Clearance Items

Quote from sigmoidal

No evidence, no experiments, no theory, no math, no equations.

Center Vortex Flux Tube Interference.

The "Mining Diamond video" Shows that the LENR agent is moving inside the diamond. It is totally encased by the diamond and the agent destroys the diamond(makes it disappear) as it moves inside the diamond. At the end of its movement, it deposits a ball of transmuted material which is also totally encased inside the diamond. This behavior is common to many hundreds of LENR agent trails throughout the volume of the diamond.

From the tone of your criticisms, you did not look at the referenced experiment in the video.

Quote from sigmoidal

And then there's those triangular holes. Why not assert that this supports evidence of LENR? No explanation needed. Just more one-liner assertions. With seemingly unending non-explanations masquerading as explanations.

Rydberg matter is though to carry a hexagonal crystal structure. The triangular holes produced by the flux tubes matches up nicely with the hexagonal crystal form with half of the hexagon projecting the north pole of the flux tube and the other half of the crystal projecting the south pole.

Quote from axil

Center Vortex Flux Tube Interference.

External Content youtu.be

Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.

Display all external content

Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

The "Mining Diamond video" Shows that the LENR agent is moving inside the diamond. It is totally encased by the diamond and the agent destroys the diamond(makes it disappear) as it moves inside the diamond. At the end of its movement, it deposits a ball of transmuted material which is also totally encased inside the diamond. This behavior is common to many hundreds of LENR agent trails throughout the volume of the diamond.

From the tone of your criticisms, you did not look at the referenced experiment in the video.

Display More

First off, this is not YOUR video. It's Greenyers. At best you could try to argue that you are editorializing his findings. That's not original scientific discovery or theory. You have not provided any evidence, any experiments, any more-than-a few-line sentences of "theory" (actually merely assertions), no math, no explanatory physics.

Others have. Sometimes your cited sources provide these. But you never do. Yo'ure content to just throw out a few scientific-sounding one-liners as if they were factually meaningful, insightful, or explanatory.

They're not.

Here's some advice: since it's Greenyer's video, perhaps you should let Greenyer tell us what he thinks his results mean (he does). Notice Greenyer takes some time to discuss limitations of his findings. I don't agree with most of his assertions for other reasons. but I respect this more scientific aspect of his approach.

You would do well to follow his example.

Quote from axil

Rydberg matter is though to carry a hexagonal crystal structure. The triangular holes produced by the flux tubes matches up nicely with the hexagonal crystal form with half of the hexagon projecting the north pole of the flux tube and the other half of the crystal projecting the south pole.

"Triangular holes produced by the flux tubes"...

No shortage of imagination, Axil, I'll grant you that.

You must feel very self-satisfied to have come up with these explanations.

But I'm off to bed. I'll leave you to your fantastic tales.

Quote from sigmoidal

Therefore, you are persuaded that you are justified in asserting that this is "due to the action of chiral SPP activity".

Or a million other more likely explanations, including the obvious one that the experiment is merely exothermic. Or there is experimental error. This is why it's essentially impossible to take you seriously.

If you were an actual scientist, you would first do your own evaluation of possible alternative explanations. Scientists do this to (try to) avoid confirmation bias (self deception). As a scientist, I do this all the time.

You seem to have no concept or patience for this.

Display More

The lack of radioactive activation is a common property of all active LENR reactors. These reactors include those produced by LION, Parkhomov, and Rossi. There is a number that Bod Greenyer has looked at, and he also reports no radioactive activation in those reactor.

Regarding speculation in LENR theory: the idea that fusion is produced by loading deuterium in the lattice of palladium is speculation of the highest order and has be ridiculed by science for decades. Why is sigmoidal accepting that theory without question?

Quote from sigmoidal

Therefore, you are persuaded that you are justified in asserting that this is "due to the action of chiral SPP activity".

Or a million other more likely explanations, including the obvious one that the experiment is merely exothermic. Or there is experimental error. This is why it's essentially impossible to take you seriously.

If you were an actual scientist, you would first do your own evaluation of possible alternative explanations. Scientists do this to (try to) avoid confirmation bias (self deception). As a scientist, I do this all the time.

You seem to have no concept or patience for this.

Display More

I know one thing. Your high powered background not withstanding, You have never heard of chiral spin and polaritons until I had to explained them to you.

I am putting forth a system's engineering model of the LENR reaction. All the science in that LENR reaction model currently exists and is included in the standard model, particle physics, nanoplasmonics and nano optics. What I am trying to identify is what areas of science correspond to LENR functionality and behavior. What areas of science supports the lack of radio activation in LENR. what produces heat as apposed to gamma radiation, what is strange radiation, how LENR moves matter around, among any number of other hard to understand and seemingly miracle like behaviors that LENR demonstrates. The theory is not new science, it is a systems model of LENR using existing science involving a survey of many and diverse LENR systems.

As a prototype of a systems model of LENR, look at

A Student's Guide to Cold Fusion - LENR-CANR.org

Quote from axil

Particle spin is the source of magnetism. This magnetism is what is the common interface between the SPP and the quark.

axil : The words in blue are the only true thing you brought on! And in fact LENR is based on magnetism. But to explain it you need a little bit of Newton and a lot of Maxwell and nothing of the standard model.

Thus all other things you mention are inadequate.

Thus the only thing I can recommend (also to others): Wait until things are settled and will be published.

Nobody serious will comment your phantasies!

@JohnyFive:

The key to success in getting an active LENR reaction is fuel preparation. There have been a number of sucessful fuel preparation methods developed over the years. The first is heavily loaded palladium with deuterium. Try vapor deposition of palladium on a base of palladium micro powder in a deuterium atmosphere.

Or

Try LION's method. It has been posted about here somewhere on this site. diapads is a keyword that you can scan on to find those posts. The goal is to get deuterium to enter the diamond lattice so that the deuterium is compressed by that lattice. Try 250 micron diamonds as an alternative to diapads.

Or

try the ECCO reactor method where various elements and chemicals are treated using sonic horns fo weeks. See MFMP for details on this fuel prep method.

See

https://steemit.com/ecco/@mfmp…y-plasma-new-fire-reactor

Industrial Heat efforts

http://ansannual.org/wp-content/2018/Data/pdfs/212-24651.pdf

MODULAR ELECTROLYSIS APPARATUS WITH COOLED HEADER, CO-DISPOSED HEAT EXCHANGER AND GAS MANIFOLDS THEREFOR

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2018/0087165.html

... " the report appears to me etc."

Very optimistic

... "to bridge the gaps between laboratory research and a commercially

useful device ..."

Seven of Twenty is not playing with a full deck... Yet!

RESTITUIÇÃO DE COISAS APREENDIDAS Nº 71 - DF (2018/0093149-1)
REQUERENTE : E M L
ADVOGADO : EDUARDO MORETH LOQUEZ - DF015347
REQUERIDO : JUSTIÇA PÚBLICA
RELATOR : MINISTRO RAUL ARAÚJO - CORTE ESPECIAL
Distribuição por prevenção do processo Inq 1142 (2017/0006906-9) em 23/04/2018 às 18:15
CONCLUSÃO AO MINISTRO RELATOR
(2)
RECURSO ORDINÁRIO Nº 207 - SP (2018/0089336-9)
RECORRENTE : C M J
ADVOGADO : FLÁVIO GOMES CAETANO - SP198992
RECORRIDO : REPÚBLICA PORTUGUESA
ADVOGADO : SEM REPRESENTAÇÃO NOS AUTOS - SE000000M
RELATOR : MINISTRO HERMAN BENJAMIN - SEGUNDA TURMA
Distribuição automática em 23/04/2018 às 09:00
VISTA AO MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO FEDERAL
(3)
PEDIDO DE UNIFORMIZAÇÃO DE INTERPRETAÇÃO DE LEI Nº 774 - CE
(2018/0089393-9)
REQUERENTE : ESTADO DO CEARÁ
PROCURADOR : DANIEL MAIA TEIXEIRA E OUTRO(S) - CE017118B
REQUERIDO : ANTONIO GONCALVES FERREIRA
ADVOGADOS : SAMIA SILVA DE LIMA - CE026115
RAFAEL COELHO BASTOS - CE033187
RELATORA : MINISTRA ASSUSETE MAGALHÃES - PRIMEIRA SEÇÃO
pág. 2
Superior Tribunal de Justiça
DIÁRIO DA JUSTIÇA ELETRÔNICO
Edição nº 2420 – Brasília, disponibilização Terça-feira, 24 de Abril de 2018, publicação Quarta-feira, 25 de Abril de 2018.
Distribuição automática em 23/04/2018 às 09:00
CONCLUSÃO À MINISTRA RELATORA
(4)
PEDIDO DE TUTELA PROVISÓRIA Nº 1423 - RJ (2018/0091963-3)
REQUERENTE : EDILMA MASCARENHAS CORREA SILVA
ADVOGADOS : GUSTAVO KLOH - RJ104856
PEDRO NAVARRO CÉSAR - RJ121804
DANILO BOTELHO DOS SANTOS E OUTRO(S) - RJ122220
REQUERIDO : CARLOS AUGUSTO MACHADO RABELLO
RELATOR : MINISTRO ANTONIO CARLOS FERREIRA - QUARTA TURMA
Distribuição por prevenção do processo AREsp 1029036 (2016/0328190-0) em 23/04/2018 às 09:00
CONCLUSÃO AO MINISTRO RELATOR
(5)
PEDIDO DE TUTELA PROVISÓRIA Nº 1424 - SP (2018/0093112-6)
REQUERENTE : EVANDRO DO NASCIMENTO QUINTANA
REQUERENTE : QUINTANA SUPLEMENTO E NUTRICAO ANIMAL LTDA
ADVOGADOS : CARLOS ALBERTO PACIANOTTO JÚNIOR - SP214264
FLÁVIO AUGUSTO VALÉRIO FERNANDES - SP209083
CESAR LOPES CRUZ - SP357132
REQUERIDO : BANCO BRADESCO S/A
RELATORA : MINISTRA PRESIDENTE DO STJ
MINISTRO IMPEDIDO : MINISTRO BENEDITO GONÇALVES
Processo registrado em 23/04/2018 às 18:45
CONCLUSÃO À MINISTRA RELATORA
(6)
HOMOLOGAÇÃO DE DECISÃO ESTRANGEIRA Nº 1617 - JP (2018/0091140-0)
REQUERENTE : T A O
ADVOGADO : GUILHERME BERKENBROCK CAMARGO - PR053609
REQUERIDO : S O
RELATORA : MINISTRA PRESIDENTE DO STJ
Processo registrado em 23/04/2018 às 14:30
CONCLUSÃO À MINISTRA PRESIDENTA
(7)
HOMOLOGAÇÃO DE DECISÃO ESTRANGEIRA Nº 1618 - US (2018/0091979-5)
REQUERENTE : S B C
ADVOGADO : WILSON MARCELO MININI DE CASTRO - RO004769
REQUERIDO : J M C
RELATORA : MINISTRA PRESIDENTE DO STJ
Processo registrado em 23/04/2018 às 14:30
pág. 3
Superior Tribunal de Justiça
DIÁRIO DA JUSTIÇA ELETRÔNICO
Edição nº 2420 – Brasília, disponibilização Terça-feira, 24 de Abril de 2018, publicação Quarta-feira, 25 de Abril de 2018.
CONCLUSÃO À MINISTRA PRESIDENTA
(8)
HOMOLOGAÇÃO DE DECISÃO ESTRANGEIRA Nº 1619 - IT (2018/0092356-6)
REQUERENTE : G L
ADVOGADO : AURISTELA LEAL DA ANUNCIAÇÃO - BA021523
RELATORA : MINISTRA PRESIDENTE DO STJ
Processo registrado em 23/04/2018 às 16:30
CONCLUSÃO À MINISTRA RELATORA
(9)
HOMOLOGAÇÃO DE DECISÃO ESTRANGEIRA Nº 1620 - US (2018/0092462-8)
REQUERENTE : L F S C
ADVOGADOS : MARIANA VIOLANTE DE GOEYE BUTRICO - SP250232
BEATRIZ LUBAMBO LYRA E CASTRO PERRETTI - SP347155
REQUERIDO : L D J S C
RELATORA : MINISTRA PRESIDENTE DO STJ
Processo registrado em 23/04/2018 às 14:30
CONCLUSÃO À MINISTRA PRESIDENTA
(10)
EXECUÇÃO EM AÇÃO RESCISÓRIA Nº 6003 - MG (2018/0092785-0)
EXEQUENTE : FABRICIO MENDONCA MARTINS
ADVOGADO : FABRICIO MENDONCA MARTINS (EM CAUSA PRÓPRIA) -
MG145743
EXECUTADO : INSTITUTO NACIONAL DO SEGURO SOCIAL
PROCURADOR : JOÃO MARCELO TORRES CHINELATO - DF021034
RELATOR : MINISTRO PRESIDENTE DA PRIMEIRA SEÇÃO - PRIMEIRA SEÇÃO
Processo registrado em 23/04/2018 às 16:00
COORDENADORIA DE EXECUÇÃO JUDICIAL

Got it... Good.