Clearance Items

  • BTW, here the statement from IVA about not endorsing Rossi’s presentation in English language (Dewwy linked previously to the Swedish site):

    https://www.iva.se/en/publishe…ens-den-24-november-2017/


    And what a coincidence, Rossi has today this comment on JONP:


  • However, Dewey's sustained attacks on anybody or anything related to Rossi and Rossi-tech, including his efforts to wind up the IVA makes me wonder if he is concerned that IH made a big mistake in falling out with him. Time will tell.


    Yeah, the sole amount of effort Dewey et al put into harassing everyone involved with Rossi in any way possible, is probably the clearest indication of them all that Rossi is the real thing. IH is clearly worried when going after Mats Lewan on a personal basis (finally getting IVA issue a vague statement after months of random legal threats the way Dewey is famous for maybe?). If they were sure Rossi had nothing, why would they bother?

  • Yeah, the sole amount of effort Dewey et al put into harassing everyone involved with Rossi in any way possible, is probably the clearest indication of them all that Rossi is the real thing. IH is clearly worried when going after Mats Lewan on a personal basis (finally getting IVA issue a vague statement after months of random legal threats the way Dewey is famous for maybe?). If they were sure Rossi had nothing, why would they bother?


    That is the catch 22. You have a guy like Rossi who is a great performer, exposed by legal Discovery as an obvious fake, and keeps internet watchers amused with his ability to continue to gull marks. Then said marks use the fact that internet watchers stay fascinated and strongly against Rossi as evidence Rossi must be the real thing?


    You are in conspiracy-land re IVA/Dewey. You think IVA liked hosting the Rossi circus?


    As for Dewey: ever since Rossi did his major stitch-up of IH it is bound to be personal: and Dewey is someone who fights when attacked. I agree: it would be better IH PR for Dewey to stay quiet here. But would you be able to do that when a con-man who has cost you $20M repeatedly says that your friends are dishonest and is somehow half-believed by a whole load of people?


    Anyway, since when has Dewey here been tactful or done the right thing for IH PR?

  • Anyway, since when has Dewey here been tactful or done the right thing for IH PR?


    This is actually a good argument ... And it kind of supports my hypothesis that his efforts are indication of Rossi being the real stuff. I do believe there are more incentive to trash the involved swedes due to the since possible disruptions presumably might benefit Dewey/IH et al. At least there is some business purpose to it. If they knew Rossi had nothing it would only be sandbox revenge of three year olds. Although that might be what Dewey is to you?

  • This is actually a good argument ... And it kind of supports my hypothesis that his efforts are indication of Rossi being the real stuff. I do believe there are more incentive to trash the involved swedes due to the since possible disruptions presumably might benefit Dewey/IH et al. At least there is some business purpose to it. If they knew Rossi had nothing it would only be sandbox revenge of three year olds. Although that might be what Dewey is to you?


    Dewey is an upfront guy who says what he thinks. If you'd been here during the IH/Rossi legal stuff you would have seen that. His idea of debate is similar to that of a bulldog which means in his book you are friend or enemy and boy does he go after his enemies. He will exaggerate his side, as any web pugilist, but not lie. I'm sorry I don't seem to be an enemy of Dewey: it would be fun to go after him.


    Your problem is that you need to see indications of Rossi having the real stuff in contorted (and IMHO completely wrong) observations of IH because Rossi for sure has never given anyone an indication his stuff works.


    The cleverer Rossi followers notice this and elevate it to a core belief. Rossi has to look like he is a flake to discourage competition. When he has a demo which claims to measure COP = 200 without ever measuring the input power (and with a beefy PSU capable of supplying all the measured output) this is a cunning plan of disinformation designed to make everyone doubt he has anything.


    It is this level of doublethink (vs 1984) that keeps me fascinated.

  • Alan - I had nothing to do with the IVA announcement or decision.

    Your ongoing efforts to sustain the ever shrinking sphere of influence the Wealthy Career Specialist have moved into the hypocritical. By whatever modality and, ignoring the big picture criminality for now, you're defending / supporting a system that seeks truth on one side and promotes / sustains lies on the other.

    You need to stop with the unforced errors and avoid any further damage to LF.

    I deal in facts - I don't know what you're dealing in or with. Open your eyes Alan.

    • Official Post

    Thank you Dewey. I am wondering though why the boss of the IVA conference centre chose to email you personally about this so long after the event? Or are you old friends? As for the 'ever shrinking etc etc you would be wrong to think I give a twopenny damn about politics and financial intrigues which surround Rossi, I am only interested in the science, NiH (and Ti/D) cold fusion offers a real hope of a better world, so long as it doesn't get 'owned' by too few people.


    ETA. LFH is doing very nicely, thank you for the plug, we just moved into a splendid new laboratory.

  • Somewhat nobel Alan -and very pleased to hear that your research is expanding - wish you the best there.

    I do wish that your curiosity and passion for details extended in the other direction but it never does.

    Your ongoing quickdraw defense of most things Rossi remains revelatory in the light of your words.

    Staying focused on the science will better serve this community. Science never demands or needs an apology.

  • Given that Rossi has done nothing visible to the public of any consequence other than his usual online blithering since the Stockholm fiasco, it is bizarre that this thread continues to be so active. Of course, its content is little more than pissing contests between Rossi supporters and Rossi detractors. How any of it has anything to do with supporting or, for that matter, disparaging LENR is hard to understand.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.