that it was not mine and that, in fact, by prior agreement with Peter, I had abstained from any posts on the blog for more than a year.


    I didn't expect anyone from here to do anything about it except maybe to make Roger's ban from here (by any pseudonym-- his style is easily recognizable) permanent. On top of everything else he is, he is a coward who attacks the property of a kindly elderly gentleman who is incapacitated and can not defend himself. Some guts that takes!


    Mary, I have not attacked Peter in anyway. I do not know what you're talking about.

  • In case the admins are considering readmitting Roger Barker, he is still pestering poor Georgina who maintains Peter Gluck's blog with stuff like this below. She sent it to me to authenticate but suspected it was Roger Barker. I can't prove it but it certainly seems classical Roger Barker.



    Now some of you criticized my calling this individual a low life. Do you still do? I have to add coward to the list. Peter Gluck is disabled and can not respond to shit like this or defend against it. When Roger takes me on, it's amusing at best and mildly annoying and time wasting at most. But when he harasses an extremely kind gentleman who is disabled, what would you call this individual?


    Steady on Mary! You posted something about calorimetry and you attribute that to me insulting Peter?! This is really confusing! How does that work?


    Alan Smith I do not know why Mary is accusing me of harassing Peter. This is not making any sense.

  • Meanwhile, I am still being impersonated on Peter Gluck's blog. I did not write these... I do not write to Peter's Blog. Want to bet which low life sewer-dwelling Roger Barker asswipe did it? Of course, it's not traceable but who else has a history of this sort of cowardly slime behavior?


    deleteme.jpg


    Alan Smith So this is type of forum you run Alan? Where people can just abuse others and get away with it?


    Please don't get me wrong, I'm all for a bit of hot stuff, a bit of dirty talk ... gets me going. I just feel there is a bit more venom in Mary's words here ...

  • The Real Roger Barker : you won't last long if your intention is just to troll this place.


    Please Eric, tell me what have I said that is out of order? maryyugo has made accusations against me. Heshe has called me names and sworn at me. I have merely defended myself.


    Have I ever said a bad word against Mary or anyone else on this forum? Never. Go through all my posts and find me just one instance where I've said one bad word against any poster here and I will leave this forum for good. However if you fail to find any post then you, and other admins, leave me be to continue asking the hard questions.

  • Please Eric, tell me what have I said that is out of order? maryyugohas made accusations against me. Heshe has called me names and sworn at me. I have merely defended myself.


    You wrote:


    Admins, please be advised there are people impersonating me and I am a victim of this fraud. The Real Roger Barker does not read or post on Peter's blog. I am however saddened to hear about his condition and wish him well.


    The issue, as you hopefully know, is not that you are being impersonated on Peter's blog. It is that Mary is being impersonated on Peter's blog. I have no idea whether it is you that is doing the impersonating, as Mary alleges. I would not be surprised in the slightest. Regardless, please don't waste our time with this kind of runaround.

  • You wrote:



    The issue, as you hopefully know, is not that you are being impersonated on Peter's blog. It is that Mary is being impersonated on Peter's blog. I have no idea whether it is you that is doing the impersonating, as Mary alleges. I would not be surprised in the slightest. Regardless, please don't waste our time with this kind of runaround.


    This is getting even more confusing. :-( What does someone impersonating maryyugo have anything to do with me harassing Peter? Why is this justification for being called names and being sworn at by Mary?

  • You wrote:


    have anything to do with me harassing Peter?


    You now talk about accusations of your harassing Peter when I explicitly quoted you claiming that you were being impersonated. Quoting again, you said:


    Admins, please be advised there are people impersonating me and I am a victim of this fraud


    Please point to where you were impersonated as claimed, or your account will be suspended.

  • I'm talking about maryyugo writing this "But when he harasses an extremely kind gentleman who is disabled, what would you call this individual?" I have never harassed Peter. Never.


    Mary then followed up by abusing me with nasty words and I've asked Admins why this behavior is acceptable.


    I have been impersonated a number of times on other forums e.g. ECN, though I do not believe I have been on this site. ECN, unfortunately for all of us, has been shutdown so I cannot provide evidence. However given there is history of impersonation there is reason for me to be concerned hence why I posted that.

  • Quote

    Roger Barker:
    Please don't get me wrong, I'm all for a bit of hot stuff, a bit of dirty talk ... gets me going.


    You can easily recognize Roger Barker's posts because he can not resist including in some of them a variety of bizarre sexual innuendos. If you're not looking for these, they are subtle but if you have followed his posts, especially those at ECN, they are obvious and obnoxiously inappropriate. Nobody else whose posts I have seen does that. So his impersonations are easy for the most part to recognize. He seems to be afflicted with some sort of masturbation fetish.


    Georgina, at my urging, has deleted all the offending posts and has placed Peter Gluck's blog on complete moderation.

  • Below is a typical impersonation post by Roger Barker on Peter Gluck's blog. It has since been deleted by Georgina. I can not prove beyond a doubt that it was written by the individual who uses that name but read it and judge the probability on your own. Georgina, not being a technological person, had no way to evaluate this post but she was astute enough to write me about it. After I pointed out the innuendos, she characterized it as "masked porn." I have not heard this term before but it seems to apply. Once more, I am not concerned about stuff like that appearing here (or anywhere I frequent). I do have serious concerns about someone placing on the blog of a sick individual who has to have his friends monitor his blog, a blog which I do NOT regularly read and which I NEVER post to-- probably why "Roger Barker," a coward among his other lowly attributes, chose to impersonate me there.


    Here is his post now deleted (sorry if this is a duplicate-- I think I may have already posted it but I don't recall where):


  • We do not aim to promote LENR willy-nilly. We aim to further understanding of the science behind the research of LENR. That requires detachment from goals such as promotion. It requires taking a hard look at things and being as objective as possible. It requires a diversity of opinion. Thankfully we are starting to have a broad spectrum of people willing to make a reasoned and systematic argument for whatever they think to be true.

    On my thread trying to get to the bottom of how many replications there are for LENR, the polite and reasoned people who acknowledge that there's 153 peer reviewed replications, more than 180 labs, 14,700 instances of replication well those people are being shouted down by the folks you like to call polite and reasoned.

    Eric,

    Good grief! I was attracted to this site by its name, looking for news and technical discussions of the subject. There is very little of either.


    The so called open minded skeptics can't be bothered to read the replication papers that end reasonable doubt about the F & P effect of excess heat being real. So of course they are still undecided. Not that that stops them writing pages of factless waffle.


    Rossi is a different story. I didn't post for years as the unsupported opinions about him were uninteresting. I started posting because the endless, repetitive, libelous insults became annoying. Some you supported and I find your argument that it is OK to do this to a non member entirely wrong. It adds nothing useful to the debate for members or non members to be insulted in that way..


    Obviously nothing I write will have any effect on you but I suggest you change the name of the forum and pick up the discontinued "shutrossidown.com." That way people like me interested in the subject could avoid wasting time looking here.

    To save you setting up straw men, Rossi is an entrepreneur and doesn't publish scientific papers describing what he has done. So it won't be proven in a scientific sense until (if ever) a commercial reactor is offered for sale. From the clues he provides it should still be possible to have a sensible discussion but that does not happen here..