Clearance Items

  • I will write this here directly so nobody has to move it.


    Fabio and Levi (if the guy in the red sweater is Levi) appear to have gained a great deal of weight-- an immense amount in fact. I wonder if it's stress related. No particular point. Just saying. Facing cross examination on ecat stuff could not have been easy!

  • I will write this here directly so nobody has to move it.


    Fabio and Levi (if the guy in the red sweater is Levi) appear to have gained a great deal of weight-- an immense amount in fact. I wonder if it's stress related. No particular point. Just saying. Facing cross examination on ecat stuff could not have been easy!

    Why not to go strait to the trash?


  • I do understand what you are doing. Of course I do. You are twisting a completely factual statement made by Rossi to something that induce some FUD that was simply not there. Where the f*ck was Rossi supposed to say the demo was held in your opinion? Or do you not understand the word "at"? It is not the same as "by" you know. (and english is not my native...)


    Moved from the Rossi blog thread. Eric

  • As always, your are defending Dott. Rossi and what he does with all the sharpness of your mind (including words, beginning with "F").


    I've made my point up.

    I have nothing to add to my previous posting.

    I know, that it is useless to debate with you.


    Moved from the Rossi blog thread. Eric

  • I do understand what you are doing. Of course I do. You are twisting a completely factual statement made by Rossi to something that induce some FUD that was simply not there. Where the f*ck was Rossi supposed to say the demo was held in your opinion? Or do you not understand the word "at"? It is not the same as "by" you know. (and english is not my native...)


    Moved from the Rossi blog thread. Eric

    10 thumbs down to "Moved from the Rossi blog thread. Eric"

  • E_man : rest assured that we'll do our best to keep the discussion in the other threads civil, including moving contentless personal attacks and other unworthy comments here (time, energy and level of irritation permitting). It will happen as often as is necessary. If needed, account suspensions are a further possibility.

  • Fabio and Levi (if the guy in the red sweater is Levi) appear to have gained a great deal of weight-- an immense amount in fact. I wonder if it's stress related. No particular point. Just saying. Facing cross examination on ecat stuff could not have been easy!


    They also look older than 5 years ago..what is up with that? :)

  • E_man : rest assured that we'll do our best to keep the discussion in the other threads civil, including moving contentless personal attacks and other unworthy comments here (time, energy and level of irritation permitting). It will happen as often as is necessary. If needed, account suspensions are a further possibility.


    And I was only following your very specific instruction and corrected a factual issue connected to the post made... Well, well. I guess you only want to prove your pure intentions... Point taken...

  • Quite to the contrary, sifferkoll , although I'm disinclined to take this far:

    • "I do understand what you are doing. Of course I do. You are twisting a completely factual statement made by Rossi to something that induce some FUD that was simply not there." (Imputation of trying to be misleading and casting doubt on the integrity of bang99, when other possibilities exist.)
    • Where the f*ck was Rossi supposed to say the demo was held in your opinion? (Unnecessarily charged language, taking things away from civil, dispassionate discussion.)

    You're more or less on permanent probation, so where this kind of thing might be overlooked in the case of others, not so much you. That's life.


  • Wow! I cant understand that you don't understand that Rossi understands that you would write this kind of statement. Of course he knows there are an infinite amount of fraud scenarios to be made up.... This one is pathetically simple and only shows your bad intentions (flashing your cards...) Please meditate on the fact that Rossi did not do this demo for you, although he did know you would trash it for sure...


    Moved from the QX demo thread. Eric

  • I don't think it's necessary to make an unverifiable dog and pony show to protect IP in this case. You can literally put the device in a small crate on a platform visibly above the ground, hiding the contents from the audience or cameras or whatever, and carefully and rigorously measure input power, water flow rate and output delta T over a long period of time. If the thing goes on for long enough, chemical sources of energy can be ruled out.


    This is not about whether I like that Rossi is attempting to protect his IP. It's about what "he is protecting his IP" includes and excludes as possibilities. He can both protect his IP and allow for a rigorous black box test. He shuns rigorous measurement, and, we can reasonably conclude, for reasons other than protecting IP.


    DPS FUD going on I see.


    But, lets leave that for a moment - I guess it is in your script to paint a picture of Rossi as wanting to show YOU (or any other "skeptic"/tr**l/a***ot****r) that it performs as stated. I'll let you in on a secret : He knows you exist and why, and has concluded it is absolutely useless to go the path you want him to go... Get it? For him it is enough to show those people who really matters to his objectives and that it works. And those people know what risks are involved (hint: if it actually works is not a major one of them - that is the easy part) .


    Moved from the QX demo thread. Eric

  • Quote

    For him it is enough to show those people who really matters to his objectives and that it works.

    Nonsense. It's quite enough if he can bamboozle a rich person into giving him money. Based on this demo, it's doubtful that he can but hell, there are still stupid people out there with money!


    Quote

    And those people know what risks are involved (hint: if it actually works is not a major one of them - that is the easy part) .

    They know the risks? Like Rossi's first distributors knew the risks? Like the silly Swedish professors knew the risks? Like Darden, Vaughn and Woodford knew the risks? If they had known the risks of dealing with a proven con man, they probably would have passed on it.

  • But, lets leave that for a moment - I guess it is in your script to paint a picture of Rossi as wanting to show YOU (or any other "skeptic"/tr**l/a***ot****r) that it performs as stated. I'll let you in on a secret : He knows you exist and why, and has concluded it is absolutely useless to go the path you want him to go... Get it? For him it is enough to show those people who really matters to his objectives and that it works. And those people know what risks are involved (hint: if it actually works is not a major one of them - that is the easy part) .


    Siffer,


    You and Rossi are two peas in a pod. Why in the hell would Rossi know him, or even care, unless you cornered him at the event yesterday and whispered in his ear? Did you show Rossi that hit piece you wrote on the moderator, and solicit a comment from him about snakes and clowns?


    You are going of the deep end again. Did you ever try for one day to stay off the conspiracy stuff? If not, at least try to keep the venom out of your posts.


    Edit: I see you got yourself banned again. No sympathy from me.

  • pparently you don't understand that they are nothing but claims without a shred of evidence to support them. Instead, you quote them as if they were proven fact. And yes, you are proud to sign your name to those laughable assertions. Good for you.

    Don't be so pathetic. What do you think CLAIM means? I have already stated a different test would be required to verify the claims, that would be easy enough to do in private - as they would reveal Rossi's IP.


    I'm starting wonder if English is your first language.

  • Ok Adrian. You got to call me names and question my command of the language. Feeling better?


    So here are your exact words:


    "The purpose of the demo was to show the characteristics of the QX. Not only did it do that well but you are overlooking that it was a significant advance.

    Consider its small size, that it can be instantly switched on and off, that it has a COP 500 - 1000. It can operate at 2300 C. That is a major step forward."


    Go ahead and explain how you are saying these things are just claims. As I read it, you are stating these things as facts with great confidence. You keep insulting me while you continue to make a fool of yourself. Carry on.

  • Go ahead and explain how you are saying these things are just claims. As I read it, you are stating these things as facts with great confidence. You keep insulting me while you continue to make a fool of yourself. Carry on.

    As I said already....

    "Don't be so pathetic. What do you think CLAIM means? I have already stated a different test would be required to verify the claims, that would be easy enough to do in private - as they would reveal Rossi's IP."

  • Quote

    I have already stated a different test would be required to verify the claims, that would be easy enough to do in private - as they would reveal Rossi's IP."

    Please explain how a black box test with proper metering of input power and proper measurement of power out would reveal anything at all, however slight, about Rossi's IP?