Clearance Items

Mac use....r had wondered why the post was the same as everything already posted.

Sorry, seems the video attached disappears. when i post.

it was a video on A Diamagnetic Levitation Sculpture to keep a magnetic exiting object centered .

I was going to put this in a PM but..

It just seems most are using the million dollar front end machine instead of the piece of string from the old way. Now we have a hand full of people doing front end alignment ripping people off and virtually no one that can think to use string from the back tire to the front tire , ask anyone in here how to do it without a million dollar machine. you get the idea... I don/t know how I can help past this point..without using string.= old TV to understand magnetic rotation from something that looks like a ratchet gear.

maybe I just need sleep..

errr..

Quote from DnG

Congrats to NASA,

Mission accomplished, well done

Quote from zorud

Rossi has no problem to run experiments in his garage lab that other hightech labs around the globe with the best scientists and billions of dollars of support are incapable of doing...

Is this post on topic?

Quote from sam12

Rossi is like the good mechanic who can’t afford the high tech shop but will after hours to get your car repaired for morning.

Is this post on topic?

Quote from Alan Smith

Your post is off-topic, but never mind for now.

this thread is a Rossi free zone or is it?

Quote from axil

Rossi must have found a way to pump the plasma in a less complicated way. Maybe just polarized RF is enough.

It's Rossi and it's Christmas time! So I guess wishful thinking does the trick...

lobsteRboy aka damn_right_man

Quote from Zeus46

lobsteRboy aka damn_right_man

Can we please focus on the topic, thanks.

Quote from seven_of_twenty

The piece cited by Alan Smithis by Tom Whipple. Mr. Whipple has supported Rossi at length and vociferously for years and far as I know has never repudiated him. At least I've never seen such a repudiation and I have a standing search for "Rossi" in Google. Far as I know, he reported on all sorts of RossiWonders but never wrote about the Rossi vs IH debacle and all the RossiFailures.

Also, he censors the replies to his articles. In most cases, all effective rebuttals are deleted. You can draw your own conclusions about his credibility.

The post above is by Mary Yugo. Mr. Yugo has criticised a number of researchers at length and vociferously for years, usually without reading their work. He's (probably) an obsessive dotard as evidenced by his standing search for "Rossi" in Google, and the repetitiveness of his writings. Far as I know, he has never had a technical or legal education but comments endlessly about the Rossi vs IH debacle and LENR in general.

Also, he never admits to his frequent mistakes and misunderstandings. In all cases, effective rebuttals are ignored. You can draw your own conclusions about his credibility.

This is interesting:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/s…ove-science/#43e455f0734b

From https://www.forbes.com/sites/s…ove-science/#43e455f0734b There are, no doubt, charlatans and frauds who would exploit the ignorance and gullibility of others for their own gain, such as convicted fraud Andrea Rossi, shown with his highly-suspect device: the e-Cat. Wanting to believe in an outcome or conclusion is no substitute for the robust conclusions brought about by the full suite of scientific evidence.

Why is it Rossi the charlatan?

BTW:

Quote from Rends

We Mods&Admins discussed whether to add 'problematic' LENR projects to the list and came to the conclusion that although those projects may be possibly scam, they are still prominent LENR storys and the L-F-User are mature and informed enough to build up their own minds.

What about adding a tenth story? "F&P boil-off experiment (a review)"

Only on L-F would a mod move a FORBES article link that calls the R'ster a charlatan and fraud to "clearance".