..And invest in Rossi differently, maybe even directly.
Cheers,
JB
Wouldn't that be the move of the century! Big, bold, and in somebody's face.
Rossi vs. Darden aftermath discussions
-
-
Yup! The move of the century. They could use this logo:
-
Display More
You must be right. Rossi looks down and out. Luckily he can forget about his grievance and monetary worries by planning E-Cat QX presentations, publishing papers and informing the interested about his progress.
It wouldn't surprise me if Dewey Weaver posts a picture of Thomas Darden on this beautiful forum, slamming tequila's on a sandy white beach somewhere. Celebrating his great victory.
/sarc
Cheers,
JBBut, but, but, WHEN are we going to see the QuackX being sold by wholesalers or retailers, as promised for many years, and as promised is to be soon forthcoming? Why is Rossi even giving "demos" of the QuackX, the Believers have already stated that NOTHING other than mass commercial sales will convince the non-believers, and you do not need convincing--so why is Rossi wasting his time??
-
(Tohuko University, Green Planet Inc., Nissan, Mitsubishi et al) Sweden (Elforsk, Vattenfall, Volvo et.al) as well US-Americans (National Instruments, Lockheed, NASA, etc.) and many more, so either they all have nothing, or they develop in secret on high tours in order to gain a competitive advantage, and they are all very glad that Rossi and Industrial Heat attracted the complete public attention, so that they can work inconspicuous.
I have been in contact with everyone on your list and with many other researchers. I do not know a single researcher, anywhere, who is glad that Rossi and I.H. attracted public attention. They all consider Rossi a fraud and a disaster to the field.
Also, several of the organizations on your list have not been hiding their work. They published in peer-reviewed journals or on the internet.
So, what you are saying is a complete fantasy.
-
When I was still half-believing Rossi, I invested in the Woodford Patient Capital Trust as being a relatively low risk way of sharing in potential profit from LENR.
Admittedly, I got in when the fund was out of favour, but I'm a happy bunny now, with 19% return in 17 months.
So the IH/Rossi shenanigans have had no identifiable adverse effect, although the upside could maybe have been even better had the 1MW plant been a real thing
Good for you. You put your money where your mouth was. No downside. 19% upside, even though IH/Woodford supposedly 'lost' the case. And huge upside if it had been a real thing. Now what's the next good LENR investment on the horizon?
-
Display More
The reason nobody took your Betmoose bet was, if I remember right, that it was vague and unclear and it would have been able for you to weasel out a dozen different ways. I'll even try to figure out bitcoins (ugh!) if you structure a decent bet on betmoose. If you draft it here (maybe in a new string) maybe our visiting legal eagles can help flesh it out.
Why don't you just do it, since you have a thousand objections and I'll never think of them all. But you sure don't seem to have trouble with coming up with them. No one said anything at the time about vagueness nor lack of clarity. It is more likely the case that the loudest skeptopaths simply don't put their money where their mouth is.
Bets against Rossi at long odds aren't worth the trouble. If you really believe in the guy, bet at even odds.
That's the point, which you simply did not grasp. If someone is asking 25:1 odds to bet for the guy, how is it that skeptopaths can put him into the Rossi Planet KoolAid Drinkers side of things? It is because so many on this blog get triggered by even the slightest positive thing said about Rossi.
-
But, but, but, WHEN are we going to see the QuackX being sold by wholesalers or retailers, as promised for many years, and as promised is to be soon forthcoming? Why is Rossi even giving "demos" of the QuackX, the Believers have already stated that NOTHING other than mass commercial sales will convince the non-believers, and you do not need convincing--so why is Rossi wasting his time??
He's doing it to raise his profile.
-
Betmoose is untrustworthy because it is centralized. Either Augur or Gnosis will be the go-to prediction market of the future. Augur is closest, and should be out of beta this year. They are both decentralized platforms, and so, your bets are guaranteed, and nobody will run away with your funds (they are smart-contract based, which are censorship-resistant, and impossible to game).
Who is the prediction market of the present?
-
Wouldn't that be the move of the century! Big, bold, and in somebody's face.
There is yet another thing we could bet on. Dang, I wish there was a suitable prediction market.
-
-
@ maryyugo,
It's not a "journal". It's a misnamed blog which Rossi has perpetrated at least since 2011. He certainly controls it and one could assume he owns the domain as well.
Everyone here knows what the JoNP is. "Journal" was the ironic term used by sigmoidal, to whom I was asking an opinion about the 2 questions raised by Krivit on Vortex in 2010. The same 2 questions I already addressed to you one year ago (1).
In the mean time, the DoD didn't answer the inquiry on LENR raised by the US House of Representatives, and the lawsuit in front of the Federal Court of Miami did end as you know. So after more than 7 years there is no authoritative answer to the Krivit's questions, and sorry but your "one could assume" is neither authoritative, nor an answer at all.
(1) https://www.lenr-forum.com/for…D/?postID=30415#post30415 -
So, what you are saying is a complete fantasy.
They published in peer-reviewed journals or on the internet
Where? -
In the mean time, the DoD didn't answer the inquiry on LENR raised by the US House of Representatives,
Ascoli,
Some news on that popped up recently:
-
Why is Rossi even giving "demos" of the QuackX, the Believers have already stated that NOTHING other than mass commercial sales will convince the non-believers
He is back fishing again, that (demo) is the bait, and he is hoping a big fat investor takes the hook. From his ECW interview today, Rossisays he has had a few nibbles, but so far no takers.
-
Ok, I think I've figured out the error that gives the high claimed COP of the quarkx. They claim 0.1V over a 1ohm resistor. This means there is 0.1 amp flowing through the rest of the circuit regardless of the unknown resistance in the rest of the circuit. If the ecat has a resistance of 0ohm (unlikely) it has 0 power through it. If it has resistance of 1000ohm, it has 1000 times more power going through it than they claim by Power=current *current*R. By stating the current through the ecat, not stating the resistance of the ecat which is trivial to measure, and implying the ecat has near 0 resistance, might be misleading. The ecat has to have a resistance or there is no way for it to absorb power. They are measuring the power over an un-involved resistor and claiming that is the input power which does not make sense. Their measurement technique for input power does not seem valid whether the actual power is higher or lower.
-
Where?
Look. it. up. I uploaded thousands of papers and a comprehensive index, so Look It Up. Stop asking me to spoon-feed you information.
-
"Two LENR research areas:
-Muon-Catalyzed Fusion: Broadly accepted, based on well understood physics
-Electrolytic Cell: Has not been reproduced independently and has not provided the necessary technical information to provide a scientific foundation for scalable research."Seems like the authors of the slide deck have some catching up to do!
-
The ecat has to have a resistance or there is no way for it to absorb power.
It doesn't absorb power, it emits it (according to Rossi).
-
It doesn't absorb power, it emits it (according to Rossi).
What I'm saying is the 1ohm resistor has nothing to do with the Ecat's input power. It is being used as a meter. We need to know the ecat's actual resistance to know the input power.
-
What I'm saying is the 1ohm resistor has nothing to do with the Ecat's input power. It is being used as a meter. We need to know the ecat's actual resistance to know the input power.
The 1 Ohm resistor is being used as a current limiter. The ecat is more akin to a battery than a resistor.
