Well, you can't compromise on science. Given that calorimetry can have an error rate of 30% or more, most low level CF excess energy results should be considered inconclusive or failures unless backed up by other evidence.
You are losing credibility.
If you were right, engineers woudl sure know it
It can be very precise
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LonchamptGreproducti.pdf
QuoteDisplay MoreOne of the criticisms of the Fleischmann and Pons work has been the temperature uniformity inside the
cell. If temperature varies, the radiation law is not valid, and all radiation losses calculations should be wrong. We
have looked carefully at this point, and by raising the thermistor, from its standard location in the middle of the cell
all the way to the surface of the water. We have seen no significant temperature variation, indicating that mixing by
the gases of the electrolysis is sufficient.On the assumption that all heat losses are due to radiation, our platinum blank experiments indicate that this
is a good approximation, and that the maximum error might be in the higher temperature range, and should not
exceed 1%.
Concerning condensation on the inner surface of the plug, again our platinum runs indicate that it is
negligible.