Ultrasound induced transmutations in metal bars?

  • When a photon is created out of the quantum vacuum fluctuation, it produces zero energy. To do that, the photon and the anti photon are created in a pair.



    This is one of the most counterintuitive, yet, one of the most important principles in quantum mechanics: that vacuum is by no means empty nothingness. In fact, the vacuum is full of various particles that are continuously fluctuating in and out of existence. They appear, exist for a brief moment and then disappear again. Since their existence is so fleeting, they are usually referred to as virtual particles.


    The pair of photons must be opposites of each other. For a photon, this means that the pair must have one member as left handed and the other member of the pair as right handed. When these to waveforms are added together, their sum must result in zero energy.

    main-qimg-8cfe81e9535963bf76c7ed3e8050d80a-c

    https://phys.org/news/2011-11-scientists-vacuum.html


    Scientists create light from vacuum




    When a virtual photon pair is created near a black hole, one photon of the pair is absorbed by the black hole and the other exits to the far field as hawking radiation. The Bose condensate of polaritons act identically like a black hole. In this mode, The Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) condensate can extract both right and left handed photons from the quantum vacuum

    fluctuations.


    Any light that is generated by a polariton condensate is derived from vacuum energy. The SPP can store both right and left handed photons in two counterrotating currents.


    The Polariton condensate will produce mesons from this inflow of vacuum energy into the "Electromagnetic Black Hole". This condensate will also produce both light and heat as Hawking Radiation.


    https://arxiv.org/pdf/1104.3013

    Black Holes and Wormholes in spinor polariton condensates


    https://pdfs.semanticscholar.o…3360c7cfedc666e0be1ab.pdf


    Observation of self-amplifying Hawking radiation in an analog black hole laser

  • When these to waveforms are added together, their sum must result in zero energy.


    axil you just invented the negative energy... Or can you tell us which orbit a photon with negative energy takes??


    Please remember that they talk of virtual photons that are use to solve some boundary problems, that arise because the still use the wrong 3D,t (Minkovski) metric for dense space...

  • Except virtual particles are not actually particles, and they are virtual.

    The virtual photon and "antiphoton" are created by math. They do represent disturbances in the photon field, and might be directly linked to disturbances in other fields, caused by real particles, like for example real electrons described by the electron field. However a virtual photon is an abstraction, not an actual photon. The reason that the exact opposite virtual particle is "created" in a pair, is that describing the disturbance requires adding a term to an equation, and this cannot be done unilaterally, and the added term settles down to the normal background (typically zero) after the physical cause has moved along.

    (Like a fish creating a tiny bulge in the water above it as it glides smoothly just below the surface, raising the bulge means lowering the normal water level by an equal amount in some fashion.)


    The virtual particles belonging to a virtual particle-antiparticle pair do not annihilate each other when they come together. This is because they are made of math describing a distortion in a field, not coherent particles. (The field distortion itself is real). If they were real particle -antiparticle pairs, they probably would annihilate each other, releasing (potentially) useable energy.

  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation


    Quote

    An alternative view of the process is that vacuum fluctuations cause a particle–antiparticle pair to appear close to the event horizon of a black hole. One of the pair falls into the black hole while the other escapes. In order to preserve total energy, the particle that fell into the black hole must have had a negative energy (with respect to an observer far away from the black hole). This causes the black hole to lose mass, and, to an outside observer, it would appear that the black hole has just emitted a particle. In another model, the process is a quantum tunnelling effect, whereby particle–antiparticle pairs will form from the vacuum, and one will tunnel outside the event horizon



    http://www.rochester.edu/newsc…s-generate-lasers-290202/


    Quote

    “By causing an exciton to give up some of its identity to a photon to create a polariton, we end up with an object that has a negative mass associated with it,” Vamivakas explains. “That’s kind of a mind-bending thing to think about, because if you try to push or pull it, it will go in the opposite direction from what your intuition would tell you.”

  • Thanks Axil.. I am not sure about antiphoton creation in LENR.


    I prefer Ivlev's mathematical theory of anomalous electron states(AES). According to this theory fast electromagnetic shocks cause constrained electrons to

    jump down a deep well screaming out Mev photons. Conceivably all 26 electrons in an iron atom can leap down into the well producing a nanoatom 1000

    times less in diameter.


    These shocks can be provided by ultrasound or cavitation or by

    ions hitting the surface(as in plasma activation a la Mizuno and Karabut.


    If Ivlev's ""I shrunk the kids""

    theory can be realised its effects are far wider than

    just LENR. I hope he stays alive long enough to see some of them.


    https://www.google.com.au/url?…Vaw3SCEIqpLX0TKKw6RrC-6of

  • How does a polariton Bose condensate store energy.




    Quote

    Slowing Down & Stopping Light

    BECs have been shown experimentally to slow down and stop light. In 1998, Lene Hau slowed light traveling through a BEC from its speed in vacuum of 3 × 108 metres per second to 17 metres per second (about 38 miles per hour). Later on Hau and others have frozen and stored a beam of light within a BEC, before releasing the light unchanged, or transmitting it to a second BEC. Potential applications lie in many areas including quantum computing, holographic information storage, and communications.


    Regarding:


    "Moreover, some collimated X-ray bursts have been seen

    up to 20 hours after switching off the discharge voltage."


    This ability to stop light is how an X-ray burst can be seen 20 hours after input energy was stooped in Alan's referenced experiment.



  • Max Nozin "how Ivelv theory is different from hydrino wrt resulting atoms with deep electron orbits."


    Boris Ivlev's math in


    https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.00520


    is very different from "hydrino" math a la Mills. Mills said that

    the dropping down the well was quantised.. not Ivlev..


    I don't understand it very much at all but I understand that according to Ivlev, in heavy metals like iron the shock or jolt for the electrons is much greater than in lighter atoms.


    Looking at the lead disappearance experiment there are lots of questions


    1. if 0.6mg of lead atoms each released 82 x1 keV of energy that would be 164000000 Joules.

    If 1Mev each.. then much much more.


    the exposure plates don't look like they got that much energy.no way

    where did the energy go?


    What was the composition of the micron 'lead' residues?


    What happens if different metals like Al used?


    The simple experiment cries out for Replication Replication Replication!

    But Mexico will spend R&D on oil and gas or geothermal

    not new energy sources.

  • I prefer Ivlev's mathematical theory of anomalous electron states(AES). According to this theory fast electromagnetic shocks cause constrained electrons to

    jump down a deep well screaming out Mev photons. Conceivably all 26 electrons in an iron atom can leap down into the well producing a nanoatom 1000

    times less in diameter.


    bocijn : Ivlev uses the outdated standard model that is based on the wrong guv metric. If you understand basic physic laws it is easy to understand that only two space dimensions are left for relativistic treatment not three as used in guv.

    The final result Ivlev gets is not completely wrong as it is pretty "close" to the correct cavity value for an electron of 2*π*me - me.